Cargando…
Human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry
BACKGROUND: The digital medicine system (DMS), a drug–device combination developed for patients with serious mental illness, integrates adherence measurement with pharmacologic treatment by embedding an ingestible sensor in a pill, allowing for information sharing among patients, health care provide...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S157102 |
_version_ | 1783301096402321408 |
---|---|
author | Peters-Strickland, Timothy Hatch, Ainslie Adenwala, Anke Atkinson, Katie Bartfeld, Benjamin |
author_facet | Peters-Strickland, Timothy Hatch, Ainslie Adenwala, Anke Atkinson, Katie Bartfeld, Benjamin |
author_sort | Peters-Strickland, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The digital medicine system (DMS), a drug–device combination developed for patients with serious mental illness, integrates adherence measurement with pharmacologic treatment by embedding an ingestible sensor in a pill, allowing for information sharing among patients, health care providers (HCPs), and caregivers via a mobile interface. Studies conducted during the DMS development process aimed to minimize cognitive burden and use-related risks and demonstrated effective use of the technology. METHODS: Human factors (HF) studies assessed the system’s safe and effective use by the intended users for the intended uses. The patient interface was tested in six formative HF studies followed by a validation study. The HCP/caregiver interface was tested in one study before validation. All tasks critical to safety or necessary for effective use were included. Formative studies identified use-related risks and the causes of use problems to guide design modification. Validation of the patient and HCP/caregiver interfaces assessed risks of the final product. RESULTS: During the patient formative studies, design improvements were made to address problems and mitigate risks thought to be associated with a suboptimal system design or patient understanding of the system. In the validation study of the patient interface, 35 patients attempted 23 performance tasks, for a total of 805 attempts; 783/805 attempts were completed with success. One close call, 15 failures, and 6 difficulties occurred on these user tasks; only 3 of these were on a critical task. Residual risks resistant to mitigation were found to be of low severity based on the US Food and Drug Administration 2016 guidance. CONCLUSION: The final design of the DMS reflects input by the intended user populations through a comprehensive development methodology. In alignment with the US Food and Drug Administration goals for HF studies, the system was found to be safe and effective for the intended users, uses, and use environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5818865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58188652018-03-01 Human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry Peters-Strickland, Timothy Hatch, Ainslie Adenwala, Anke Atkinson, Katie Bartfeld, Benjamin Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research BACKGROUND: The digital medicine system (DMS), a drug–device combination developed for patients with serious mental illness, integrates adherence measurement with pharmacologic treatment by embedding an ingestible sensor in a pill, allowing for information sharing among patients, health care providers (HCPs), and caregivers via a mobile interface. Studies conducted during the DMS development process aimed to minimize cognitive burden and use-related risks and demonstrated effective use of the technology. METHODS: Human factors (HF) studies assessed the system’s safe and effective use by the intended users for the intended uses. The patient interface was tested in six formative HF studies followed by a validation study. The HCP/caregiver interface was tested in one study before validation. All tasks critical to safety or necessary for effective use were included. Formative studies identified use-related risks and the causes of use problems to guide design modification. Validation of the patient and HCP/caregiver interfaces assessed risks of the final product. RESULTS: During the patient formative studies, design improvements were made to address problems and mitigate risks thought to be associated with a suboptimal system design or patient understanding of the system. In the validation study of the patient interface, 35 patients attempted 23 performance tasks, for a total of 805 attempts; 783/805 attempts were completed with success. One close call, 15 failures, and 6 difficulties occurred on these user tasks; only 3 of these were on a critical task. Residual risks resistant to mitigation were found to be of low severity based on the US Food and Drug Administration 2016 guidance. CONCLUSION: The final design of the DMS reflects input by the intended user populations through a comprehensive development methodology. In alignment with the US Food and Drug Administration goals for HF studies, the system was found to be safe and effective for the intended users, uses, and use environments. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5818865/ /pubmed/29497299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S157102 Text en © 2018 Peters-Strickland et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Peters-Strickland, Timothy Hatch, Ainslie Adenwala, Anke Atkinson, Katie Bartfeld, Benjamin Human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry |
title | Human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry |
title_full | Human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry |
title_fullStr | Human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry |
title_full_unstemmed | Human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry |
title_short | Human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry |
title_sort | human factors evaluation of a novel digital medicine system in psychiatry |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S157102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersstricklandtimothy humanfactorsevaluationofanoveldigitalmedicinesysteminpsychiatry AT hatchainslie humanfactorsevaluationofanoveldigitalmedicinesysteminpsychiatry AT adenwalaanke humanfactorsevaluationofanoveldigitalmedicinesysteminpsychiatry AT atkinsonkatie humanfactorsevaluationofanoveldigitalmedicinesysteminpsychiatry AT bartfeldbenjamin humanfactorsevaluationofanoveldigitalmedicinesysteminpsychiatry |