Cargando…

The Fluid Dynamical Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease Prosthesis

The aim of the present in vitro study was the evaluation of the fluid dynamical performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease depending on the prosthetic size (21, 23, and 25 mm) and the cardiac output (3.6–6.4 L/min). A self-constructed flow channel in combination with particle image v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marx, Philipp, Kowalczyk, Wojciech, Demircioglu, Aydin, Brault, Gary Neil, Wendt, Hermann, Shehada, Sharaf-Eldin, Tsagakis, Konstantinos, El Gabry, Mohamed, Jakob, Heinz, Wendt, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5429594
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of the present in vitro study was the evaluation of the fluid dynamical performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease depending on the prosthetic size (21, 23, and 25 mm) and the cardiac output (3.6–6.4 L/min). A self-constructed flow channel in combination with particle image velocimetry (PIV) enabled precise results with high reproducibility, focus on maximal and local peek velocities, strain, and velocity gradients. These flow parameters allow insights into the generation of forces that act on blood cells and the aortic wall. The results showed that the 21 and 23 mm valves have a quite similar performance. Maximal velocities were 3.03 ± 0.1 and 2.87 ± 0.13 m/s; maximal strain E(xx), 913.81 ± 173.25 and 896.15 ± 88.16 1/s; maximal velocity gradient E(yx), 1203.14 ± 221.84 1/s and 1200.81 ± 61.83 1/s. The 25 mm size revealed significantly lower values: maximal velocity, 2.47 ± 0.15 m/s; maximal strain E(xx), 592.98 ± 155.80 1/s; maximal velocity gradient E(yx), 823.71 ± 38.64 1/s. In summary, the 25 mm Magna Ease was able to create a wider, more homogenous flow with lower peak velocities especially for higher flow rates. Despite the wider flow, the velocity values close to the aortic walls did not exceed the level of the smaller valves.