Cargando…
Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pioglitazone was suspended for manufacture and sale by the Indian drug regulator in June 2013 due to its association with urinary bladder carcinoma, which was revoked within a short period (July 2013). The present questionnaire-based nationwide study was conducted to ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434060 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1416_15 |
_version_ | 1783301126237454336 |
---|---|
author | Goyal, Aman Singh, Harmanjit Sehgal, Vijay Kumar Jayanthi, C.R. Munshi, Renuka Bairy, K. Laxminarayana Kumar, Rakesh Kaushal, Sandeep Kakkar, Ashish Kumar Ambwani, Sneha Goyal, Chhaya Mazumdar, Goutameswar Adhikari, Anjan Das, Nina Stephy, Divya John Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan Dhasmana, D.C. Rehman, Shakil U. Chakrabarti, Amit Bhandare, Basavaraj Badyal, Dinesh Kumar Kaur, Inderpal Chandrashekar, K. Singh, Jagjit Dhamija, Puneet Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra Gupta, Yogendra Kumar |
author_facet | Goyal, Aman Singh, Harmanjit Sehgal, Vijay Kumar Jayanthi, C.R. Munshi, Renuka Bairy, K. Laxminarayana Kumar, Rakesh Kaushal, Sandeep Kakkar, Ashish Kumar Ambwani, Sneha Goyal, Chhaya Mazumdar, Goutameswar Adhikari, Anjan Das, Nina Stephy, Divya John Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan Dhasmana, D.C. Rehman, Shakil U. Chakrabarti, Amit Bhandare, Basavaraj Badyal, Dinesh Kumar Kaur, Inderpal Chandrashekar, K. Singh, Jagjit Dhamija, Puneet Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra Gupta, Yogendra Kumar |
author_sort | Goyal, Aman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pioglitazone was suspended for manufacture and sale by the Indian drug regulator in June 2013 due to its association with urinary bladder carcinoma, which was revoked within a short period (July 2013). The present questionnaire-based nationwide study was conducted to assess its impact on prescribing behaviour of physicians in India. METHODS: Between December 2013 and March 2014, a validated questionnaire was administered to physicians practicing diabetes across 25 centres in India. Seven hundred and forty questionnaires fulfilling the minimum quality criteria were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixteen (56.2%) physicians prescribed pioglitazone. Of these, 281 used it in less than the recommended dose of 15 mg/day. Most physicians (94.3%) were aware of recent regulatory events. However, only 333 (44.8%) changed their prescribing pattern. Seventeen of the 416 (4.1%) physicians who prescribed pioglitazone admitted having come across at least one type 2 diabetes mellitus patient (T2DM) who had urinary bladder carcinoma, and of these 13 said that it was in patients who took pioglitazone for a duration of more than two years. Only 7.8 per cent of physicians (n=58) categorically advocated banning pioglitazone, and the rest opined for its continuation or generating more evidence before decision could be taken regarding its use in T2DM. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the physicians though were aware of the regulatory changes with regard to pioglitazone, but their prescribing patterns were not changed for this drug. However, it was being used at lower than the recommended dose. There is a need for generating more evidence through improved pharmacovigilance activities and large-scale population-based prospective studies regarding the safety issues of pioglitazone, so as to make effectual risk-benefit analysis for its continual use in T2DM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5819028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58190282018-02-22 Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study Goyal, Aman Singh, Harmanjit Sehgal, Vijay Kumar Jayanthi, C.R. Munshi, Renuka Bairy, K. Laxminarayana Kumar, Rakesh Kaushal, Sandeep Kakkar, Ashish Kumar Ambwani, Sneha Goyal, Chhaya Mazumdar, Goutameswar Adhikari, Anjan Das, Nina Stephy, Divya John Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan Dhasmana, D.C. Rehman, Shakil U. Chakrabarti, Amit Bhandare, Basavaraj Badyal, Dinesh Kumar Kaur, Inderpal Chandrashekar, K. Singh, Jagjit Dhamija, Puneet Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra Gupta, Yogendra Kumar Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pioglitazone was suspended for manufacture and sale by the Indian drug regulator in June 2013 due to its association with urinary bladder carcinoma, which was revoked within a short period (July 2013). The present questionnaire-based nationwide study was conducted to assess its impact on prescribing behaviour of physicians in India. METHODS: Between December 2013 and March 2014, a validated questionnaire was administered to physicians practicing diabetes across 25 centres in India. Seven hundred and forty questionnaires fulfilling the minimum quality criteria were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixteen (56.2%) physicians prescribed pioglitazone. Of these, 281 used it in less than the recommended dose of 15 mg/day. Most physicians (94.3%) were aware of recent regulatory events. However, only 333 (44.8%) changed their prescribing pattern. Seventeen of the 416 (4.1%) physicians who prescribed pioglitazone admitted having come across at least one type 2 diabetes mellitus patient (T2DM) who had urinary bladder carcinoma, and of these 13 said that it was in patients who took pioglitazone for a duration of more than two years. Only 7.8 per cent of physicians (n=58) categorically advocated banning pioglitazone, and the rest opined for its continuation or generating more evidence before decision could be taken regarding its use in T2DM. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the physicians though were aware of the regulatory changes with regard to pioglitazone, but their prescribing patterns were not changed for this drug. However, it was being used at lower than the recommended dose. There is a need for generating more evidence through improved pharmacovigilance activities and large-scale population-based prospective studies regarding the safety issues of pioglitazone, so as to make effectual risk-benefit analysis for its continual use in T2DM. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5819028/ /pubmed/29434060 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1416_15 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Goyal, Aman Singh, Harmanjit Sehgal, Vijay Kumar Jayanthi, C.R. Munshi, Renuka Bairy, K. Laxminarayana Kumar, Rakesh Kaushal, Sandeep Kakkar, Ashish Kumar Ambwani, Sneha Goyal, Chhaya Mazumdar, Goutameswar Adhikari, Anjan Das, Nina Stephy, Divya John Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan Dhasmana, D.C. Rehman, Shakil U. Chakrabarti, Amit Bhandare, Basavaraj Badyal, Dinesh Kumar Kaur, Inderpal Chandrashekar, K. Singh, Jagjit Dhamija, Puneet Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra Gupta, Yogendra Kumar Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study |
title | Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study |
title_full | Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study |
title_fullStr | Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study |
title_short | Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study |
title_sort | impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in india: a multicentre questionnaire-based observational study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434060 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1416_15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goyalaman impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT singhharmanjit impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT sehgalvijaykumar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT jayanthicr impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT munshirenuka impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT bairyklaxminarayana impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT kumarrakesh impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT kaushalsandeep impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT kakkarashishkumar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT ambwanisneha impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT goyalchhaya impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT mazumdargoutameswar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT adhikarianjan impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT dasnina impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT stephydivyajohn impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT thangarajupugazhenthan impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT dhasmanadc impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT rehmanshakilu impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT chakrabartiamit impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT bhandarebasavaraj impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT badyaldineshkumar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT kaurinderpal impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT chandrashekark impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT singhjagjit impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT dhamijapuneet impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT sarangisudhirchandra impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy AT guptayogendrakumar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy |