Cargando…

Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pioglitazone was suspended for manufacture and sale by the Indian drug regulator in June 2013 due to its association with urinary bladder carcinoma, which was revoked within a short period (July 2013). The present questionnaire-based nationwide study was conducted to ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goyal, Aman, Singh, Harmanjit, Sehgal, Vijay Kumar, Jayanthi, C.R., Munshi, Renuka, Bairy, K. Laxminarayana, Kumar, Rakesh, Kaushal, Sandeep, Kakkar, Ashish Kumar, Ambwani, Sneha, Goyal, Chhaya, Mazumdar, Goutameswar, Adhikari, Anjan, Das, Nina, Stephy, Divya John, Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan, Dhasmana, D.C., Rehman, Shakil U., Chakrabarti, Amit, Bhandare, Basavaraj, Badyal, Dinesh Kumar, Kaur, Inderpal, Chandrashekar, K., Singh, Jagjit, Dhamija, Puneet, Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra, Gupta, Yogendra Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434060
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1416_15
_version_ 1783301126237454336
author Goyal, Aman
Singh, Harmanjit
Sehgal, Vijay Kumar
Jayanthi, C.R.
Munshi, Renuka
Bairy, K. Laxminarayana
Kumar, Rakesh
Kaushal, Sandeep
Kakkar, Ashish Kumar
Ambwani, Sneha
Goyal, Chhaya
Mazumdar, Goutameswar
Adhikari, Anjan
Das, Nina
Stephy, Divya John
Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan
Dhasmana, D.C.
Rehman, Shakil U.
Chakrabarti, Amit
Bhandare, Basavaraj
Badyal, Dinesh Kumar
Kaur, Inderpal
Chandrashekar, K.
Singh, Jagjit
Dhamija, Puneet
Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra
Gupta, Yogendra Kumar
author_facet Goyal, Aman
Singh, Harmanjit
Sehgal, Vijay Kumar
Jayanthi, C.R.
Munshi, Renuka
Bairy, K. Laxminarayana
Kumar, Rakesh
Kaushal, Sandeep
Kakkar, Ashish Kumar
Ambwani, Sneha
Goyal, Chhaya
Mazumdar, Goutameswar
Adhikari, Anjan
Das, Nina
Stephy, Divya John
Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan
Dhasmana, D.C.
Rehman, Shakil U.
Chakrabarti, Amit
Bhandare, Basavaraj
Badyal, Dinesh Kumar
Kaur, Inderpal
Chandrashekar, K.
Singh, Jagjit
Dhamija, Puneet
Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra
Gupta, Yogendra Kumar
author_sort Goyal, Aman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pioglitazone was suspended for manufacture and sale by the Indian drug regulator in June 2013 due to its association with urinary bladder carcinoma, which was revoked within a short period (July 2013). The present questionnaire-based nationwide study was conducted to assess its impact on prescribing behaviour of physicians in India. METHODS: Between December 2013 and March 2014, a validated questionnaire was administered to physicians practicing diabetes across 25 centres in India. Seven hundred and forty questionnaires fulfilling the minimum quality criteria were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixteen (56.2%) physicians prescribed pioglitazone. Of these, 281 used it in less than the recommended dose of 15 mg/day. Most physicians (94.3%) were aware of recent regulatory events. However, only 333 (44.8%) changed their prescribing pattern. Seventeen of the 416 (4.1%) physicians who prescribed pioglitazone admitted having come across at least one type 2 diabetes mellitus patient (T2DM) who had urinary bladder carcinoma, and of these 13 said that it was in patients who took pioglitazone for a duration of more than two years. Only 7.8 per cent of physicians (n=58) categorically advocated banning pioglitazone, and the rest opined for its continuation or generating more evidence before decision could be taken regarding its use in T2DM. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the physicians though were aware of the regulatory changes with regard to pioglitazone, but their prescribing patterns were not changed for this drug. However, it was being used at lower than the recommended dose. There is a need for generating more evidence through improved pharmacovigilance activities and large-scale population-based prospective studies regarding the safety issues of pioglitazone, so as to make effectual risk-benefit analysis for its continual use in T2DM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5819028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58190282018-02-22 Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study Goyal, Aman Singh, Harmanjit Sehgal, Vijay Kumar Jayanthi, C.R. Munshi, Renuka Bairy, K. Laxminarayana Kumar, Rakesh Kaushal, Sandeep Kakkar, Ashish Kumar Ambwani, Sneha Goyal, Chhaya Mazumdar, Goutameswar Adhikari, Anjan Das, Nina Stephy, Divya John Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan Dhasmana, D.C. Rehman, Shakil U. Chakrabarti, Amit Bhandare, Basavaraj Badyal, Dinesh Kumar Kaur, Inderpal Chandrashekar, K. Singh, Jagjit Dhamija, Puneet Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra Gupta, Yogendra Kumar Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pioglitazone was suspended for manufacture and sale by the Indian drug regulator in June 2013 due to its association with urinary bladder carcinoma, which was revoked within a short period (July 2013). The present questionnaire-based nationwide study was conducted to assess its impact on prescribing behaviour of physicians in India. METHODS: Between December 2013 and March 2014, a validated questionnaire was administered to physicians practicing diabetes across 25 centres in India. Seven hundred and forty questionnaires fulfilling the minimum quality criteria were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixteen (56.2%) physicians prescribed pioglitazone. Of these, 281 used it in less than the recommended dose of 15 mg/day. Most physicians (94.3%) were aware of recent regulatory events. However, only 333 (44.8%) changed their prescribing pattern. Seventeen of the 416 (4.1%) physicians who prescribed pioglitazone admitted having come across at least one type 2 diabetes mellitus patient (T2DM) who had urinary bladder carcinoma, and of these 13 said that it was in patients who took pioglitazone for a duration of more than two years. Only 7.8 per cent of physicians (n=58) categorically advocated banning pioglitazone, and the rest opined for its continuation or generating more evidence before decision could be taken regarding its use in T2DM. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the physicians though were aware of the regulatory changes with regard to pioglitazone, but their prescribing patterns were not changed for this drug. However, it was being used at lower than the recommended dose. There is a need for generating more evidence through improved pharmacovigilance activities and large-scale population-based prospective studies regarding the safety issues of pioglitazone, so as to make effectual risk-benefit analysis for its continual use in T2DM. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5819028/ /pubmed/29434060 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1416_15 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goyal, Aman
Singh, Harmanjit
Sehgal, Vijay Kumar
Jayanthi, C.R.
Munshi, Renuka
Bairy, K. Laxminarayana
Kumar, Rakesh
Kaushal, Sandeep
Kakkar, Ashish Kumar
Ambwani, Sneha
Goyal, Chhaya
Mazumdar, Goutameswar
Adhikari, Anjan
Das, Nina
Stephy, Divya John
Thangaraju, Pugazhenthan
Dhasmana, D.C.
Rehman, Shakil U.
Chakrabarti, Amit
Bhandare, Basavaraj
Badyal, Dinesh Kumar
Kaur, Inderpal
Chandrashekar, K.
Singh, Jagjit
Dhamija, Puneet
Sarangi, Sudhir Chandra
Gupta, Yogendra Kumar
Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study
title Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study
title_full Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study
title_fullStr Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study
title_short Impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in India: A multicentre questionnaire-based observational study
title_sort impact of regulatory spin of pioglitazone on prescription of antidiabetic drugs among physicians in india: a multicentre questionnaire-based observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434060
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1416_15
work_keys_str_mv AT goyalaman impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT singhharmanjit impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT sehgalvijaykumar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT jayanthicr impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT munshirenuka impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT bairyklaxminarayana impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT kumarrakesh impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT kaushalsandeep impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT kakkarashishkumar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT ambwanisneha impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT goyalchhaya impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT mazumdargoutameswar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT adhikarianjan impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT dasnina impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT stephydivyajohn impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT thangarajupugazhenthan impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT dhasmanadc impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT rehmanshakilu impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT chakrabartiamit impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT bhandarebasavaraj impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT badyaldineshkumar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT kaurinderpal impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT chandrashekark impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT singhjagjit impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT dhamijapuneet impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT sarangisudhirchandra impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy
AT guptayogendrakumar impactofregulatoryspinofpioglitazoneonprescriptionofantidiabeticdrugsamongphysiciansinindiaamulticentrequestionnairebasedobservationalstudy