Cargando…

A pilot study regarding basic knowledge of “cortical visual impairment in children” among ophthalmologists

PURPOSE: A pilot study was done to evaluate knowledge regarding “cortical visual impairment (CVI) in children” among ophthalmologists. METHODS: This study was conducted during the annual conference of a zonal ophthalmological society. All ophthalmologists who attended the conference were requested t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maitreya, Amit, Rawat, Darshika, Pandey, Shubham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29380776
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_425_17
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: A pilot study was done to evaluate knowledge regarding “cortical visual impairment (CVI) in children” among ophthalmologists. METHODS: This study was conducted during the annual conference of a zonal ophthalmological society. All ophthalmologists who attended the conference were requested to participate in this study. Those who agreed were given a validated questionnaire to assess knowledge regarding CVI. Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire was 0.6. Participants were asked to respond to multiple choice questions by choosing the single best option. The responses obtained were then evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of registered delegates in the conference was 448. A total of 103 ophthalmologists showed interest to participate in the study with a response rate of 22.9%. Only 89/103 interested delegates were included in the study as remaining were unaware of CVI. No participant gave correct answers to all questions. Although more than 80% of them knew the most common association (87%) and site of pathology (84%), only 52% were sure about clinical features and even lesser respondents (39%) knew that magnetic resonance imaging is the correct investigation of choice. The majority responded correctly that these children need eye examination (89%) and can be managed by rehabilitation through multidisciplinary approach (82%), but only 58% could recognize differential diagnoses and had a correct idea regarding the prognosis of CVI. There was no correlation between the number of patients diagnosed per month by the respondent with knowledge of the disease. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, ophthalmologists were found to have limited knowledge regarding clinical features, investigation, differential diagnosis, and visual prognosis of CVI in children. There is a need to improve awareness regarding CVI among ophthalmologists.