Cargando…
Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the commonest arrhythmia which raises the risk of heart failure, thromboembolic stroke, morbidity and death. Pharmacological treatments of this condition are focused on heart rate control, rhythm control and reduction in risk of stroke. Selective ablation of cardia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29458408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9 |
_version_ | 1783301167927787520 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Habib Rehman Kralj-Hans, Ines Haldar, Shouvik Bahrami, Toufan Clague, Jonathan De Souza, Anthony Francis, Darrel Hussain, Wajid Jarman, Julian Jones, David Gareth Mediratta, Neeraj Mohiaddin, Raad Salukhe, Tushar Jones, Simon Lord, Joanne Murphy, Caroline Kelly, Joanna Markides, Vias Gupta, Dhiraj Wong, Tom |
author_facet | Khan, Habib Rehman Kralj-Hans, Ines Haldar, Shouvik Bahrami, Toufan Clague, Jonathan De Souza, Anthony Francis, Darrel Hussain, Wajid Jarman, Julian Jones, David Gareth Mediratta, Neeraj Mohiaddin, Raad Salukhe, Tushar Jones, Simon Lord, Joanne Murphy, Caroline Kelly, Joanna Markides, Vias Gupta, Dhiraj Wong, Tom |
author_sort | Khan, Habib Rehman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the commonest arrhythmia which raises the risk of heart failure, thromboembolic stroke, morbidity and death. Pharmacological treatments of this condition are focused on heart rate control, rhythm control and reduction in risk of stroke. Selective ablation of cardiac tissues resulting in isolation of areas causing atrial fibrillation is another treatment strategy which can be delivered by two minimally invasive interventions: percutaneous catheter ablation and thoracoscopic surgical ablation. The main purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two interventions. METHODS/DESIGN: Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF) is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial within three NHS tertiary cardiovascular centres specialising in treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eligible adults (n = 120) with symptomatic, long-standing, persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomly allocated to either catheter ablation or thoracoscopic ablation in a 1:1 ratio. Pre-determined lesion sets will be delivered in each treatment arm with confirmation of appropriate conduction block. All patients will have an implantable loop recorder (ILR) inserted subcutaneously immediately following ablation to enable continuous heart rhythm monitoring for at least 12 months. The devices will be programmed to detect episodes of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia ≥ 30 s in duration. The patients will be followed for 12 months, completing appropriate clinical assessments and questionnaires every 3 months. The ILR data will be wirelessly transmitted daily and evaluated every month for the duration of the follow-up. The primary endpoint in the study is freedom from atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia at the end of the follow-up period. DISCUSSION: The CASA-AF Trial is a National Institute for Health Research-funded study that will provide first-class evidence on the comparative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of thoracoscopic surgical ablation and conventional percutaneous catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. In addition, the results of the trial will provide information on the effects on patients’ quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN18250790. Registered on 24 April 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5819216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58192162018-02-21 Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Khan, Habib Rehman Kralj-Hans, Ines Haldar, Shouvik Bahrami, Toufan Clague, Jonathan De Souza, Anthony Francis, Darrel Hussain, Wajid Jarman, Julian Jones, David Gareth Mediratta, Neeraj Mohiaddin, Raad Salukhe, Tushar Jones, Simon Lord, Joanne Murphy, Caroline Kelly, Joanna Markides, Vias Gupta, Dhiraj Wong, Tom Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the commonest arrhythmia which raises the risk of heart failure, thromboembolic stroke, morbidity and death. Pharmacological treatments of this condition are focused on heart rate control, rhythm control and reduction in risk of stroke. Selective ablation of cardiac tissues resulting in isolation of areas causing atrial fibrillation is another treatment strategy which can be delivered by two minimally invasive interventions: percutaneous catheter ablation and thoracoscopic surgical ablation. The main purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two interventions. METHODS/DESIGN: Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF) is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial within three NHS tertiary cardiovascular centres specialising in treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eligible adults (n = 120) with symptomatic, long-standing, persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomly allocated to either catheter ablation or thoracoscopic ablation in a 1:1 ratio. Pre-determined lesion sets will be delivered in each treatment arm with confirmation of appropriate conduction block. All patients will have an implantable loop recorder (ILR) inserted subcutaneously immediately following ablation to enable continuous heart rhythm monitoring for at least 12 months. The devices will be programmed to detect episodes of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia ≥ 30 s in duration. The patients will be followed for 12 months, completing appropriate clinical assessments and questionnaires every 3 months. The ILR data will be wirelessly transmitted daily and evaluated every month for the duration of the follow-up. The primary endpoint in the study is freedom from atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia at the end of the follow-up period. DISCUSSION: The CASA-AF Trial is a National Institute for Health Research-funded study that will provide first-class evidence on the comparative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of thoracoscopic surgical ablation and conventional percutaneous catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. In addition, the results of the trial will provide information on the effects on patients’ quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN18250790. Registered on 24 April 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5819216/ /pubmed/29458408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Khan, Habib Rehman Kralj-Hans, Ines Haldar, Shouvik Bahrami, Toufan Clague, Jonathan De Souza, Anthony Francis, Darrel Hussain, Wajid Jarman, Julian Jones, David Gareth Mediratta, Neeraj Mohiaddin, Raad Salukhe, Tushar Jones, Simon Lord, Joanne Murphy, Caroline Kelly, Joanna Markides, Vias Gupta, Dhiraj Wong, Tom Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | catheter ablation versus thoracoscopic surgical ablation in long standing persistent atrial fibrillation (casa-af): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29458408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanhabibrehman catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kraljhansines catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haldarshouvik catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bahramitoufan catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT claguejonathan catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT desouzaanthony catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT francisdarrel catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hussainwajid catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jarmanjulian catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jonesdavidgareth catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT medirattaneeraj catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mohiaddinraad catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT salukhetushar catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jonessimon catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lordjoanne catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT murphycaroline catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kellyjoanna catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT markidesvias catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT guptadhiraj catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wongtom catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |