Cargando…

Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the commonest arrhythmia which raises the risk of heart failure, thromboembolic stroke, morbidity and death. Pharmacological treatments of this condition are focused on heart rate control, rhythm control and reduction in risk of stroke. Selective ablation of cardia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Habib Rehman, Kralj-Hans, Ines, Haldar, Shouvik, Bahrami, Toufan, Clague, Jonathan, De Souza, Anthony, Francis, Darrel, Hussain, Wajid, Jarman, Julian, Jones, David Gareth, Mediratta, Neeraj, Mohiaddin, Raad, Salukhe, Tushar, Jones, Simon, Lord, Joanne, Murphy, Caroline, Kelly, Joanna, Markides, Vias, Gupta, Dhiraj, Wong, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29458408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9
_version_ 1783301167927787520
author Khan, Habib Rehman
Kralj-Hans, Ines
Haldar, Shouvik
Bahrami, Toufan
Clague, Jonathan
De Souza, Anthony
Francis, Darrel
Hussain, Wajid
Jarman, Julian
Jones, David Gareth
Mediratta, Neeraj
Mohiaddin, Raad
Salukhe, Tushar
Jones, Simon
Lord, Joanne
Murphy, Caroline
Kelly, Joanna
Markides, Vias
Gupta, Dhiraj
Wong, Tom
author_facet Khan, Habib Rehman
Kralj-Hans, Ines
Haldar, Shouvik
Bahrami, Toufan
Clague, Jonathan
De Souza, Anthony
Francis, Darrel
Hussain, Wajid
Jarman, Julian
Jones, David Gareth
Mediratta, Neeraj
Mohiaddin, Raad
Salukhe, Tushar
Jones, Simon
Lord, Joanne
Murphy, Caroline
Kelly, Joanna
Markides, Vias
Gupta, Dhiraj
Wong, Tom
author_sort Khan, Habib Rehman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the commonest arrhythmia which raises the risk of heart failure, thromboembolic stroke, morbidity and death. Pharmacological treatments of this condition are focused on heart rate control, rhythm control and reduction in risk of stroke. Selective ablation of cardiac tissues resulting in isolation of areas causing atrial fibrillation is another treatment strategy which can be delivered by two minimally invasive interventions: percutaneous catheter ablation and thoracoscopic surgical ablation. The main purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two interventions. METHODS/DESIGN: Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF) is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial within three NHS tertiary cardiovascular centres specialising in treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eligible adults (n = 120) with symptomatic, long-standing, persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomly allocated to either catheter ablation or thoracoscopic ablation in a 1:1 ratio. Pre-determined lesion sets will be delivered in each treatment arm with confirmation of appropriate conduction block. All patients will have an implantable loop recorder (ILR) inserted subcutaneously immediately following ablation to enable continuous heart rhythm monitoring for at least 12 months. The devices will be programmed to detect episodes of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia ≥ 30 s in duration. The patients will be followed for 12 months, completing appropriate clinical assessments and questionnaires every 3 months. The ILR data will be wirelessly transmitted daily and evaluated every month for the duration of the follow-up. The primary endpoint in the study is freedom from atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia at the end of the follow-up period. DISCUSSION: The CASA-AF Trial is a National Institute for Health Research-funded study that will provide first-class evidence on the comparative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of thoracoscopic surgical ablation and conventional percutaneous catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. In addition, the results of the trial will provide information on the effects on patients’ quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN18250790. Registered on 24 April 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5819216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58192162018-02-21 Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Khan, Habib Rehman Kralj-Hans, Ines Haldar, Shouvik Bahrami, Toufan Clague, Jonathan De Souza, Anthony Francis, Darrel Hussain, Wajid Jarman, Julian Jones, David Gareth Mediratta, Neeraj Mohiaddin, Raad Salukhe, Tushar Jones, Simon Lord, Joanne Murphy, Caroline Kelly, Joanna Markides, Vias Gupta, Dhiraj Wong, Tom Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the commonest arrhythmia which raises the risk of heart failure, thromboembolic stroke, morbidity and death. Pharmacological treatments of this condition are focused on heart rate control, rhythm control and reduction in risk of stroke. Selective ablation of cardiac tissues resulting in isolation of areas causing atrial fibrillation is another treatment strategy which can be delivered by two minimally invasive interventions: percutaneous catheter ablation and thoracoscopic surgical ablation. The main purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two interventions. METHODS/DESIGN: Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF) is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial within three NHS tertiary cardiovascular centres specialising in treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eligible adults (n = 120) with symptomatic, long-standing, persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomly allocated to either catheter ablation or thoracoscopic ablation in a 1:1 ratio. Pre-determined lesion sets will be delivered in each treatment arm with confirmation of appropriate conduction block. All patients will have an implantable loop recorder (ILR) inserted subcutaneously immediately following ablation to enable continuous heart rhythm monitoring for at least 12 months. The devices will be programmed to detect episodes of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia ≥ 30 s in duration. The patients will be followed for 12 months, completing appropriate clinical assessments and questionnaires every 3 months. The ILR data will be wirelessly transmitted daily and evaluated every month for the duration of the follow-up. The primary endpoint in the study is freedom from atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia at the end of the follow-up period. DISCUSSION: The CASA-AF Trial is a National Institute for Health Research-funded study that will provide first-class evidence on the comparative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of thoracoscopic surgical ablation and conventional percutaneous catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. In addition, the results of the trial will provide information on the effects on patients’ quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN18250790. Registered on 24 April 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5819216/ /pubmed/29458408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Khan, Habib Rehman
Kralj-Hans, Ines
Haldar, Shouvik
Bahrami, Toufan
Clague, Jonathan
De Souza, Anthony
Francis, Darrel
Hussain, Wajid
Jarman, Julian
Jones, David Gareth
Mediratta, Neeraj
Mohiaddin, Raad
Salukhe, Tushar
Jones, Simon
Lord, Joanne
Murphy, Caroline
Kelly, Joanna
Markides, Vias
Gupta, Dhiraj
Wong, Tom
Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort catheter ablation versus thoracoscopic surgical ablation in long standing persistent atrial fibrillation (casa-af): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29458408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2487-9
work_keys_str_mv AT khanhabibrehman catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kraljhansines catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haldarshouvik catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bahramitoufan catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT claguejonathan catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT desouzaanthony catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT francisdarrel catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hussainwajid catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jarmanjulian catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jonesdavidgareth catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT medirattaneeraj catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mohiaddinraad catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT salukhetushar catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jonessimon catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lordjoanne catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT murphycaroline catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kellyjoanna catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT markidesvias catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT guptadhiraj catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wongtom catheterablationversusthoracoscopicsurgicalablationinlongstandingpersistentatrialfibrillationcasaafstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial