Cargando…
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in a treated versus non- treated cohort of women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus according to the HAPO 5 and 4 criteria
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the treatment effect of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome group (HAPO) screening. RESULTS: The prevalence of GDM, using HAPO 5 was 23.8%. Of these, 72.8% were treated. Comparison of outcomes between tr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universa Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479398 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the treatment effect of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome group (HAPO) screening. RESULTS: The prevalence of GDM, using HAPO 5 was 23.8%. Of these, 72.8% were treated. Comparison of outcomes between treated and untreated patients showed no differences. The prevalence of GDM according to HAPO 4 criteria was 16.9%. In the untreated group, there were more cases of (pre)eclampsia (P=0.038), more admissions to neonatal care department (P=0.036), pregnancy duration was shorter (P=0.05), and Apgar score at five minutes was significantly lower (P=0.019). The outcomes didn’t differ in the MAGG (midly aberrant glycemic group). CONCLUSIONS: Using HAPO 5 criteria in population-based screening doubled the prevalence of GDM. There were no differences between untreated and treated HAPO 5 and MAGG patients, while in the HAPO 4 group there might be a trend of therapy effectiveness. |
---|