Cargando…
Correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (SOET) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers.
INTRODUCTION: Serial measurements of the number of follicles and their growth by ultrasound is a standard way of monitoring fertility treatments using controlled ovarian stimulation. This is stressful for both the patient and the professional. Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET) is more...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universa Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479400 |
_version_ | 1783301193681862656 |
---|---|
author | Dalewyn, L Deschepper, E Gerris, J |
author_facet | Dalewyn, L Deschepper, E Gerris, J |
author_sort | Dalewyn, L |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Serial measurements of the number of follicles and their growth by ultrasound is a standard way of monitoring fertility treatments using controlled ovarian stimulation. This is stressful for both the patient and the professional. Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET) is more patient friendly and less time-consuming. AIM OF THE STUDY: The goal of the study is to see if there’s a correlation in the number of follicles and in two- dimensional growth between recordings made using SOET versus measurements performed by a professional sonographer. RESULTS: Three different ultrasound moments were recorded and compared in a total of 15 women. At time A an ultrasound was performed by the patient at home using SOET at the decision time of triggering. At time B an ultrasound was also recorded by the patient, 24 hours later. At time C an ultrasound was performed by a physician using a high end ultrasound device immediately prior to oocyte retrieval, 12 hours later than time B. The correlation in number and two-dimensional size between the different measurement moments was calculated. There is an excellent correlation in follicle count between time B and C. The difference in mean two-dimensional size between different measurement moments was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: SOET ultrasound correlates well with ultrasound performed by a professional in number of follicles. SOET is a good alternative for monitoring controlled ovarian stimulation in a well-defined population group of normal responders, especially near the end of the ovarian stimulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5819323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Universa Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58193232018-02-23 Correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (SOET) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers. Dalewyn, L Deschepper, E Gerris, J Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Serial measurements of the number of follicles and their growth by ultrasound is a standard way of monitoring fertility treatments using controlled ovarian stimulation. This is stressful for both the patient and the professional. Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET) is more patient friendly and less time-consuming. AIM OF THE STUDY: The goal of the study is to see if there’s a correlation in the number of follicles and in two- dimensional growth between recordings made using SOET versus measurements performed by a professional sonographer. RESULTS: Three different ultrasound moments were recorded and compared in a total of 15 women. At time A an ultrasound was performed by the patient at home using SOET at the decision time of triggering. At time B an ultrasound was also recorded by the patient, 24 hours later. At time C an ultrasound was performed by a physician using a high end ultrasound device immediately prior to oocyte retrieval, 12 hours later than time B. The correlation in number and two-dimensional size between the different measurement moments was calculated. There is an excellent correlation in follicle count between time B and C. The difference in mean two-dimensional size between different measurement moments was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: SOET ultrasound correlates well with ultrasound performed by a professional in number of follicles. SOET is a good alternative for monitoring controlled ovarian stimulation in a well-defined population group of normal responders, especially near the end of the ovarian stimulation. Universa Press 2017-09 2018-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5819323/ /pubmed/29479400 Text en Copyright © 2017 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Dalewyn, L Deschepper, E Gerris, J Correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (SOET) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers. |
title | Correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (SOET) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers. |
title_full | Correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (SOET) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers. |
title_fullStr | Correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (SOET) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers. |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (SOET) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers. |
title_short | Correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (SOET) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers. |
title_sort | correlation between follicle dimensions recorded by patients at home (soet) versus ultrasound performed by professional care providers. |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalewynl correlationbetweenfollicledimensionsrecordedbypatientsathomesoetversusultrasoundperformedbyprofessionalcareproviders AT descheppere correlationbetweenfollicledimensionsrecordedbypatientsathomesoetversusultrasoundperformedbyprofessionalcareproviders AT gerrisj correlationbetweenfollicledimensionsrecordedbypatientsathomesoetversusultrasoundperformedbyprofessionalcareproviders |