Cargando…

Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services

Payment for hydrological services (PHS) are popular tools for conserving ecosystems and their water-related services. However, improving the spatial targeting and impacts of PHS, as well as their ability to foster synergies with other ecosystem services (ES), remain challenging. We aimed at using sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mokondoko, Pierre, Manson, Robert H., Ricketts, Taylor H., Geissert, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192560
_version_ 1783301274233470976
author Mokondoko, Pierre
Manson, Robert H.
Ricketts, Taylor H.
Geissert, Daniel
author_facet Mokondoko, Pierre
Manson, Robert H.
Ricketts, Taylor H.
Geissert, Daniel
author_sort Mokondoko, Pierre
collection PubMed
description Payment for hydrological services (PHS) are popular tools for conserving ecosystems and their water-related services. However, improving the spatial targeting and impacts of PHS, as well as their ability to foster synergies with other ecosystem services (ES), remain challenging. We aimed at using spatial analyses to evaluate the targeting performance of México’s National PHS program in central Veracruz. We quantified the effectiveness of areas targeted for PHS in actually covering areas of high HS provision and social priority during 2003–2013. First, we quantified provisioning and spatial distributions of two target (water yield and soil retention), and one non-target ES (carbon storage) using InVEST. Subsequently, pairwise relationships among ES were quantified by using spatial correlation and overlap analyses. Finally, we evaluated targeting by: (i) prioritizing areas of individual and overlapping ES; (ii) quantifying spatial co-occurrences of these priority areas with those targeted by PHS; (iii) evaluating the extent to which PHS directly contribute to HS delivery; and (iv), testing if PHS targeted areas disproportionately covered areas with high ecological and social priority. We found that modelled priority areas exhibited non-random distributions and distinct spatial patterns. Our results show significant pairwise correlations between all ES suggesting synergistic relationships. However, our analysis showed a significantly lower overlap than expected and thus significant mismatches between PHS targeted areas and all types of priority areas. These findings suggest that the targeting of areas with high HS provisioning and social priority by Mexico’s PHS program could be improved significantly. This study underscores: (1) the importance of using maps of HS provisioning as main targeting criteria in PHS design to channel payments towards areas that require future conservation, and (2) the need for future research that helps balance ecological and socioeconomic targeting criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5819813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58198132018-03-15 Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services Mokondoko, Pierre Manson, Robert H. Ricketts, Taylor H. Geissert, Daniel PLoS One Research Article Payment for hydrological services (PHS) are popular tools for conserving ecosystems and their water-related services. However, improving the spatial targeting and impacts of PHS, as well as their ability to foster synergies with other ecosystem services (ES), remain challenging. We aimed at using spatial analyses to evaluate the targeting performance of México’s National PHS program in central Veracruz. We quantified the effectiveness of areas targeted for PHS in actually covering areas of high HS provision and social priority during 2003–2013. First, we quantified provisioning and spatial distributions of two target (water yield and soil retention), and one non-target ES (carbon storage) using InVEST. Subsequently, pairwise relationships among ES were quantified by using spatial correlation and overlap analyses. Finally, we evaluated targeting by: (i) prioritizing areas of individual and overlapping ES; (ii) quantifying spatial co-occurrences of these priority areas with those targeted by PHS; (iii) evaluating the extent to which PHS directly contribute to HS delivery; and (iv), testing if PHS targeted areas disproportionately covered areas with high ecological and social priority. We found that modelled priority areas exhibited non-random distributions and distinct spatial patterns. Our results show significant pairwise correlations between all ES suggesting synergistic relationships. However, our analysis showed a significantly lower overlap than expected and thus significant mismatches between PHS targeted areas and all types of priority areas. These findings suggest that the targeting of areas with high HS provisioning and social priority by Mexico’s PHS program could be improved significantly. This study underscores: (1) the importance of using maps of HS provisioning as main targeting criteria in PHS design to channel payments towards areas that require future conservation, and (2) the need for future research that helps balance ecological and socioeconomic targeting criteria. Public Library of Science 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5819813/ /pubmed/29462205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192560 Text en © 2018 Mokondoko et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mokondoko, Pierre
Manson, Robert H.
Ricketts, Taylor H.
Geissert, Daniel
Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services
title Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services
title_full Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services
title_fullStr Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services
title_full_unstemmed Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services
title_short Spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services
title_sort spatial analysis of ecosystem service relationships to improve targeting of payments for hydrological services
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192560
work_keys_str_mv AT mokondokopierre spatialanalysisofecosystemservicerelationshipstoimprovetargetingofpaymentsforhydrologicalservices
AT mansonroberth spatialanalysisofecosystemservicerelationshipstoimprovetargetingofpaymentsforhydrologicalservices
AT rickettstaylorh spatialanalysisofecosystemservicerelationshipstoimprovetargetingofpaymentsforhydrologicalservices
AT geissertdaniel spatialanalysisofecosystemservicerelationshipstoimprovetargetingofpaymentsforhydrologicalservices