Cargando…

Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Multiple Metastases: Importance of Volume Rather Than Number of Lesions

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of multiple brain metastases is controversial. While whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has historically been the mainstay of treatment, its value is increasingly being questioned as emerging data supports that SRS alone can provide comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahshan, Basem A, Mattes, Malcolm D, Bhatia, Sanjay, Palek, Mary Susan, Cifarelli, Christopher P, Hack, Joshua D, Vargo, John A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29492355
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1966
_version_ 1783301315688923136
author Dahshan, Basem A
Mattes, Malcolm D
Bhatia, Sanjay
Palek, Mary Susan
Cifarelli, Christopher P
Hack, Joshua D
Vargo, John A
author_facet Dahshan, Basem A
Mattes, Malcolm D
Bhatia, Sanjay
Palek, Mary Susan
Cifarelli, Christopher P
Hack, Joshua D
Vargo, John A
author_sort Dahshan, Basem A
collection PubMed
description The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of multiple brain metastases is controversial. While whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has historically been the mainstay of treatment, its value is increasingly being questioned as emerging data supports that SRS alone can provide comparable therapeutic outcomes for limited (one to three) intracranial metastases with fewer adverse effects, including neurocognitive decline. Multiple recent studies have also demonstrated that patients with multiple (> 3) intracranial metastases with a low overall tumor volume have a favorable therapeutic response to SRS, with no significant difference compared to patients with limited metastases. Herein, we present a patient with previously controlled breast cancer who presented with multiple recurrences of intracranial metastases but low total intracranial tumor volume each time. This patient underwent SRS alone for a total of 40 metastatic lesions over three separate procedures with good local control and without any significant cognitive toxicity. The patient eventually opted for enrollment in the NRG-CC001 clinical trial after multiple cranial recurrences. She received conventional WBRT with six months of memantine and developed significant neurocognitive side effects. This case highlights the growing body of literature supporting the role of SRS alone in the management of multiple brain metastases and the importance of maximizing neurocognition as advances in systemic therapies prolong survival in Stage IV cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5820093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58200932018-02-28 Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Multiple Metastases: Importance of Volume Rather Than Number of Lesions Dahshan, Basem A Mattes, Malcolm D Bhatia, Sanjay Palek, Mary Susan Cifarelli, Christopher P Hack, Joshua D Vargo, John A Cureus Radiation Oncology The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of multiple brain metastases is controversial. While whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has historically been the mainstay of treatment, its value is increasingly being questioned as emerging data supports that SRS alone can provide comparable therapeutic outcomes for limited (one to three) intracranial metastases with fewer adverse effects, including neurocognitive decline. Multiple recent studies have also demonstrated that patients with multiple (> 3) intracranial metastases with a low overall tumor volume have a favorable therapeutic response to SRS, with no significant difference compared to patients with limited metastases. Herein, we present a patient with previously controlled breast cancer who presented with multiple recurrences of intracranial metastases but low total intracranial tumor volume each time. This patient underwent SRS alone for a total of 40 metastatic lesions over three separate procedures with good local control and without any significant cognitive toxicity. The patient eventually opted for enrollment in the NRG-CC001 clinical trial after multiple cranial recurrences. She received conventional WBRT with six months of memantine and developed significant neurocognitive side effects. This case highlights the growing body of literature supporting the role of SRS alone in the management of multiple brain metastases and the importance of maximizing neurocognition as advances in systemic therapies prolong survival in Stage IV cancer. Cureus 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5820093/ /pubmed/29492355 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1966 Text en Copyright © 2017, Dahshan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology
Dahshan, Basem A
Mattes, Malcolm D
Bhatia, Sanjay
Palek, Mary Susan
Cifarelli, Christopher P
Hack, Joshua D
Vargo, John A
Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Multiple Metastases: Importance of Volume Rather Than Number of Lesions
title Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Multiple Metastases: Importance of Volume Rather Than Number of Lesions
title_full Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Multiple Metastases: Importance of Volume Rather Than Number of Lesions
title_fullStr Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Multiple Metastases: Importance of Volume Rather Than Number of Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Multiple Metastases: Importance of Volume Rather Than Number of Lesions
title_short Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Multiple Metastases: Importance of Volume Rather Than Number of Lesions
title_sort efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with multiple metastases: importance of volume rather than number of lesions
topic Radiation Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29492355
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1966
work_keys_str_mv AT dahshanbasema efficacyofstereotacticradiosurgeryinpatientswithmultiplemetastasesimportanceofvolumeratherthannumberoflesions
AT mattesmalcolmd efficacyofstereotacticradiosurgeryinpatientswithmultiplemetastasesimportanceofvolumeratherthannumberoflesions
AT bhatiasanjay efficacyofstereotacticradiosurgeryinpatientswithmultiplemetastasesimportanceofvolumeratherthannumberoflesions
AT palekmarysusan efficacyofstereotacticradiosurgeryinpatientswithmultiplemetastasesimportanceofvolumeratherthannumberoflesions
AT cifarellichristopherp efficacyofstereotacticradiosurgeryinpatientswithmultiplemetastasesimportanceofvolumeratherthannumberoflesions
AT hackjoshuad efficacyofstereotacticradiosurgeryinpatientswithmultiplemetastasesimportanceofvolumeratherthannumberoflesions
AT vargojohna efficacyofstereotacticradiosurgeryinpatientswithmultiplemetastasesimportanceofvolumeratherthannumberoflesions