Cargando…

Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age

Following up on the encouraging results of residue‐residue contact prediction in the CASP11 experiment, we present the analysis of predictions submitted for CASP12. The submissions include predictions of 34 groups for 38 domains classified as free modeling targets which are not accessible to homolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaarschmidt, Joerg, Monastyrskyy, Bohdan, Kryshtafovych, Andriy, Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.25407
_version_ 1783301319262470144
author Schaarschmidt, Joerg
Monastyrskyy, Bohdan
Kryshtafovych, Andriy
Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
author_facet Schaarschmidt, Joerg
Monastyrskyy, Bohdan
Kryshtafovych, Andriy
Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
author_sort Schaarschmidt, Joerg
collection PubMed
description Following up on the encouraging results of residue‐residue contact prediction in the CASP11 experiment, we present the analysis of predictions submitted for CASP12. The submissions include predictions of 34 groups for 38 domains classified as free modeling targets which are not accessible to homology‐based modeling due to a lack of structural templates. CASP11 saw a rise of coevolution‐based methods outperforming other approaches. The improvement of these methods coupled to machine learning and sequence database growth are most likely the main driver for a significant improvement in average precision from 27% in CASP11 to 47% in CASP12. In more than half of the targets, especially those with many homologous sequences accessible, precisions above 90% were achieved with the best predictors reaching a precision of 100% in some cases. We furthermore tested the impact of using these contacts as restraints in ab initio modeling of 14 single‐domain free modeling targets using Rosetta. Adding contacts to the Rosetta calculations resulted in improvements of up to 26% in GDT_TS within the top five structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5820169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58201692018-03-12 Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age Schaarschmidt, Joerg Monastyrskyy, Bohdan Kryshtafovych, Andriy Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J. Proteins Research Articles Following up on the encouraging results of residue‐residue contact prediction in the CASP11 experiment, we present the analysis of predictions submitted for CASP12. The submissions include predictions of 34 groups for 38 domains classified as free modeling targets which are not accessible to homology‐based modeling due to a lack of structural templates. CASP11 saw a rise of coevolution‐based methods outperforming other approaches. The improvement of these methods coupled to machine learning and sequence database growth are most likely the main driver for a significant improvement in average precision from 27% in CASP11 to 47% in CASP12. In more than half of the targets, especially those with many homologous sequences accessible, precisions above 90% were achieved with the best predictors reaching a precision of 100% in some cases. We furthermore tested the impact of using these contacts as restraints in ab initio modeling of 14 single‐domain free modeling targets using Rosetta. Adding contacts to the Rosetta calculations resulted in improvements of up to 26% in GDT_TS within the top five structures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-07 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5820169/ /pubmed/29071738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.25407 Text en © 2017 The Authors Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Schaarschmidt, Joerg
Monastyrskyy, Bohdan
Kryshtafovych, Andriy
Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age
title Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age
title_full Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age
title_fullStr Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age
title_short Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age
title_sort assessment of contact predictions in casp12: co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.25407
work_keys_str_mv AT schaarschmidtjoerg assessmentofcontactpredictionsincasp12coevolutionanddeeplearningcomingofage
AT monastyrskyybohdan assessmentofcontactpredictionsincasp12coevolutionanddeeplearningcomingofage
AT kryshtafovychandriy assessmentofcontactpredictionsincasp12coevolutionanddeeplearningcomingofage
AT bonvinalexandremjj assessmentofcontactpredictionsincasp12coevolutionanddeeplearningcomingofage