Cargando…

Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load

Monitoring visual displays while performing other tasks is commonplace in many operational environments. Although dividing attention between tasks can impair monitoring accuracy and response times, it is unclear whether it also reduces processing efficiency for visual targets. Thus, the current thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morey, Stephanie A., Thomas, Nicole A., McCarley, Jason S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0088-x
_version_ 1783301355168858112
author Morey, Stephanie A.
Thomas, Nicole A.
McCarley, Jason S.
author_facet Morey, Stephanie A.
Thomas, Nicole A.
McCarley, Jason S.
author_sort Morey, Stephanie A.
collection PubMed
description Monitoring visual displays while performing other tasks is commonplace in many operational environments. Although dividing attention between tasks can impair monitoring accuracy and response times, it is unclear whether it also reduces processing efficiency for visual targets. Thus, the current three experiments examined the effects of dual-tasking on target processing in the visual periphery. A total of 120 undergraduate students performed a redundant-target task either by itself (Experiment 1a) or in conjunction with a manual tracking task (Experiments 1b–3). Target processing efficiency was assessed using measures of workload resilience. Processing of redundant targets in Experiments 1–2 was less efficient than predicted by a standard parallel race model, giving evidence for limited-capacity, parallel processing. However, when stimulus characteristics forced participants to process targets in serial (Experiment 3), processing efficiency became super-capacity. Across the three experiments, dual-tasking had no effect on target processing efficiency. Results suggest that a central task slows target detection in the display periphery, but does not change the efficiency with which multiple concurrent targets are processed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5820380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58203802018-02-27 Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load Morey, Stephanie A. Thomas, Nicole A. McCarley, Jason S. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article Monitoring visual displays while performing other tasks is commonplace in many operational environments. Although dividing attention between tasks can impair monitoring accuracy and response times, it is unclear whether it also reduces processing efficiency for visual targets. Thus, the current three experiments examined the effects of dual-tasking on target processing in the visual periphery. A total of 120 undergraduate students performed a redundant-target task either by itself (Experiment 1a) or in conjunction with a manual tracking task (Experiments 1b–3). Target processing efficiency was assessed using measures of workload resilience. Processing of redundant targets in Experiments 1–2 was less efficient than predicted by a standard parallel race model, giving evidence for limited-capacity, parallel processing. However, when stimulus characteristics forced participants to process targets in serial (Experiment 3), processing efficiency became super-capacity. Across the three experiments, dual-tasking had no effect on target processing efficiency. Results suggest that a central task slows target detection in the display periphery, but does not change the efficiency with which multiple concurrent targets are processed. Springer International Publishing 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5820380/ /pubmed/29497688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0088-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Morey, Stephanie A.
Thomas, Nicole A.
McCarley, Jason S.
Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load
title Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load
title_full Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load
title_fullStr Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load
title_full_unstemmed Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load
title_short Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load
title_sort redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0088-x
work_keys_str_mv AT moreystephaniea redundanttargetprocessingisrobustagainstchangestotaskload
AT thomasnicolea redundanttargetprocessingisrobustagainstchangestotaskload
AT mccarleyjasons redundanttargetprocessingisrobustagainstchangestotaskload