Cargando…
Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up
BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy has recently been reported to be the preferred type of surgery among breast-specific surgeons and plastic surgeons. AIMS: To explore the significant clinicopathological factors associated with long-term outcome related to local recurre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28958980 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0029 |
_version_ | 1783301372629745664 |
---|---|
author | Özkurt, Enver Tükenmez, Mustafa Güven, Erdem Çelet Özden, Burcu Öner, Gizem Müslümanoğlu, Mahmut İğci, Abdullah Özmen, Vahit Küçücük, Seden Cabioğlu, Neslihan |
author_facet | Özkurt, Enver Tükenmez, Mustafa Güven, Erdem Çelet Özden, Burcu Öner, Gizem Müslümanoğlu, Mahmut İğci, Abdullah Özmen, Vahit Küçücük, Seden Cabioğlu, Neslihan |
author_sort | Özkurt, Enver |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy has recently been reported to be the preferred type of surgery among breast-specific surgeons and plastic surgeons. AIMS: To explore the significant clinicopathological factors associated with long-term outcome related to local recurrences of the nipple among patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander or implant after mastectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: From January 2007 to January 2013, 51 breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander or implant were retrospectively analysed. Patients’ demographic data, clinicopathological characteristics, and clinical outcome by disease-free survival and disease-specific survival analyses were determined. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 64 (31-114) months. Of the 57 mastectomies, 41 were skin sparing mastectomy (72%) and 16 were nipple-areola sparing mastectomy (28%). Immediate breast reconstruction surgery included tissue expander (n=46, 81%) or implant (n=11, 19%) placement. The molecular subgroups of 47 invasive cancers were as follows: luminal A (n=23, 49%), luminal B (n=16, 34%), non-luminal HER2 (n=5, 10.6), triple negative breast cancer (n=3, 6.4%). The 5-years disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 96.8%, 90%, and 97.6% respectively. Patients with luminal A cancer were found to have an improved 5-year disease-free survival time than other (luminal A; 100% vs. non-luminal A; 78%; p=0.028). Of the 14 nipple-areola sparing mastectomy, 13 had a close median tumour distance to nipple-areola complex (<20 mm) with a 5-year locoregional recurrence free survival of 100%. CONCLUSION: Immediate breast reconstruction with implant or tissue expander can be safely applied in patients undergoing skin sparing mastectomy or nipple-areola sparing mastectomy. Patients with luminal-A type show the most favourable outcome. During the 5-year follow-up period, patients even with close margins (<20 mm) to nipple-areola complex with nipple-areola sparing mastectomy have excellent locoregional and overall survival when treated by contemporary multidisciplinary oncological management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5820453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58204532018-03-16 Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up Özkurt, Enver Tükenmez, Mustafa Güven, Erdem Çelet Özden, Burcu Öner, Gizem Müslümanoğlu, Mahmut İğci, Abdullah Özmen, Vahit Küçücük, Seden Cabioğlu, Neslihan Balkan Med J Original Article BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy has recently been reported to be the preferred type of surgery among breast-specific surgeons and plastic surgeons. AIMS: To explore the significant clinicopathological factors associated with long-term outcome related to local recurrences of the nipple among patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander or implant after mastectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: From January 2007 to January 2013, 51 breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander or implant were retrospectively analysed. Patients’ demographic data, clinicopathological characteristics, and clinical outcome by disease-free survival and disease-specific survival analyses were determined. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 64 (31-114) months. Of the 57 mastectomies, 41 were skin sparing mastectomy (72%) and 16 were nipple-areola sparing mastectomy (28%). Immediate breast reconstruction surgery included tissue expander (n=46, 81%) or implant (n=11, 19%) placement. The molecular subgroups of 47 invasive cancers were as follows: luminal A (n=23, 49%), luminal B (n=16, 34%), non-luminal HER2 (n=5, 10.6), triple negative breast cancer (n=3, 6.4%). The 5-years disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 96.8%, 90%, and 97.6% respectively. Patients with luminal A cancer were found to have an improved 5-year disease-free survival time than other (luminal A; 100% vs. non-luminal A; 78%; p=0.028). Of the 14 nipple-areola sparing mastectomy, 13 had a close median tumour distance to nipple-areola complex (<20 mm) with a 5-year locoregional recurrence free survival of 100%. CONCLUSION: Immediate breast reconstruction with implant or tissue expander can be safely applied in patients undergoing skin sparing mastectomy or nipple-areola sparing mastectomy. Patients with luminal-A type show the most favourable outcome. During the 5-year follow-up period, patients even with close margins (<20 mm) to nipple-areola complex with nipple-areola sparing mastectomy have excellent locoregional and overall survival when treated by contemporary multidisciplinary oncological management. Galenos Publishing 2018-02 2018-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5820453/ /pubmed/28958980 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0029 Text en © Copyright 2018, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Balkan Medical Journal |
spellingShingle | Original Article Özkurt, Enver Tükenmez, Mustafa Güven, Erdem Çelet Özden, Burcu Öner, Gizem Müslümanoğlu, Mahmut İğci, Abdullah Özmen, Vahit Küçücük, Seden Cabioğlu, Neslihan Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up |
title | Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up |
title_full | Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up |
title_fullStr | Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up |
title_short | Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up |
title_sort | favorable outcome with close margins in patients undergoing nipple/skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: 5-year follow-up |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28958980 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozkurtenver favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT tukenmezmustafa favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT guvenerdem favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT celetozdenburcu favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT onergizem favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT muslumanoglumahmut favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT igciabdullah favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT ozmenvahit favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT kucucukseden favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup AT cabiogluneslihan favorableoutcomewithclosemarginsinpatientsundergoingnippleskinsparingmastectomywithimmediatebreastreconstruction5yearfollowup |