Cargando…
Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: A pilot study from Bangladesh
Introduction: Infections due to antibiotic resistant bacteria have increased alarmingly in both developed and developing countries. Unrestrained and rapidly spreading bacterial growth has turned the management of wound infections into a serious challenge. This study aimed to determine the prevalence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527295 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12887.1 |
_version_ | 1783301403270184960 |
---|---|
author | Roy, Sushmita Ahmed, Mejbah Uddin Uddin, Bhuiyan Mohammad Mahtab Ratan, Zubair Ahmed Rajawat, Monali Mehta, Varshil Zaman, Sojib Bin |
author_facet | Roy, Sushmita Ahmed, Mejbah Uddin Uddin, Bhuiyan Mohammad Mahtab Ratan, Zubair Ahmed Rajawat, Monali Mehta, Varshil Zaman, Sojib Bin |
author_sort | Roy, Sushmita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Infections due to antibiotic resistant bacteria have increased alarmingly in both developed and developing countries. Unrestrained and rapidly spreading bacterial growth has turned the management of wound infections into a serious challenge. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of different bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility in various types of wound infections. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to collect 105 wound swabs. All isolated bacteria were identified based on colony characteristics, gram stain and standard biochemical tests, and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) with the disc diffusion method. Descriptive statistics were used to present the study findings, and all analyses were performed using Stata Version 13. Results: The rate of isolation of bacteria was 92.3%. Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the most frequent isolate (55.7%), followed by Escherichia coli (23.7%), Pseudomonas spp. (8.2%), and Streptococcus pyogenes (7.2%). Gram-positive bacteria were mostly (60%) found sensitive to vancomycin, azithromycin, gentamicin, imipenem, cefixime, and ceftriaxone in this study. Among the Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli (>60%) showed sensitivity to cefixime, azithromycin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, gentamycin, and ceftazidime. Conclusions: The diversity of isolated bacteria and their susceptibility patterns signify a need to implement a proper infection control strategy, which can be achieved by carrying out antibiotic sensitivity tests of the isolates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5820593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58205932018-03-08 Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: A pilot study from Bangladesh Roy, Sushmita Ahmed, Mejbah Uddin Uddin, Bhuiyan Mohammad Mahtab Ratan, Zubair Ahmed Rajawat, Monali Mehta, Varshil Zaman, Sojib Bin F1000Res Research Article Introduction: Infections due to antibiotic resistant bacteria have increased alarmingly in both developed and developing countries. Unrestrained and rapidly spreading bacterial growth has turned the management of wound infections into a serious challenge. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of different bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility in various types of wound infections. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to collect 105 wound swabs. All isolated bacteria were identified based on colony characteristics, gram stain and standard biochemical tests, and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) with the disc diffusion method. Descriptive statistics were used to present the study findings, and all analyses were performed using Stata Version 13. Results: The rate of isolation of bacteria was 92.3%. Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the most frequent isolate (55.7%), followed by Escherichia coli (23.7%), Pseudomonas spp. (8.2%), and Streptococcus pyogenes (7.2%). Gram-positive bacteria were mostly (60%) found sensitive to vancomycin, azithromycin, gentamicin, imipenem, cefixime, and ceftriaxone in this study. Among the Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli (>60%) showed sensitivity to cefixime, azithromycin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, gentamycin, and ceftazidime. Conclusions: The diversity of isolated bacteria and their susceptibility patterns signify a need to implement a proper infection control strategy, which can be achieved by carrying out antibiotic sensitivity tests of the isolates. F1000 Research Limited 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5820593/ /pubmed/29527295 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12887.1 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Roy S et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Roy, Sushmita Ahmed, Mejbah Uddin Uddin, Bhuiyan Mohammad Mahtab Ratan, Zubair Ahmed Rajawat, Monali Mehta, Varshil Zaman, Sojib Bin Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: A pilot study from Bangladesh |
title | Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: A pilot study from Bangladesh |
title_full | Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: A pilot study from Bangladesh |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: A pilot study from Bangladesh |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: A pilot study from Bangladesh |
title_short | Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: A pilot study from Bangladesh |
title_sort | evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility in wound infections: a pilot study from bangladesh |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5820593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527295 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12887.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roysushmita evaluationofantibioticsusceptibilityinwoundinfectionsapilotstudyfrombangladesh AT ahmedmejbahuddin evaluationofantibioticsusceptibilityinwoundinfectionsapilotstudyfrombangladesh AT uddinbhuiyanmohammadmahtab evaluationofantibioticsusceptibilityinwoundinfectionsapilotstudyfrombangladesh AT ratanzubairahmed evaluationofantibioticsusceptibilityinwoundinfectionsapilotstudyfrombangladesh AT rajawatmonali evaluationofantibioticsusceptibilityinwoundinfectionsapilotstudyfrombangladesh AT mehtavarshil evaluationofantibioticsusceptibilityinwoundinfectionsapilotstudyfrombangladesh AT zamansojibbin evaluationofantibioticsusceptibilityinwoundinfectionsapilotstudyfrombangladesh |