Cargando…
A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
BACKGROUND: There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions. OBJECTIVE: To create and validate such a scale in a real population. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. Fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5821327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192306 |
_version_ | 1783301497205817344 |
---|---|
author | Sustersic, Mélanie Gauchet, Aurélie Kernou, Anaïs Gibert, Charlotte Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean-Luc |
author_facet | Sustersic, Mélanie Gauchet, Aurélie Kernou, Anaïs Gibert, Charlotte Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean-Luc |
author_sort | Sustersic, Mélanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions. OBJECTIVE: To create and validate such a scale in a real population. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. From these, using a theoretical model based on a multidisciplinary approach, we selected pertinent items that met the inclusion criteria and included them in a simple questionnaire. This tool based on a synthesis of the literature was then validated in a prospective study in two hospital emergency departments. RESULTS: We found 22 pertinent questionnaires and scoring systems. From these, we extracted items and built a scale based on 15 questions with graded responses (Likert from 1 to 4). The mean time for questionnaire completion was 3 minutes. We included 189 adults and adolescents in the study and analyzed complete responses to the questionnaire by 149 patients, gathered over the phone one week after their consultation. The scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89) and good external validity. Two questions were removed due to redundancy giving a scale based on 13 questions. CONCLUSIONS: We have created an easy-to-use and validated generic questionnaire to assess DPC in a context of acute conditions, usable both in clinical research and in routine practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5821327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58213272018-03-02 A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review Sustersic, Mélanie Gauchet, Aurélie Kernou, Anaïs Gibert, Charlotte Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean-Luc PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions. OBJECTIVE: To create and validate such a scale in a real population. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. From these, using a theoretical model based on a multidisciplinary approach, we selected pertinent items that met the inclusion criteria and included them in a simple questionnaire. This tool based on a synthesis of the literature was then validated in a prospective study in two hospital emergency departments. RESULTS: We found 22 pertinent questionnaires and scoring systems. From these, we extracted items and built a scale based on 15 questions with graded responses (Likert from 1 to 4). The mean time for questionnaire completion was 3 minutes. We included 189 adults and adolescents in the study and analyzed complete responses to the questionnaire by 149 patients, gathered over the phone one week after their consultation. The scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89) and good external validity. Two questions were removed due to redundancy giving a scale based on 13 questions. CONCLUSIONS: We have created an easy-to-use and validated generic questionnaire to assess DPC in a context of acute conditions, usable both in clinical research and in routine practice. Public Library of Science 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5821327/ /pubmed/29466407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192306 Text en © 2018 Sustersic et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sustersic, Mélanie Gauchet, Aurélie Kernou, Anaïs Gibert, Charlotte Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean-Luc A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review |
title | A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review |
title_full | A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review |
title_fullStr | A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review |
title_short | A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review |
title_sort | scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5821327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sustersicmelanie ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT gauchetaurelie ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT kernouanais ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT gibertcharlotte ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT footealison ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT vermorelceline ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT bossonjeanluc ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT sustersicmelanie scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT gauchetaurelie scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT kernouanais scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT gibertcharlotte scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT footealison scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT vermorelceline scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview AT bossonjeanluc scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview |