Cargando…

A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review

BACKGROUND: There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions. OBJECTIVE: To create and validate such a scale in a real population. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. Fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sustersic, Mélanie, Gauchet, Aurélie, Kernou, Anaïs, Gibert, Charlotte, Foote, Alison, Vermorel, Céline, Bosson, Jean-Luc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5821327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192306
_version_ 1783301497205817344
author Sustersic, Mélanie
Gauchet, Aurélie
Kernou, Anaïs
Gibert, Charlotte
Foote, Alison
Vermorel, Céline
Bosson, Jean-Luc
author_facet Sustersic, Mélanie
Gauchet, Aurélie
Kernou, Anaïs
Gibert, Charlotte
Foote, Alison
Vermorel, Céline
Bosson, Jean-Luc
author_sort Sustersic, Mélanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions. OBJECTIVE: To create and validate such a scale in a real population. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. From these, using a theoretical model based on a multidisciplinary approach, we selected pertinent items that met the inclusion criteria and included them in a simple questionnaire. This tool based on a synthesis of the literature was then validated in a prospective study in two hospital emergency departments. RESULTS: We found 22 pertinent questionnaires and scoring systems. From these, we extracted items and built a scale based on 15 questions with graded responses (Likert from 1 to 4). The mean time for questionnaire completion was 3 minutes. We included 189 adults and adolescents in the study and analyzed complete responses to the questionnaire by 149 patients, gathered over the phone one week after their consultation. The scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89) and good external validity. Two questions were removed due to redundancy giving a scale based on 13 questions. CONCLUSIONS: We have created an easy-to-use and validated generic questionnaire to assess DPC in a context of acute conditions, usable both in clinical research and in routine practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5821327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58213272018-03-02 A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review Sustersic, Mélanie Gauchet, Aurélie Kernou, Anaïs Gibert, Charlotte Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean-Luc PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions. OBJECTIVE: To create and validate such a scale in a real population. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. From these, using a theoretical model based on a multidisciplinary approach, we selected pertinent items that met the inclusion criteria and included them in a simple questionnaire. This tool based on a synthesis of the literature was then validated in a prospective study in two hospital emergency departments. RESULTS: We found 22 pertinent questionnaires and scoring systems. From these, we extracted items and built a scale based on 15 questions with graded responses (Likert from 1 to 4). The mean time for questionnaire completion was 3 minutes. We included 189 adults and adolescents in the study and analyzed complete responses to the questionnaire by 149 patients, gathered over the phone one week after their consultation. The scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89) and good external validity. Two questions were removed due to redundancy giving a scale based on 13 questions. CONCLUSIONS: We have created an easy-to-use and validated generic questionnaire to assess DPC in a context of acute conditions, usable both in clinical research and in routine practice. Public Library of Science 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5821327/ /pubmed/29466407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192306 Text en © 2018 Sustersic et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sustersic, Mélanie
Gauchet, Aurélie
Kernou, Anaïs
Gibert, Charlotte
Foote, Alison
Vermorel, Céline
Bosson, Jean-Luc
A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
title A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
title_full A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
title_fullStr A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
title_short A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
title_sort scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5821327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192306
work_keys_str_mv AT sustersicmelanie ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT gauchetaurelie ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT kernouanais ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT gibertcharlotte ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT footealison ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT vermorelceline ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT bossonjeanluc ascaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT sustersicmelanie scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT gauchetaurelie scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT kernouanais scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT gibertcharlotte scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT footealison scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT vermorelceline scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview
AT bossonjeanluc scaleassessingdoctorpatientcommunicationinacontextofacuteconditionsbasedonasystematicreview