Cargando…
Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, a key process in human cardiac disease, results from cellular (hypertrophy) and extracellular matrix expansion (interstitial fibrosis). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate whether human myocardial interstitial fibrosis in aortic stenosis (AS) i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Biomedical
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5821681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.035 |
_version_ | 1783301534065360896 |
---|---|
author | Treibel, Thomas A. Kozor, Rebecca Schofield, Rebecca Benedetti, Giulia Fontana, Marianna Bhuva, Anish N. Sheikh, Amir López, Begoña González, Arantxa Manisty, Charlotte Lloyd, Guy Kellman, Peter Díez, Javier Moon, James C. |
author_facet | Treibel, Thomas A. Kozor, Rebecca Schofield, Rebecca Benedetti, Giulia Fontana, Marianna Bhuva, Anish N. Sheikh, Amir López, Begoña González, Arantxa Manisty, Charlotte Lloyd, Guy Kellman, Peter Díez, Javier Moon, James C. |
author_sort | Treibel, Thomas A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, a key process in human cardiac disease, results from cellular (hypertrophy) and extracellular matrix expansion (interstitial fibrosis). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate whether human myocardial interstitial fibrosis in aortic stenosis (AS) is plastic and can regress. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic, severe AS (n = 181; aortic valve area index 0.4 ± 0.1 cm(2)/m(2)) were assessed pre–aortic valve replacement (AVR) by echocardiography (AS severity, diastology), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) (for volumes, function, and focal or diffuse fibrosis), biomarkers (N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin T), and the 6-min walk test. CMR was used to measure the extracellular volume fraction (ECV), thereby deriving matrix volume (LV mass × ECV) and cell volume (LV mass × [1 − ECV]). Biopsy excluded occult bystander disease. Assessment was repeated at 1 year post-AVR. RESULTS: At 1 year post-AVR in 116 pacemaker-free survivors (age 70 ± 10 years; 54% male), mean valve gradient had improved (48 ± 16 mm Hg to 12 ± 6 mm Hg; p < 0.001), and indexed LV mass had regressed by 19% (88 ± 26 g/m(2) to 71 ± 19 g/m(2); p < 0.001). Focal fibrosis by CMR late gadolinium enhancement did not change, but ECV increased (28.2 ± 2.9% to 29.9 ± 4.0%; p < 0.001): this was the result of a 16% reduction in matrix volume (25 ± 9 ml/m(2) to 21 ± 7 ml/m(2); p < 0.001) but a proportionally greater 22% reduction in cell volume (64 ± 18 ml/m(2) to 50 ± 13 ml/m(2); p < 0.001). These changes were accompanied by improvement in diastolic function, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-min walk test results, and New York Heart Association functional class. CONCLUSIONS: Post-AVR, focal fibrosis does not resolve, but diffuse fibrosis and myocardial cellular hypertrophy regress. Regression is accompanied by structural and functional improvements suggesting that human diffuse fibrosis is plastic, measurable by CMR and a potential therapeutic target. (Regression of Myocardial Fibrosis After Aortic Valve Replacement; NCT02174471) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5821681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier Biomedical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58216812018-02-27 Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Treibel, Thomas A. Kozor, Rebecca Schofield, Rebecca Benedetti, Giulia Fontana, Marianna Bhuva, Anish N. Sheikh, Amir López, Begoña González, Arantxa Manisty, Charlotte Lloyd, Guy Kellman, Peter Díez, Javier Moon, James C. J Am Coll Cardiol Article BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, a key process in human cardiac disease, results from cellular (hypertrophy) and extracellular matrix expansion (interstitial fibrosis). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate whether human myocardial interstitial fibrosis in aortic stenosis (AS) is plastic and can regress. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic, severe AS (n = 181; aortic valve area index 0.4 ± 0.1 cm(2)/m(2)) were assessed pre–aortic valve replacement (AVR) by echocardiography (AS severity, diastology), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) (for volumes, function, and focal or diffuse fibrosis), biomarkers (N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin T), and the 6-min walk test. CMR was used to measure the extracellular volume fraction (ECV), thereby deriving matrix volume (LV mass × ECV) and cell volume (LV mass × [1 − ECV]). Biopsy excluded occult bystander disease. Assessment was repeated at 1 year post-AVR. RESULTS: At 1 year post-AVR in 116 pacemaker-free survivors (age 70 ± 10 years; 54% male), mean valve gradient had improved (48 ± 16 mm Hg to 12 ± 6 mm Hg; p < 0.001), and indexed LV mass had regressed by 19% (88 ± 26 g/m(2) to 71 ± 19 g/m(2); p < 0.001). Focal fibrosis by CMR late gadolinium enhancement did not change, but ECV increased (28.2 ± 2.9% to 29.9 ± 4.0%; p < 0.001): this was the result of a 16% reduction in matrix volume (25 ± 9 ml/m(2) to 21 ± 7 ml/m(2); p < 0.001) but a proportionally greater 22% reduction in cell volume (64 ± 18 ml/m(2) to 50 ± 13 ml/m(2); p < 0.001). These changes were accompanied by improvement in diastolic function, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-min walk test results, and New York Heart Association functional class. CONCLUSIONS: Post-AVR, focal fibrosis does not resolve, but diffuse fibrosis and myocardial cellular hypertrophy regress. Regression is accompanied by structural and functional improvements suggesting that human diffuse fibrosis is plastic, measurable by CMR and a potential therapeutic target. (Regression of Myocardial Fibrosis After Aortic Valve Replacement; NCT02174471) Elsevier Biomedical 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5821681/ /pubmed/29471937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.035 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Treibel, Thomas A. Kozor, Rebecca Schofield, Rebecca Benedetti, Giulia Fontana, Marianna Bhuva, Anish N. Sheikh, Amir López, Begoña González, Arantxa Manisty, Charlotte Lloyd, Guy Kellman, Peter Díez, Javier Moon, James C. Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis |
title | Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis |
title_full | Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis |
title_fullStr | Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis |
title_short | Reverse Myocardial Remodeling Following Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis |
title_sort | reverse myocardial remodeling following valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5821681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT treibelthomasa reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT kozorrebecca reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT schofieldrebecca reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT benedettigiulia reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT fontanamarianna reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT bhuvaanishn reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT sheikhamir reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT lopezbegona reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT gonzalezarantxa reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT manistycharlotte reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT lloydguy reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT kellmanpeter reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT diezjavier reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis AT moonjamesc reversemyocardialremodelingfollowingvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis |