Cargando…
Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model
STUDY DESIGN: Mechanical study. PURPOSE: To compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Adequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augme...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5821930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29503676 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.3 |
_version_ | 1783301589770960896 |
---|---|
author | Kiyak, Gorkem Balikci, Tevfik Heydar, Ahmed Majid Bezer, Murat |
author_facet | Kiyak, Gorkem Balikci, Tevfik Heydar, Ahmed Majid Bezer, Murat |
author_sort | Kiyak, Gorkem |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Mechanical study. PURPOSE: To compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Adequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augmentation techniques have been developed to improve the biomechanical characteristics of the bone–screw interface. METHODS: Polyurethane blocks were used to mimic human osteoporotic cancellous bone, and six different screw designs were tested. Five standard and expandable screws without augmentation, eight expandable screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphate augmentation, and distal cannulated screws with PMMA and calcium phosphate augmentation were tested. Mechanical tests were performed on 10 unused new screws of each group. Screws with or without augmentation were inserted in a block that was held in a fixture frame, and a longitudinal extraction force was applied to the screw head at a loading rate of 5 mm/min. Maximum load was recorded in a load displacement curve. RESULTS: The peak pullout force of all tested screws with or without augmentation was significantly greater than that of the standard pedicle screw. The greatest pullout force was observed with 40-mm expandable pedicle screws with four fins and PMMA augmentation. Augmented distal cannulated screws did not have a greater peak pullout force than nonaugmented expandable screws. PMMA augmentation provided a greater peak pullout force than calcium phosphate augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Expandable pedicle screws had greater peak pullout forces than standard pedicle screws and had the advantage of augmentation with either PMMA or calcium phosphate cement. Although calcium phosphate cement is biodegradable, osteoconductive, and nonexothermic, PMMA provided a significantly greater peak pullout force. PMMA-augmented expandable 40-mm four-fin pedicle screws had the greatest peak pullout force. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5821930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58219302018-03-02 Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model Kiyak, Gorkem Balikci, Tevfik Heydar, Ahmed Majid Bezer, Murat Asian Spine J Basic Study STUDY DESIGN: Mechanical study. PURPOSE: To compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Adequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augmentation techniques have been developed to improve the biomechanical characteristics of the bone–screw interface. METHODS: Polyurethane blocks were used to mimic human osteoporotic cancellous bone, and six different screw designs were tested. Five standard and expandable screws without augmentation, eight expandable screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphate augmentation, and distal cannulated screws with PMMA and calcium phosphate augmentation were tested. Mechanical tests were performed on 10 unused new screws of each group. Screws with or without augmentation were inserted in a block that was held in a fixture frame, and a longitudinal extraction force was applied to the screw head at a loading rate of 5 mm/min. Maximum load was recorded in a load displacement curve. RESULTS: The peak pullout force of all tested screws with or without augmentation was significantly greater than that of the standard pedicle screw. The greatest pullout force was observed with 40-mm expandable pedicle screws with four fins and PMMA augmentation. Augmented distal cannulated screws did not have a greater peak pullout force than nonaugmented expandable screws. PMMA augmentation provided a greater peak pullout force than calcium phosphate augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Expandable pedicle screws had greater peak pullout forces than standard pedicle screws and had the advantage of augmentation with either PMMA or calcium phosphate cement. Although calcium phosphate cement is biodegradable, osteoconductive, and nonexothermic, PMMA provided a significantly greater peak pullout force. PMMA-augmented expandable 40-mm four-fin pedicle screws had the greatest peak pullout force. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2018-02 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5821930/ /pubmed/29503676 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.3 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Basic Study Kiyak, Gorkem Balikci, Tevfik Heydar, Ahmed Majid Bezer, Murat Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model |
title | Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model |
title_full | Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model |
title_short | Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model |
title_sort | comparison of the pullout strength of different pedicle screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model |
topic | Basic Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5821930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29503676 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiyakgorkem comparisonofthepulloutstrengthofdifferentpediclescrewdesignsandaugmentationtechniquesinanosteoporoticbonemodel AT balikcitevfik comparisonofthepulloutstrengthofdifferentpediclescrewdesignsandaugmentationtechniquesinanosteoporoticbonemodel AT heydarahmedmajid comparisonofthepulloutstrengthofdifferentpediclescrewdesignsandaugmentationtechniquesinanosteoporoticbonemodel AT bezermurat comparisonofthepulloutstrengthofdifferentpediclescrewdesignsandaugmentationtechniquesinanosteoporoticbonemodel |