Cargando…

The association between community-associated Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Colonization with Staphylococcus aureus is a well-defined risk factor for disease in hospitals, which can range from minor skin infections to severe, systemic diseases. However, the generalizability of this finding has not been thoroughly investigated outside of the hospital environment....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Marina W., Greenfield, Ben K., Snyder, Robert E., Steinmaus, Craig M., Riley, Lee W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-2990-3
_version_ 1783301692207398912
author Kim, Marina W.
Greenfield, Ben K.
Snyder, Robert E.
Steinmaus, Craig M.
Riley, Lee W.
author_facet Kim, Marina W.
Greenfield, Ben K.
Snyder, Robert E.
Steinmaus, Craig M.
Riley, Lee W.
author_sort Kim, Marina W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colonization with Staphylococcus aureus is a well-defined risk factor for disease in hospitals, which can range from minor skin infections to severe, systemic diseases. However, the generalizability of this finding has not been thoroughly investigated outside of the hospital environment. We aimed to assess the role of S. aureus colonization as a risk factor for disease in the community. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies and searched PubMed for articles published between December 1979 and May 23, 2016. We included cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies that reported quantitative estimates of both S. aureus colonization and disease statuses of all study subjects. We excluded studies on recently hospitalized subjects, long-term care facilities, surgery patients, dialysis patients, hospital staff, S. aureus outbreaks, and livestock-associated infections. Our meta-analysis was performed using random-effects analysis to obtain pooled odds ratios (ORs) to compare the odds of S. aureus disease with respect to S. aureus colonization status. RESULTS: We identified 3477 citations, of which 12 articles on 6998 subjects met the eligibility criteria. Overall, subjects colonized with S. aureus were more likely to progress to disease than those who were non-colonized: (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.21–2.88, n = 7 studies). We observed a larger effect with methicillin-resistant S. aureus colonization (7.06, 4.60–10.84, n = 7 studies). However, the methicillin-sensitive S. aureus colonization was not associated with greater odds of disease (1.20, 0.69–2.06, n = 4 studies). Heterogeneity was present across studies in all of the subgroups: S. aureus (I(2) = 95.0%, χ(2) = 120.3, p < 0.001), MRSA (I(2) = 92.8%, χ(2) = 82.8, p = p < 0.001), and MSSA (I(2) = 86.3%, χ(2) = 21.8, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of papers individually support the assumption that colonization is a risk factor for S. aureus disease in the general population, there is marked heterogeneity between studies and further investigation is needed to identify the major sources of this variance. There is a shortage of literature addressing this topic in the community setting and a need for further research on colonization as a focus for disease prevention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-2990-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5822478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58224782018-02-26 The association between community-associated Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis Kim, Marina W. Greenfield, Ben K. Snyder, Robert E. Steinmaus, Craig M. Riley, Lee W. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Colonization with Staphylococcus aureus is a well-defined risk factor for disease in hospitals, which can range from minor skin infections to severe, systemic diseases. However, the generalizability of this finding has not been thoroughly investigated outside of the hospital environment. We aimed to assess the role of S. aureus colonization as a risk factor for disease in the community. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies and searched PubMed for articles published between December 1979 and May 23, 2016. We included cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies that reported quantitative estimates of both S. aureus colonization and disease statuses of all study subjects. We excluded studies on recently hospitalized subjects, long-term care facilities, surgery patients, dialysis patients, hospital staff, S. aureus outbreaks, and livestock-associated infections. Our meta-analysis was performed using random-effects analysis to obtain pooled odds ratios (ORs) to compare the odds of S. aureus disease with respect to S. aureus colonization status. RESULTS: We identified 3477 citations, of which 12 articles on 6998 subjects met the eligibility criteria. Overall, subjects colonized with S. aureus were more likely to progress to disease than those who were non-colonized: (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.21–2.88, n = 7 studies). We observed a larger effect with methicillin-resistant S. aureus colonization (7.06, 4.60–10.84, n = 7 studies). However, the methicillin-sensitive S. aureus colonization was not associated with greater odds of disease (1.20, 0.69–2.06, n = 4 studies). Heterogeneity was present across studies in all of the subgroups: S. aureus (I(2) = 95.0%, χ(2) = 120.3, p < 0.001), MRSA (I(2) = 92.8%, χ(2) = 82.8, p = p < 0.001), and MSSA (I(2) = 86.3%, χ(2) = 21.8, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of papers individually support the assumption that colonization is a risk factor for S. aureus disease in the general population, there is marked heterogeneity between studies and further investigation is needed to identify the major sources of this variance. There is a shortage of literature addressing this topic in the community setting and a need for further research on colonization as a focus for disease prevention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-2990-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5822478/ /pubmed/29466953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-2990-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Marina W.
Greenfield, Ben K.
Snyder, Robert E.
Steinmaus, Craig M.
Riley, Lee W.
The association between community-associated Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis
title The association between community-associated Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis
title_full The association between community-associated Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The association between community-associated Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The association between community-associated Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis
title_short The association between community-associated Staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis
title_sort association between community-associated staphylococcus aureus colonization and disease: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-2990-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmarinaw theassociationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT greenfieldbenk theassociationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT snyderroberte theassociationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT steinmauscraigm theassociationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT rileyleew theassociationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT kimmarinaw associationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT greenfieldbenk associationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT snyderroberte associationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT steinmauscraigm associationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis
AT rileyleew associationbetweencommunityassociatedstaphylococcusaureuscolonizationanddiseaseametaanalysis