Cargando…
Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The benefits of trauma registries have been well described. The crucial data they provide may guide injury prevention strategies, inform resource allocation, and support advocacy and policy. This has been shown to reduce trauma-related mortality in various settings. Trauma remains a lead...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0700-2 |
_version_ | 1783301702748733440 |
---|---|
author | Paradis, Tiffany St-Louis, Etienne Landry, Tara Poenaru, Dan |
author_facet | Paradis, Tiffany St-Louis, Etienne Landry, Tara Poenaru, Dan |
author_sort | Paradis, Tiffany |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The benefits of trauma registries have been well described. The crucial data they provide may guide injury prevention strategies, inform resource allocation, and support advocacy and policy. This has been shown to reduce trauma-related mortality in various settings. Trauma remains a leading cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the implementation of trauma registries in LMICs can be challenging due to lack of funding, specialized personnel, and infrastructure. This study explores strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in LMICs. METHODS: The protocol was registered a priori (CRD42017058586). A peer-reviewed search strategy of multiple databases will be developed with a senior librarian. As per PRISMA guidelines, first screen of references based on abstract and title and subsequent full-text review will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Disagreements that cannot be resolved by discussion between reviewers shall be arbitrated by the principal investigator. Data extraction will be performed using a pre-defined data extraction sheet. Finally, bibliographies of included articles will be hand-searched. Studies of any design will be included if they describe or review development and implementation of a trauma registry in LMICs. No language or period restrictions will be applied. Summary statistics and qualitative meta-narrative analyses will be performed. DISCUSSION: The significant burden of trauma in LMIC environments presents unique challenges and limitations. Adapted strategies for deployment and maintenance of sustainable trauma registries are needed. Our methodology will systematically identify recommendations and strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in LMICs and describe threats and barriers to this endeavor. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42017058586). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0700-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5822522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58225222018-02-26 Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review Paradis, Tiffany St-Louis, Etienne Landry, Tara Poenaru, Dan Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The benefits of trauma registries have been well described. The crucial data they provide may guide injury prevention strategies, inform resource allocation, and support advocacy and policy. This has been shown to reduce trauma-related mortality in various settings. Trauma remains a leading cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the implementation of trauma registries in LMICs can be challenging due to lack of funding, specialized personnel, and infrastructure. This study explores strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in LMICs. METHODS: The protocol was registered a priori (CRD42017058586). A peer-reviewed search strategy of multiple databases will be developed with a senior librarian. As per PRISMA guidelines, first screen of references based on abstract and title and subsequent full-text review will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Disagreements that cannot be resolved by discussion between reviewers shall be arbitrated by the principal investigator. Data extraction will be performed using a pre-defined data extraction sheet. Finally, bibliographies of included articles will be hand-searched. Studies of any design will be included if they describe or review development and implementation of a trauma registry in LMICs. No language or period restrictions will be applied. Summary statistics and qualitative meta-narrative analyses will be performed. DISCUSSION: The significant burden of trauma in LMIC environments presents unique challenges and limitations. Adapted strategies for deployment and maintenance of sustainable trauma registries are needed. Our methodology will systematically identify recommendations and strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in LMICs and describe threats and barriers to this endeavor. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42017058586). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0700-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5822522/ /pubmed/29467037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0700-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Paradis, Tiffany St-Louis, Etienne Landry, Tara Poenaru, Dan Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review |
title | Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries—protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0700-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paradistiffany strategiesforsuccessfultraumaregistryimplementationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesprotocolforasystematicreview AT stlouisetienne strategiesforsuccessfultraumaregistryimplementationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesprotocolforasystematicreview AT landrytara strategiesforsuccessfultraumaregistryimplementationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesprotocolforasystematicreview AT poenarudan strategiesforsuccessfultraumaregistryimplementationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesprotocolforasystematicreview |