Cargando…

Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Recently, bone graft materials using permanent teeth have come to light, and clinical and histological outcomes of this material have been confirmed by some studies. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the reliability of the autogenous tooth bone graft material applied to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gual-Vaqués, Patricia, Polis-Yanes, Carlos, Estrugo-Devesa, Albert, Ayuso-Montero, Raúl, Marí-Roig, Antoni, López-López, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274156
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22197
_version_ 1783301705394290688
author Gual-Vaqués, Patricia
Polis-Yanes, Carlos
Estrugo-Devesa, Albert
Ayuso-Montero, Raúl
Marí-Roig, Antoni
López-López, José
author_facet Gual-Vaqués, Patricia
Polis-Yanes, Carlos
Estrugo-Devesa, Albert
Ayuso-Montero, Raúl
Marí-Roig, Antoni
López-López, José
author_sort Gual-Vaqués, Patricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, bone graft materials using permanent teeth have come to light, and clinical and histological outcomes of this material have been confirmed by some studies. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the reliability of the autogenous tooth bone graft material applied to alveolar ridge augmentation procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of literature was conducted analyzing articles published between 2007 and 2017. The following four outcome variables were defined: a) implant stability b) post-operative complication c) evaluation of implant survival and failure rates, and d) histological analysis. A total of 108 articles were identified; 6 were selected for review. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with alveolar ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the autogenous teeth used as bone graft? RESULTS: The mean primary stability of the placed implants was 67.3 ISQ and the mean secondary stability was 75.5 ISQ. The dehiscence of the wound was the most frequent complication with a rate of 29.1%. Of the 182 analyzed implants, the survival rate was 97.7% and the failure rate was 2.3%. In the histological analysis, most of studies reported bone formation. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence regarding the effects of autogenous teeth used for bone grafting to support any definitive conclusions, although it has been shown clinically safe and good bone forming capacity, and good results are shown about implant stability. Key words:Bone regeneration, bone graft material, autogenous teeth graft, tooth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5822533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58225332018-02-26 Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review Gual-Vaqués, Patricia Polis-Yanes, Carlos Estrugo-Devesa, Albert Ayuso-Montero, Raúl Marí-Roig, Antoni López-López, José Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Recently, bone graft materials using permanent teeth have come to light, and clinical and histological outcomes of this material have been confirmed by some studies. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the reliability of the autogenous tooth bone graft material applied to alveolar ridge augmentation procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of literature was conducted analyzing articles published between 2007 and 2017. The following four outcome variables were defined: a) implant stability b) post-operative complication c) evaluation of implant survival and failure rates, and d) histological analysis. A total of 108 articles were identified; 6 were selected for review. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with alveolar ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the autogenous teeth used as bone graft? RESULTS: The mean primary stability of the placed implants was 67.3 ISQ and the mean secondary stability was 75.5 ISQ. The dehiscence of the wound was the most frequent complication with a rate of 29.1%. Of the 182 analyzed implants, the survival rate was 97.7% and the failure rate was 2.3%. In the histological analysis, most of studies reported bone formation. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence regarding the effects of autogenous teeth used for bone grafting to support any definitive conclusions, although it has been shown clinically safe and good bone forming capacity, and good results are shown about implant stability. Key words:Bone regeneration, bone graft material, autogenous teeth graft, tooth. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-01 2017-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5822533/ /pubmed/29274156 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22197 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Gual-Vaqués, Patricia
Polis-Yanes, Carlos
Estrugo-Devesa, Albert
Ayuso-Montero, Raúl
Marí-Roig, Antoni
López-López, José
Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review
title Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review
title_full Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review
title_fullStr Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review
title_short Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review
title_sort autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274156
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22197
work_keys_str_mv AT gualvaquespatricia autogenousteethusedforbonegraftingasystematicreview
AT polisyanescarlos autogenousteethusedforbonegraftingasystematicreview
AT estrugodevesaalbert autogenousteethusedforbonegraftingasystematicreview
AT ayusomonteroraul autogenousteethusedforbonegraftingasystematicreview
AT mariroigantoni autogenousteethusedforbonegraftingasystematicreview
AT lopezlopezjose autogenousteethusedforbonegraftingasystematicreview