Cargando…

Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term adherence and patients’ experiences

BACKGROUND: Despite the advances in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with mandibular advancement appliances (MAA), their effectiveness is dependent on the patients’ compliance. Our aims were to evaluate the long-term adherence to MAA therapy and patients’ experiences of the treatment i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saglam-Aydinatay, Banu, Taner, Tülin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274155
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22158
_version_ 1783301708014682112
author Saglam-Aydinatay, Banu
Taner, Tülin
author_facet Saglam-Aydinatay, Banu
Taner, Tülin
author_sort Saglam-Aydinatay, Banu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the advances in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with mandibular advancement appliances (MAA), their effectiveness is dependent on the patients’ compliance. Our aims were to evaluate the long-term adherence to MAA therapy and patients’ experiences of the treatment in OSA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients (52 males, 17 females; Mean age: 54.4±10.8 years) were included in the study. The subjects were mild (56%) and moderate (44%) OSA patients who had been treated using MAA at least 4 years prior to the study. A phone survey was used to determine the demographic characteristics of the patients, as well as to assess self-reported adherence to therapy, subjective long-term effectiveness, and patient experiences with the appliance. Descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square test, and independent samples t-test were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Only 22 (32%) patients reported using the appliance regularly. Most of the non-adherent patients had stopped using their appliances in the first year (55%). The mean duration of appliance use was 33.5 months (Median: 12 months). No significant differences in appliance type, OSA severity, educational level, gender, marital status, income status, employment status or place of residence existed between adherent and non-adherent subjects. Adherent subjects were significantly younger than non-adherent subjects (Age: 50.6 ± 11.9 versus 56.1 ± 9.9, p<0.05). The most common reasons reported by patients were inability to adapt to the appliance (62%) and pain in the temporomandibular joint (38%). The most common factors associated with continued usage were effectiveness (100%) and ease of use (64%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall long-term nonadherence to MAA therapy in mild-to moderate OSA patients was high suggesting that barriers to MAA therapy adherence should be prevented to increase the efficiency of oral appliance treatment in OSA and achieve better outcomes for this disease. Key words:Obstructive sleep apnea, mandibular advancement, therapy, oral appliance, long-term compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5822544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58225442018-02-26 Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term adherence and patients’ experiences Saglam-Aydinatay, Banu Taner, Tülin Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: Despite the advances in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with mandibular advancement appliances (MAA), their effectiveness is dependent on the patients’ compliance. Our aims were to evaluate the long-term adherence to MAA therapy and patients’ experiences of the treatment in OSA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients (52 males, 17 females; Mean age: 54.4±10.8 years) were included in the study. The subjects were mild (56%) and moderate (44%) OSA patients who had been treated using MAA at least 4 years prior to the study. A phone survey was used to determine the demographic characteristics of the patients, as well as to assess self-reported adherence to therapy, subjective long-term effectiveness, and patient experiences with the appliance. Descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square test, and independent samples t-test were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Only 22 (32%) patients reported using the appliance regularly. Most of the non-adherent patients had stopped using their appliances in the first year (55%). The mean duration of appliance use was 33.5 months (Median: 12 months). No significant differences in appliance type, OSA severity, educational level, gender, marital status, income status, employment status or place of residence existed between adherent and non-adherent subjects. Adherent subjects were significantly younger than non-adherent subjects (Age: 50.6 ± 11.9 versus 56.1 ± 9.9, p<0.05). The most common reasons reported by patients were inability to adapt to the appliance (62%) and pain in the temporomandibular joint (38%). The most common factors associated with continued usage were effectiveness (100%) and ease of use (64%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall long-term nonadherence to MAA therapy in mild-to moderate OSA patients was high suggesting that barriers to MAA therapy adherence should be prevented to increase the efficiency of oral appliance treatment in OSA and achieve better outcomes for this disease. Key words:Obstructive sleep apnea, mandibular advancement, therapy, oral appliance, long-term compliance. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-01 2017-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5822544/ /pubmed/29274155 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22158 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Saglam-Aydinatay, Banu
Taner, Tülin
Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term adherence and patients’ experiences
title Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term adherence and patients’ experiences
title_full Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term adherence and patients’ experiences
title_fullStr Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term adherence and patients’ experiences
title_full_unstemmed Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term adherence and patients’ experiences
title_short Oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term adherence and patients’ experiences
title_sort oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: long-term adherence and patients’ experiences
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274155
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22158
work_keys_str_mv AT saglamaydinataybanu oralappliancetherapyinobstructivesleepapnealongtermadherenceandpatientsexperiences
AT tanertulin oralappliancetherapyinobstructivesleepapnealongtermadherenceandpatientsexperiences