Cargando…

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a growing concern in meeting global targets for TB control. In high-income low-TB-incidence countries, a disproportionate number of MDR-TB cases occur in migrant (foreign-born) populations, with concerns about low adherence rates in these pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nellums, Laura B., Rustage, Kieran, Hargreaves, Sally, Friedland, Jon S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-1001-7
_version_ 1783301723531509760
author Nellums, Laura B.
Rustage, Kieran
Hargreaves, Sally
Friedland, Jon S.
author_facet Nellums, Laura B.
Rustage, Kieran
Hargreaves, Sally
Friedland, Jon S.
author_sort Nellums, Laura B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a growing concern in meeting global targets for TB control. In high-income low-TB-incidence countries, a disproportionate number of MDR-TB cases occur in migrant (foreign-born) populations, with concerns about low adherence rates in these patients compared to the host non-migrant population. Tackling MDR-TB in this context may, therefore, require unique approaches. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and synthesise data on MDR-TB treatment adherence in migrant patients to inform evidence-based strategies to improve care pathways and health outcomes in this group. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO 42017070756). The databases Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health and PubMed were searched to 24 May 2017 for primary research reporting MDR-TB treatment adherence and outcomes in migrant populations, with no restrictions on dates or language. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. RESULTS: From 413 papers identified in the database search, 15 studies reporting on MDR-TB treatment outcomes for 258 migrants and 174 non-migrants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The estimated rate of adherence to MDR-TB treatment across migrant patients was 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 58–84%], with non-adherence reported among 20% (95% CI = 4–37%) of migrant patients. A key finding was that there were no differences in estimated rates of adherence [risk ratio (RR) = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.82–1.34] or non-adherence (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.79–1.36) between migrants and non-migrants. CONCLUSIONS: MDR-TB treatment adherence rates among migrants in high-income low-TB-incidence countries are approaching global targets for treatment success (75%), and are comparable to rates in non-migrants. The findings highlight that only just over 70% of migrant and non-migrant patients adhere to MDR-TB treatment. The results point to the importance of increasing adherence in all patient groups, including migrants, with an emphasis on tailoring care based on social risk factors for poor adherence. We believe that MDR-TB treatment targets are not ambitious enough.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5822608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58226082018-02-26 Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nellums, Laura B. Rustage, Kieran Hargreaves, Sally Friedland, Jon S. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a growing concern in meeting global targets for TB control. In high-income low-TB-incidence countries, a disproportionate number of MDR-TB cases occur in migrant (foreign-born) populations, with concerns about low adherence rates in these patients compared to the host non-migrant population. Tackling MDR-TB in this context may, therefore, require unique approaches. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and synthesise data on MDR-TB treatment adherence in migrant patients to inform evidence-based strategies to improve care pathways and health outcomes in this group. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO 42017070756). The databases Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health and PubMed were searched to 24 May 2017 for primary research reporting MDR-TB treatment adherence and outcomes in migrant populations, with no restrictions on dates or language. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. RESULTS: From 413 papers identified in the database search, 15 studies reporting on MDR-TB treatment outcomes for 258 migrants and 174 non-migrants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The estimated rate of adherence to MDR-TB treatment across migrant patients was 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 58–84%], with non-adherence reported among 20% (95% CI = 4–37%) of migrant patients. A key finding was that there were no differences in estimated rates of adherence [risk ratio (RR) = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.82–1.34] or non-adherence (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.79–1.36) between migrants and non-migrants. CONCLUSIONS: MDR-TB treatment adherence rates among migrants in high-income low-TB-incidence countries are approaching global targets for treatment success (75%), and are comparable to rates in non-migrants. The findings highlight that only just over 70% of migrant and non-migrant patients adhere to MDR-TB treatment. The results point to the importance of increasing adherence in all patient groups, including migrants, with an emphasis on tailoring care based on social risk factors for poor adherence. We believe that MDR-TB treatment targets are not ambitious enough. BioMed Central 2018-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5822608/ /pubmed/29466983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-1001-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nellums, Laura B.
Rustage, Kieran
Hargreaves, Sally
Friedland, Jon S.
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-1001-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nellumslaurab multidrugresistanttuberculosistreatmentadherenceinmigrantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rustagekieran multidrugresistanttuberculosistreatmentadherenceinmigrantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hargreavessally multidrugresistanttuberculosistreatmentadherenceinmigrantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT friedlandjons multidrugresistanttuberculosistreatmentadherenceinmigrantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis