Cargando…

Penile Rehabilitation and Neuromodulation

Erectile dysfunction (ED) following treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer, particularly radical prostatectomy (RP), is a major quality of life issue that remains unsatisfactorily addressed. With the introduction and use of cavernous nerve–sparing procedures over the past 25 years, many...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Facio, Fernando, Burnett, Arthur L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19649504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.86
_version_ 1783301816470994944
author Facio, Fernando
Burnett, Arthur L.
author_facet Facio, Fernando
Burnett, Arthur L.
author_sort Facio, Fernando
collection PubMed
description Erectile dysfunction (ED) following treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer, particularly radical prostatectomy (RP), is a major quality of life issue that remains unsatisfactorily addressed. With the introduction and use of cavernous nerve–sparing procedures over the past 25 years, many men recover erections postoperatively that enable sexual intercourse unlike in the prior surgical era, when permanent ED postoperatively was certain. Despite this advance, 26–100% of these patients may never recover normal erectile function (EF). Recent advances in the understanding of ED after RP have stimulated great attention to develop penile rehabilitation programs and neuromodulation. The purpose of penile rehabilitation is to prevent adverse corpus cavernosal tissue structural alterations and thereby maximize the chances of recovering functional erections. Rehabilitation programs are common in clinical practice, but there is no definitive evidence to support their efficacy. Neuromodulation represents another strategy for promoting erection recovery postoperatively. This therapy involves the application of neuroprotective interventions, conceivably targeting biological elements involved in the erection response that are affected by neuropathic injury. Well-conducted, controlled trials with adequate follow-up are required in order to determine the erection preservative benefits of these therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this essay is to describe the mechanisms related to post-RP ED, assess the need for penile rehabilitation and neuromodulation following surgery, and analyze the basic science and clinical trial evidence associated with these applications for preserving EF following prostate cancer treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5823107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58231072018-03-14 Penile Rehabilitation and Neuromodulation Facio, Fernando Burnett, Arthur L. ScientificWorldJournal Review Article Erectile dysfunction (ED) following treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer, particularly radical prostatectomy (RP), is a major quality of life issue that remains unsatisfactorily addressed. With the introduction and use of cavernous nerve–sparing procedures over the past 25 years, many men recover erections postoperatively that enable sexual intercourse unlike in the prior surgical era, when permanent ED postoperatively was certain. Despite this advance, 26–100% of these patients may never recover normal erectile function (EF). Recent advances in the understanding of ED after RP have stimulated great attention to develop penile rehabilitation programs and neuromodulation. The purpose of penile rehabilitation is to prevent adverse corpus cavernosal tissue structural alterations and thereby maximize the chances of recovering functional erections. Rehabilitation programs are common in clinical practice, but there is no definitive evidence to support their efficacy. Neuromodulation represents another strategy for promoting erection recovery postoperatively. This therapy involves the application of neuroprotective interventions, conceivably targeting biological elements involved in the erection response that are affected by neuropathic injury. Well-conducted, controlled trials with adequate follow-up are required in order to determine the erection preservative benefits of these therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this essay is to describe the mechanisms related to post-RP ED, assess the need for penile rehabilitation and neuromodulation following surgery, and analyze the basic science and clinical trial evidence associated with these applications for preserving EF following prostate cancer treatment. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2009-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5823107/ /pubmed/19649504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.86 Text en Copyright © 2009 Fernando Facio and Arthur L Burnett. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Facio, Fernando
Burnett, Arthur L.
Penile Rehabilitation and Neuromodulation
title Penile Rehabilitation and Neuromodulation
title_full Penile Rehabilitation and Neuromodulation
title_fullStr Penile Rehabilitation and Neuromodulation
title_full_unstemmed Penile Rehabilitation and Neuromodulation
title_short Penile Rehabilitation and Neuromodulation
title_sort penile rehabilitation and neuromodulation
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19649504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.86
work_keys_str_mv AT faciofernando penilerehabilitationandneuromodulation
AT burnettarthurl penilerehabilitationandneuromodulation