Cargando…

Vaginal Mesh Kits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Friend or Foe: A Comprehensive Review

Graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery has become more common secondary to high failure rates seen with traditional repairs. Mesh has been shown to be successful when suspending the upper portion of the vagina with sacralcolpopexy and its use vaginally is in an attempt to reproduce those results seen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Robert D., Miklos, John R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19252757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.19
_version_ 1783301843339706368
author Moore, Robert D.
Miklos, John R.
author_facet Moore, Robert D.
Miklos, John R.
author_sort Moore, Robert D.
collection PubMed
description Graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery has become more common secondary to high failure rates seen with traditional repairs. Mesh has been shown to be successful when suspending the upper portion of the vagina with sacralcolpopexy and its use vaginally is in an attempt to reproduce those results seen from the more invasive abdominal approach. A recent Cochrane review has supported its use in the anterior compartment vaginally as lower failure rates have been shown. Vaginal mesh “kits” have been developed in an attempt to make these surgeries less invasive, more standardized, and easier to perform. One of the problems that does seem to be emerging is the thought that, just because these procedures are now being produced in “kits”, they can be completed by any surgeon. This may not hold true, as these are still advanced techniques that require advanced pelvic surgery skills and, therefore, it is up to surgeons to also understand this and the limitations of these procedures. The current paper reviews the history of the development of mesh kits, the techniques utilized, and the data that have been published to date on results and complications, and recommendations on how to avoid these complications. Although initial studies are encouraging, more will need to be completed prior to the recommendations of general use of these kits in all prolapse patients. We need to have further investigation on proper patient selection, we must continue research on graft composition, and we must continue to develop techniques to minimize complications of needle passage or mesh placement. Even after we gain this knowledge, it will still require advanced surgical skills to complete these types of surgeries, and to help minimize complications and maximize results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5823225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58232252018-03-14 Vaginal Mesh Kits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Friend or Foe: A Comprehensive Review Moore, Robert D. Miklos, John R. ScientificWorldJournal Review Article Graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery has become more common secondary to high failure rates seen with traditional repairs. Mesh has been shown to be successful when suspending the upper portion of the vagina with sacralcolpopexy and its use vaginally is in an attempt to reproduce those results seen from the more invasive abdominal approach. A recent Cochrane review has supported its use in the anterior compartment vaginally as lower failure rates have been shown. Vaginal mesh “kits” have been developed in an attempt to make these surgeries less invasive, more standardized, and easier to perform. One of the problems that does seem to be emerging is the thought that, just because these procedures are now being produced in “kits”, they can be completed by any surgeon. This may not hold true, as these are still advanced techniques that require advanced pelvic surgery skills and, therefore, it is up to surgeons to also understand this and the limitations of these procedures. The current paper reviews the history of the development of mesh kits, the techniques utilized, and the data that have been published to date on results and complications, and recommendations on how to avoid these complications. Although initial studies are encouraging, more will need to be completed prior to the recommendations of general use of these kits in all prolapse patients. We need to have further investigation on proper patient selection, we must continue research on graft composition, and we must continue to develop techniques to minimize complications of needle passage or mesh placement. Even after we gain this knowledge, it will still require advanced surgical skills to complete these types of surgeries, and to help minimize complications and maximize results. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2009-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5823225/ /pubmed/19252757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.19 Text en Copyright © 2009 Robert D. Moore and John R. Miklos. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Moore, Robert D.
Miklos, John R.
Vaginal Mesh Kits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Friend or Foe: A Comprehensive Review
title Vaginal Mesh Kits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Friend or Foe: A Comprehensive Review
title_full Vaginal Mesh Kits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Friend or Foe: A Comprehensive Review
title_fullStr Vaginal Mesh Kits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Friend or Foe: A Comprehensive Review
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal Mesh Kits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Friend or Foe: A Comprehensive Review
title_short Vaginal Mesh Kits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Friend or Foe: A Comprehensive Review
title_sort vaginal mesh kits for pelvic organ prolapse, friend or foe: a comprehensive review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19252757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.19
work_keys_str_mv AT moorerobertd vaginalmeshkitsforpelvicorganprolapsefriendorfoeacomprehensivereview
AT miklosjohnr vaginalmeshkitsforpelvicorganprolapsefriendorfoeacomprehensivereview