Cargando…

Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services

BACKGROUND: With the availability of raw DNA generated from direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) testing companies, there has been a proliferation of third‐party online services that are available to interpret the raw data for both genealogy and/or health purposes. This study examines the current landscape and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Catharine, Cahill, Tiernan J., Parlato, Andrew, Wertz, Blake, Zhong, Qiankun, Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas, Cummings, James J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.340
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: With the availability of raw DNA generated from direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) testing companies, there has been a proliferation of third‐party online services that are available to interpret the raw data for both genealogy and/or health purposes. This study examines the current landscape and downstream clinical implications of consumer use of third‐party services. METHODS: Study participants were recruited online from social media platforms. A total of 321 survey respondents reported using third‐party services for raw DNA interpretation. RESULTS: Participants were highly motivated to explore raw DNA for ancestral information (67%), individual health implications (62%), or both (40%). Participants primarily used one of seven companies to interpret raw DNA; 73% used more than one. Company choice was driven by the type of results offered (51%), price (45%), and online reviews (31%). Approximately 30% of participants shared results with a medical provider and 21% shared with more than one. Outcomes of sharing ranged from disinterest/discounting of the information to diagnosis of genetic conditions. Participants were highly satisfied with their decision to analyze raw DNA (M = 4.54/5), yet challenges in understanding interpretation results were reported irrespective of satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSION: Consumers face challenges in understanding the results and may seek out clinical assistance in interpreting their raw DNA results.