Cargando…

Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services

BACKGROUND: With the availability of raw DNA generated from direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) testing companies, there has been a proliferation of third‐party online services that are available to interpret the raw data for both genealogy and/or health purposes. This study examines the current landscape and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Catharine, Cahill, Tiernan J., Parlato, Andrew, Wertz, Blake, Zhong, Qiankun, Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas, Cummings, James J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.340
_version_ 1783301924189110272
author Wang, Catharine
Cahill, Tiernan J.
Parlato, Andrew
Wertz, Blake
Zhong, Qiankun
Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas
Cummings, James J.
author_facet Wang, Catharine
Cahill, Tiernan J.
Parlato, Andrew
Wertz, Blake
Zhong, Qiankun
Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas
Cummings, James J.
author_sort Wang, Catharine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the availability of raw DNA generated from direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) testing companies, there has been a proliferation of third‐party online services that are available to interpret the raw data for both genealogy and/or health purposes. This study examines the current landscape and downstream clinical implications of consumer use of third‐party services. METHODS: Study participants were recruited online from social media platforms. A total of 321 survey respondents reported using third‐party services for raw DNA interpretation. RESULTS: Participants were highly motivated to explore raw DNA for ancestral information (67%), individual health implications (62%), or both (40%). Participants primarily used one of seven companies to interpret raw DNA; 73% used more than one. Company choice was driven by the type of results offered (51%), price (45%), and online reviews (31%). Approximately 30% of participants shared results with a medical provider and 21% shared with more than one. Outcomes of sharing ranged from disinterest/discounting of the information to diagnosis of genetic conditions. Participants were highly satisfied with their decision to analyze raw DNA (M = 4.54/5), yet challenges in understanding interpretation results were reported irrespective of satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSION: Consumers face challenges in understanding the results and may seek out clinical assistance in interpreting their raw DNA results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5823680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58236802018-02-28 Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services Wang, Catharine Cahill, Tiernan J. Parlato, Andrew Wertz, Blake Zhong, Qiankun Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas Cummings, James J. Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: With the availability of raw DNA generated from direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) testing companies, there has been a proliferation of third‐party online services that are available to interpret the raw data for both genealogy and/or health purposes. This study examines the current landscape and downstream clinical implications of consumer use of third‐party services. METHODS: Study participants were recruited online from social media platforms. A total of 321 survey respondents reported using third‐party services for raw DNA interpretation. RESULTS: Participants were highly motivated to explore raw DNA for ancestral information (67%), individual health implications (62%), or both (40%). Participants primarily used one of seven companies to interpret raw DNA; 73% used more than one. Company choice was driven by the type of results offered (51%), price (45%), and online reviews (31%). Approximately 30% of participants shared results with a medical provider and 21% shared with more than one. Outcomes of sharing ranged from disinterest/discounting of the information to diagnosis of genetic conditions. Participants were highly satisfied with their decision to analyze raw DNA (M = 4.54/5), yet challenges in understanding interpretation results were reported irrespective of satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSION: Consumers face challenges in understanding the results and may seek out clinical assistance in interpreting their raw DNA results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5823680/ /pubmed/29471590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.340 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wang, Catharine
Cahill, Tiernan J.
Parlato, Andrew
Wertz, Blake
Zhong, Qiankun
Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas
Cummings, James J.
Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services
title Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services
title_full Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services
title_fullStr Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services
title_full_unstemmed Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services
title_short Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services
title_sort consumer use and response to online third‐party raw dna interpretation services
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.340
work_keys_str_mv AT wangcatharine consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices
AT cahilltiernanj consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices
AT parlatoandrew consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices
AT wertzblake consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices
AT zhongqiankun consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices
AT cunninghamtricianorkunas consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices
AT cummingsjamesj consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices