Cargando…
Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services
BACKGROUND: With the availability of raw DNA generated from direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) testing companies, there has been a proliferation of third‐party online services that are available to interpret the raw data for both genealogy and/or health purposes. This study examines the current landscape and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.340 |
_version_ | 1783301924189110272 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Catharine Cahill, Tiernan J. Parlato, Andrew Wertz, Blake Zhong, Qiankun Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas Cummings, James J. |
author_facet | Wang, Catharine Cahill, Tiernan J. Parlato, Andrew Wertz, Blake Zhong, Qiankun Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas Cummings, James J. |
author_sort | Wang, Catharine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the availability of raw DNA generated from direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) testing companies, there has been a proliferation of third‐party online services that are available to interpret the raw data for both genealogy and/or health purposes. This study examines the current landscape and downstream clinical implications of consumer use of third‐party services. METHODS: Study participants were recruited online from social media platforms. A total of 321 survey respondents reported using third‐party services for raw DNA interpretation. RESULTS: Participants were highly motivated to explore raw DNA for ancestral information (67%), individual health implications (62%), or both (40%). Participants primarily used one of seven companies to interpret raw DNA; 73% used more than one. Company choice was driven by the type of results offered (51%), price (45%), and online reviews (31%). Approximately 30% of participants shared results with a medical provider and 21% shared with more than one. Outcomes of sharing ranged from disinterest/discounting of the information to diagnosis of genetic conditions. Participants were highly satisfied with their decision to analyze raw DNA (M = 4.54/5), yet challenges in understanding interpretation results were reported irrespective of satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSION: Consumers face challenges in understanding the results and may seek out clinical assistance in interpreting their raw DNA results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5823680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58236802018-02-28 Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services Wang, Catharine Cahill, Tiernan J. Parlato, Andrew Wertz, Blake Zhong, Qiankun Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas Cummings, James J. Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: With the availability of raw DNA generated from direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) testing companies, there has been a proliferation of third‐party online services that are available to interpret the raw data for both genealogy and/or health purposes. This study examines the current landscape and downstream clinical implications of consumer use of third‐party services. METHODS: Study participants were recruited online from social media platforms. A total of 321 survey respondents reported using third‐party services for raw DNA interpretation. RESULTS: Participants were highly motivated to explore raw DNA for ancestral information (67%), individual health implications (62%), or both (40%). Participants primarily used one of seven companies to interpret raw DNA; 73% used more than one. Company choice was driven by the type of results offered (51%), price (45%), and online reviews (31%). Approximately 30% of participants shared results with a medical provider and 21% shared with more than one. Outcomes of sharing ranged from disinterest/discounting of the information to diagnosis of genetic conditions. Participants were highly satisfied with their decision to analyze raw DNA (M = 4.54/5), yet challenges in understanding interpretation results were reported irrespective of satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSION: Consumers face challenges in understanding the results and may seek out clinical assistance in interpreting their raw DNA results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5823680/ /pubmed/29471590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.340 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wang, Catharine Cahill, Tiernan J. Parlato, Andrew Wertz, Blake Zhong, Qiankun Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas Cummings, James J. Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services |
title | Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services |
title_full | Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services |
title_fullStr | Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services |
title_full_unstemmed | Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services |
title_short | Consumer use and response to online third‐party raw DNA interpretation services |
title_sort | consumer use and response to online third‐party raw dna interpretation services |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangcatharine consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices AT cahilltiernanj consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices AT parlatoandrew consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices AT wertzblake consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices AT zhongqiankun consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices AT cunninghamtricianorkunas consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices AT cummingsjamesj consumeruseandresponsetoonlinethirdpartyrawdnainterpretationservices |