Cargando…
Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review
Wounds are of a variety of types and each category has its own distinctive healing requirements. This realization has spurred the development of a myriad of wound dressings, each with specific characteristics. It is unrealistic to expect a singular dressing to embrace all characteristics that would...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29446015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0083-4 |
_version_ | 1783301930531946496 |
---|---|
author | Mir, Mariam Ali, Murtaza Najabat Barakullah, Afifa Gulzar, Ayesha Arshad, Munam Fatima, Shizza Asad, Maliha |
author_facet | Mir, Mariam Ali, Murtaza Najabat Barakullah, Afifa Gulzar, Ayesha Arshad, Munam Fatima, Shizza Asad, Maliha |
author_sort | Mir, Mariam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wounds are of a variety of types and each category has its own distinctive healing requirements. This realization has spurred the development of a myriad of wound dressings, each with specific characteristics. It is unrealistic to expect a singular dressing to embrace all characteristics that would fulfill generic needs for wound healing. However, each dressing may approach the ideal requirements by deviating from the ‘one size fits all approach’, if it conforms strictly to the specifications of the wound and the patient. Indeed, a functional wound dressing should achieve healing of the wound with minimal time and cost expenditures. This article offers an insight into several different types of polymeric materials clinically used in wound dressings and the events taking place at cellular level, which aid the process of healing, while the biomaterial dressing interacts with the body tissue. Hence, the significance of using synthetic polymer films, foam dressings, hydrocolloids, alginate dressings, and hydrogels has been reviewed, and the properties of these materials that conform to wound-healing requirements have been explored. A special section on bioactive dressings and bioengineered skin substitutes that play an active part in healing process has been re-examined in this work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5823812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58238122018-02-28 Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review Mir, Mariam Ali, Murtaza Najabat Barakullah, Afifa Gulzar, Ayesha Arshad, Munam Fatima, Shizza Asad, Maliha Prog Biomater Review Paper Wounds are of a variety of types and each category has its own distinctive healing requirements. This realization has spurred the development of a myriad of wound dressings, each with specific characteristics. It is unrealistic to expect a singular dressing to embrace all characteristics that would fulfill generic needs for wound healing. However, each dressing may approach the ideal requirements by deviating from the ‘one size fits all approach’, if it conforms strictly to the specifications of the wound and the patient. Indeed, a functional wound dressing should achieve healing of the wound with minimal time and cost expenditures. This article offers an insight into several different types of polymeric materials clinically used in wound dressings and the events taking place at cellular level, which aid the process of healing, while the biomaterial dressing interacts with the body tissue. Hence, the significance of using synthetic polymer films, foam dressings, hydrocolloids, alginate dressings, and hydrogels has been reviewed, and the properties of these materials that conform to wound-healing requirements have been explored. A special section on bioactive dressings and bioengineered skin substitutes that play an active part in healing process has been re-examined in this work. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5823812/ /pubmed/29446015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0083-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Mir, Mariam Ali, Murtaza Najabat Barakullah, Afifa Gulzar, Ayesha Arshad, Munam Fatima, Shizza Asad, Maliha Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review |
title | Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review |
title_full | Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review |
title_fullStr | Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review |
title_short | Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review |
title_sort | synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29446015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0083-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mirmariam syntheticpolymericbiomaterialsforwoundhealingareview AT alimurtazanajabat syntheticpolymericbiomaterialsforwoundhealingareview AT barakullahafifa syntheticpolymericbiomaterialsforwoundhealingareview AT gulzarayesha syntheticpolymericbiomaterialsforwoundhealingareview AT arshadmunam syntheticpolymericbiomaterialsforwoundhealingareview AT fatimashizza syntheticpolymericbiomaterialsforwoundhealingareview AT asadmaliha syntheticpolymericbiomaterialsforwoundhealingareview |