Cargando…
Input–output maps are strongly biased towards simple outputs
Many systems in nature can be described using discrete input–output maps. Without knowing details about a map, there may seem to be no a priori reason to expect that a randomly chosen input would be more likely to generate one output over another. Here, by extending fundamental results from algorith...
Autores principales: | Dingle, Kamaludin, Camargo, Chico Q., Louis, Ard A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03101-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Generic predictions of output probability based on complexities of inputs and outputs
por: Dingle, Kamaludin, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reply to Ocklenburg and Mundorf: The interplay of developmental bias and natural selection
por: Johnston, Iain G., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
On the Convergence of Input-Output Fuzzy Cognitive Maps
por: Harmati, István Á., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A multi-regional input-output table mapping China's economic outputs and interdependencies in 2012
por: Mi, Zhifu, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Biased Connectivity of Brain-wide Inputs to Ventral Subiculum Output Neurons
por: Wee, Ryan W.S., et al.
Publicado: (2020)