Cargando…

Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens

Social insect foragers may specialize on certain resource types. Specialization on pollen or nectar among honeybee foragers is hypothesized to result from associations between reproductive physiology and sensory tuning that evolved in ancestral solitary bees (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simons, Meagan A., Smith, Adam R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5824676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479503
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4415
_version_ 1783302066146377728
author Simons, Meagan A.
Smith, Adam R.
author_facet Simons, Meagan A.
Smith, Adam R.
author_sort Simons, Meagan A.
collection PubMed
description Social insect foragers may specialize on certain resource types. Specialization on pollen or nectar among honeybee foragers is hypothesized to result from associations between reproductive physiology and sensory tuning that evolved in ancestral solitary bees (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis; RGPH). However, the two non-honeybee species studied showed no association between specialization and ovary activation. Here we investigate the bumblebee B. impatiens because it has the most extensively studied pollen/nectar specialization of any bumblebee. We show that ovary size does not differ between pollen specialist, nectar specialist, and generalist foragers, contrary to the predictions of the RGPH. However, we also found mixed support for the second prediction of the RGPH, that sensory sensitivity, measured through proboscis extension response (PER), is greater among pollen foragers. We also found a correlation between foraging activity and ovary size, and foraging activity and relative nectar preference, but no correlation between ovary size and nectar preference. In one colony non-foragers had larger ovaries than foragers, supporting the reproductive conflict and work hypothesis, but in the other colony they did not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5824676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58246762018-02-23 Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens Simons, Meagan A. Smith, Adam R. PeerJ Animal Behavior Social insect foragers may specialize on certain resource types. Specialization on pollen or nectar among honeybee foragers is hypothesized to result from associations between reproductive physiology and sensory tuning that evolved in ancestral solitary bees (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis; RGPH). However, the two non-honeybee species studied showed no association between specialization and ovary activation. Here we investigate the bumblebee B. impatiens because it has the most extensively studied pollen/nectar specialization of any bumblebee. We show that ovary size does not differ between pollen specialist, nectar specialist, and generalist foragers, contrary to the predictions of the RGPH. However, we also found mixed support for the second prediction of the RGPH, that sensory sensitivity, measured through proboscis extension response (PER), is greater among pollen foragers. We also found a correlation between foraging activity and ovary size, and foraging activity and relative nectar preference, but no correlation between ovary size and nectar preference. In one colony non-foragers had larger ovaries than foragers, supporting the reproductive conflict and work hypothesis, but in the other colony they did not. PeerJ Inc. 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5824676/ /pubmed/29479503 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4415 Text en ©2018 Simons and Smith http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Simons, Meagan A.
Smith, Adam R.
Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens
title Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens
title_full Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens
title_fullStr Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens
title_full_unstemmed Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens
title_short Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens
title_sort ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee bombus impatiens
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5824676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479503
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4415
work_keys_str_mv AT simonsmeagana ovaryactivationdoesnotcorrelatewithpollenandnectarforagingspecializationinthebumblebeebombusimpatiens
AT smithadamr ovaryactivationdoesnotcorrelatewithpollenandnectarforagingspecializationinthebumblebeebombusimpatiens