Cargando…
Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens
Social insect foragers may specialize on certain resource types. Specialization on pollen or nectar among honeybee foragers is hypothesized to result from associations between reproductive physiology and sensory tuning that evolved in ancestral solitary bees (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis;...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5824676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479503 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4415 |
_version_ | 1783302066146377728 |
---|---|
author | Simons, Meagan A. Smith, Adam R. |
author_facet | Simons, Meagan A. Smith, Adam R. |
author_sort | Simons, Meagan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Social insect foragers may specialize on certain resource types. Specialization on pollen or nectar among honeybee foragers is hypothesized to result from associations between reproductive physiology and sensory tuning that evolved in ancestral solitary bees (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis; RGPH). However, the two non-honeybee species studied showed no association between specialization and ovary activation. Here we investigate the bumblebee B. impatiens because it has the most extensively studied pollen/nectar specialization of any bumblebee. We show that ovary size does not differ between pollen specialist, nectar specialist, and generalist foragers, contrary to the predictions of the RGPH. However, we also found mixed support for the second prediction of the RGPH, that sensory sensitivity, measured through proboscis extension response (PER), is greater among pollen foragers. We also found a correlation between foraging activity and ovary size, and foraging activity and relative nectar preference, but no correlation between ovary size and nectar preference. In one colony non-foragers had larger ovaries than foragers, supporting the reproductive conflict and work hypothesis, but in the other colony they did not. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5824676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58246762018-02-23 Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens Simons, Meagan A. Smith, Adam R. PeerJ Animal Behavior Social insect foragers may specialize on certain resource types. Specialization on pollen or nectar among honeybee foragers is hypothesized to result from associations between reproductive physiology and sensory tuning that evolved in ancestral solitary bees (the Reproductive Ground-Plan Hypothesis; RGPH). However, the two non-honeybee species studied showed no association between specialization and ovary activation. Here we investigate the bumblebee B. impatiens because it has the most extensively studied pollen/nectar specialization of any bumblebee. We show that ovary size does not differ between pollen specialist, nectar specialist, and generalist foragers, contrary to the predictions of the RGPH. However, we also found mixed support for the second prediction of the RGPH, that sensory sensitivity, measured through proboscis extension response (PER), is greater among pollen foragers. We also found a correlation between foraging activity and ovary size, and foraging activity and relative nectar preference, but no correlation between ovary size and nectar preference. In one colony non-foragers had larger ovaries than foragers, supporting the reproductive conflict and work hypothesis, but in the other colony they did not. PeerJ Inc. 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5824676/ /pubmed/29479503 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4415 Text en ©2018 Simons and Smith http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behavior Simons, Meagan A. Smith, Adam R. Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens |
title | Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens |
title_full | Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens |
title_fullStr | Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens |
title_full_unstemmed | Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens |
title_short | Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens |
title_sort | ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebee bombus impatiens |
topic | Animal Behavior |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5824676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479503 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4415 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonsmeagana ovaryactivationdoesnotcorrelatewithpollenandnectarforagingspecializationinthebumblebeebombusimpatiens AT smithadamr ovaryactivationdoesnotcorrelatewithpollenandnectarforagingspecializationinthebumblebeebombusimpatiens |