Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Early Results Using a Hybrid Physeal-Sparing Technique

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the skeletally immature patient is frequently performed in hopes of preventing new or additional chondral damage and meniscal injuries. Patients within a few years of skeletal maturity are more at risk for ACL injuries than prepubescent patients, about whom several physeal-sparing techniques have been described. Reconstruction techniques in the former higher risk group need to be better understood. PURPOSE: To review a series of adolescent patients with ACL injuries surgically treated with the hybrid physeal-sparing technique. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Surgical logs of ACL reconstructions (ACLRs) performed at a single pediatric/adolescent sports medicine center over a 6-year period were reviewed. Patients with open physes who had undergone ACLR with a femoral physeal-sparing tunnel and transphyseal tibial tunnel were identified. Their demographics, operative reports, rehabilitative course, time to return to play, outcome scores, and postoperative radiographs were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with a mean chronological age and bone age of 13.0 and 13.6 years, respectively, were identified. Examination and subjective outcome scores were obtained at a mean of 19 months and overall demonstrated positive results, with a mean Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) score of 96.0 and a mean Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score of 89.1. Full-length mechanical axis films obtained at a mean 21 months postoperatively demonstrated no leg-length discrepancies or angular deformities in 21 of 23 patients. Two patients had an identified growth disturbance in the form of femoral and tibial growth acceleration on the ACL-reconstructed limb. CONCLUSION: The femoral physeal-sparing with transphyseal tibial drilling “hybrid” technique in skeletally maturing patients appears to have a high rate of success with low morbidity. However, the possibility of physeal abnormalities does exist, which demonstrates the importance of a close postoperative follow-up and evaluation until skeletal maturity is achieved. ACLR in skeletally immature patients is performed on an increasingly regular basis. Establishing the best and safest technique to do so is therefore important.