Cargando…

Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer

BACKGROUND: The Air-Smart Spirometer is the first portable device accepted by the European Community (EC) that performs spirometric measurements by a turbine mechanism and displays the results on a smartphone or a tablet. METHODS: In this multicenter, descriptive and cross-sectional prospective stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramos Hernández, Cristina, Núñez Fernández, Marta, Pallares Sanmartín, Abel, Mouronte Roibas, Cecilia, Cerdeira Domínguez, Luz, Botana Rial, Maria Isabel, Blanco Cid, Nagore, Fernández Villar, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29474502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192789
_version_ 1783302132859928576
author Ramos Hernández, Cristina
Núñez Fernández, Marta
Pallares Sanmartín, Abel
Mouronte Roibas, Cecilia
Cerdeira Domínguez, Luz
Botana Rial, Maria Isabel
Blanco Cid, Nagore
Fernández Villar, Alberto
author_facet Ramos Hernández, Cristina
Núñez Fernández, Marta
Pallares Sanmartín, Abel
Mouronte Roibas, Cecilia
Cerdeira Domínguez, Luz
Botana Rial, Maria Isabel
Blanco Cid, Nagore
Fernández Villar, Alberto
author_sort Ramos Hernández, Cristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Air-Smart Spirometer is the first portable device accepted by the European Community (EC) that performs spirometric measurements by a turbine mechanism and displays the results on a smartphone or a tablet. METHODS: In this multicenter, descriptive and cross-sectional prospective study carried out in 2 hospital centers, we compare FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio measured with the Air Smart-Spirometer device and a conventional spirometer, and analyze the ability of this new portable device to detect obstructions. Patients were included for 2 consecutive months. We calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) and likelihood ratio (LR +, LR-) as well as the Kappa Index to evaluate the concordance between the two devices for the detection of obstruction. The agreement and relation between the values of FEV1 and FVC in absolute value and the FEV1/FVC ratio measured by both devices were analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) respectively. RESULTS: 200 patients (100 from each center) were included with a mean age of 57 (± 14) years, 110 were men (55%). Obstruction was detected by conventional spirometry in 73 patients (40.1%). Using a FEV1/FVC ratio smaller than 0.7 to detect obstruction with the Air Smart-Spirometer, the kappa index was 0.88, sensitivity (90.4%), specificity (97.2%), PPV (95.7%), NPV (93.7%), positive likelihood ratio (32.29), and negative likelihood ratio (0.10). The ICC and r between FEV1, FVC, and FEV1 / FVC ratio measured by the Air Smart Spirometer and the conventional spirometer were all higher than 0.94. CONCLUSION: The Air-Smart Spirometer is a simple and very precise instrument for detecting obstructive airway diseases. It is easy to use, which could make it especially useful non-specialized care and in other areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5825056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58250562018-03-19 Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer Ramos Hernández, Cristina Núñez Fernández, Marta Pallares Sanmartín, Abel Mouronte Roibas, Cecilia Cerdeira Domínguez, Luz Botana Rial, Maria Isabel Blanco Cid, Nagore Fernández Villar, Alberto PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Air-Smart Spirometer is the first portable device accepted by the European Community (EC) that performs spirometric measurements by a turbine mechanism and displays the results on a smartphone or a tablet. METHODS: In this multicenter, descriptive and cross-sectional prospective study carried out in 2 hospital centers, we compare FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio measured with the Air Smart-Spirometer device and a conventional spirometer, and analyze the ability of this new portable device to detect obstructions. Patients were included for 2 consecutive months. We calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) and likelihood ratio (LR +, LR-) as well as the Kappa Index to evaluate the concordance between the two devices for the detection of obstruction. The agreement and relation between the values of FEV1 and FVC in absolute value and the FEV1/FVC ratio measured by both devices were analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) respectively. RESULTS: 200 patients (100 from each center) were included with a mean age of 57 (± 14) years, 110 were men (55%). Obstruction was detected by conventional spirometry in 73 patients (40.1%). Using a FEV1/FVC ratio smaller than 0.7 to detect obstruction with the Air Smart-Spirometer, the kappa index was 0.88, sensitivity (90.4%), specificity (97.2%), PPV (95.7%), NPV (93.7%), positive likelihood ratio (32.29), and negative likelihood ratio (0.10). The ICC and r between FEV1, FVC, and FEV1 / FVC ratio measured by the Air Smart Spirometer and the conventional spirometer were all higher than 0.94. CONCLUSION: The Air-Smart Spirometer is a simple and very precise instrument for detecting obstructive airway diseases. It is easy to use, which could make it especially useful non-specialized care and in other areas. Public Library of Science 2018-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5825056/ /pubmed/29474502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192789 Text en © 2018 Ramos Hernández et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ramos Hernández, Cristina
Núñez Fernández, Marta
Pallares Sanmartín, Abel
Mouronte Roibas, Cecilia
Cerdeira Domínguez, Luz
Botana Rial, Maria Isabel
Blanco Cid, Nagore
Fernández Villar, Alberto
Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer
title Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer
title_full Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer
title_fullStr Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer
title_short Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer
title_sort validation of the portable air-smart spirometer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29474502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192789
work_keys_str_mv AT ramoshernandezcristina validationoftheportableairsmartspirometer
AT nunezfernandezmarta validationoftheportableairsmartspirometer
AT pallaressanmartinabel validationoftheportableairsmartspirometer
AT mouronteroibascecilia validationoftheportableairsmartspirometer
AT cerdeiradominguezluz validationoftheportableairsmartspirometer
AT botanarialmariaisabel validationoftheportableairsmartspirometer
AT blancocidnagore validationoftheportableairsmartspirometer
AT fernandezvillaralberto validationoftheportableairsmartspirometer