Cargando…

Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains

The majority of the proteins encoded in the genomes of eukaryotes contain more than one domain. Reasons for high prevalence of multi-domain proteins in various organisms have been attributed to higher stability and functional and folding advantages over single-domain proteins. Despite these advantag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vishwanath, Sneha, de Brevern, Alexandre G., Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29432415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006008
_version_ 1783302159684599808
author Vishwanath, Sneha
de Brevern, Alexandre G.
Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy
author_facet Vishwanath, Sneha
de Brevern, Alexandre G.
Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy
author_sort Vishwanath, Sneha
collection PubMed
description The majority of the proteins encoded in the genomes of eukaryotes contain more than one domain. Reasons for high prevalence of multi-domain proteins in various organisms have been attributed to higher stability and functional and folding advantages over single-domain proteins. Despite these advantages, many proteins are composed of only one domain while their homologous domains are part of multi-domain proteins. In the study presented here, differences in the properties of protein domains in single-domain and multi-domain systems and their influence on functions are discussed. We studied 20 pairs of identical protein domains, which were crystallized in two forms (a) tethered to other proteins domains and (b) tethered to fewer protein domains than (a) or not tethered to any protein domain. Results suggest that tethering of domains in multi-domain proteins influences the structural, dynamic and energetic properties of the constituent protein domains. 50% of the protein domain pairs show significant structural deviations while 90% of the protein domain pairs show differences in dynamics and 12% of the residues show differences in the energetics. To gain further insights on the influence of tethering on the function of the domains, 4 pairs of homologous protein domains, where one of them is a full-length single-domain protein and the other protein domain is a part of a multi-domain protein, were studied. Analyses showed that identical and structurally equivalent functional residues show differential dynamics in homologous protein domains; though comparable dynamics between in-silico generated chimera protein and multi-domain proteins were observed. From these observations, the differences observed in the functions of homologous proteins could be attributed to the presence of tethered domain. Overall, we conclude that tethered domains in multi-domain proteins not only provide stability or folding advantages but also influence pathways resulting in differences in function or regulatory properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5825166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58251662018-03-15 Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains Vishwanath, Sneha de Brevern, Alexandre G. Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy PLoS Comput Biol Research Article The majority of the proteins encoded in the genomes of eukaryotes contain more than one domain. Reasons for high prevalence of multi-domain proteins in various organisms have been attributed to higher stability and functional and folding advantages over single-domain proteins. Despite these advantages, many proteins are composed of only one domain while their homologous domains are part of multi-domain proteins. In the study presented here, differences in the properties of protein domains in single-domain and multi-domain systems and their influence on functions are discussed. We studied 20 pairs of identical protein domains, which were crystallized in two forms (a) tethered to other proteins domains and (b) tethered to fewer protein domains than (a) or not tethered to any protein domain. Results suggest that tethering of domains in multi-domain proteins influences the structural, dynamic and energetic properties of the constituent protein domains. 50% of the protein domain pairs show significant structural deviations while 90% of the protein domain pairs show differences in dynamics and 12% of the residues show differences in the energetics. To gain further insights on the influence of tethering on the function of the domains, 4 pairs of homologous protein domains, where one of them is a full-length single-domain protein and the other protein domain is a part of a multi-domain protein, were studied. Analyses showed that identical and structurally equivalent functional residues show differential dynamics in homologous protein domains; though comparable dynamics between in-silico generated chimera protein and multi-domain proteins were observed. From these observations, the differences observed in the functions of homologous proteins could be attributed to the presence of tethered domain. Overall, we conclude that tethered domains in multi-domain proteins not only provide stability or folding advantages but also influence pathways resulting in differences in function or regulatory properties. Public Library of Science 2018-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5825166/ /pubmed/29432415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006008 Text en © 2018 Vishwanath et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vishwanath, Sneha
de Brevern, Alexandre G.
Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy
Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains
title Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains
title_full Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains
title_fullStr Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains
title_full_unstemmed Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains
title_short Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains
title_sort same but not alike: structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29432415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006008
work_keys_str_mv AT vishwanathsneha samebutnotalikestructureflexibilityandenergeticsofdomainsinmultidomainproteinsareinfluencedbythepresenceofotherdomains
AT debrevernalexandreg samebutnotalikestructureflexibilityandenergeticsofdomainsinmultidomainproteinsareinfluencedbythepresenceofotherdomains
AT srinivasannarayanaswamy samebutnotalikestructureflexibilityandenergeticsofdomainsinmultidomainproteinsareinfluencedbythepresenceofotherdomains