Cargando…

Delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to determine if the delineation of one or two optimally chosen intracranial areas (ICA) is enough to achieve adequate estimates of intracranial volume (ICV) in magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: The correlations of 62 fully delineated ICVs with four type...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klasson, Niklas, Olsson, Erik, Eckerström, Carl, Malmgren, Helge, Wallin, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0583-0
_version_ 1783302169057820672
author Klasson, Niklas
Olsson, Erik
Eckerström, Carl
Malmgren, Helge
Wallin, Anders
author_facet Klasson, Niklas
Olsson, Erik
Eckerström, Carl
Malmgren, Helge
Wallin, Anders
author_sort Klasson, Niklas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to determine if the delineation of one or two optimally chosen intracranial areas (ICA) is enough to achieve adequate estimates of intracranial volume (ICV) in magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: The correlations of 62 fully delineated ICVs with four types of ICV estimates were calculated. The estimate types were: (1) a single midsagittal ICA, (2) single ICA multiplied by the intracranial width perpendicular to the ICA, (3) sum of two ICAs multiplied by the perpendicular intracranial width and (4) shape-preserving piecewise cubic interpolation using two ICAs. For methods 2–4, the fully delineated ICVs were randomly separated into an evaluation and a validation set of equal size. Method 1 was validated against all of the fully delineated ICVs. RESULTS: Estimates from method 1 had a Pearson correlation of 0.904 with fully delineated ICV. For method 2, the correlation was 0.986 when delineating the sagittal ICA at 31% of the sagittal intracranial width. For methods 3 and 4, the correlations were both 0.997 when delineating the sagittal ICAs at 17.5 and 64% and at 12 and 64% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delineation of two specific intracranial areas is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation. MAIN MESSAGES: • Delineation of two specific intracranial areas is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation. • The estimates had a Pearson correlation of 0.997 with intracranial volume. • The estimation should take no more than 5 min. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13244-017-0583-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5825311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58253112018-02-27 Delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation Klasson, Niklas Olsson, Erik Eckerström, Carl Malmgren, Helge Wallin, Anders Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to determine if the delineation of one or two optimally chosen intracranial areas (ICA) is enough to achieve adequate estimates of intracranial volume (ICV) in magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: The correlations of 62 fully delineated ICVs with four types of ICV estimates were calculated. The estimate types were: (1) a single midsagittal ICA, (2) single ICA multiplied by the intracranial width perpendicular to the ICA, (3) sum of two ICAs multiplied by the perpendicular intracranial width and (4) shape-preserving piecewise cubic interpolation using two ICAs. For methods 2–4, the fully delineated ICVs were randomly separated into an evaluation and a validation set of equal size. Method 1 was validated against all of the fully delineated ICVs. RESULTS: Estimates from method 1 had a Pearson correlation of 0.904 with fully delineated ICV. For method 2, the correlation was 0.986 when delineating the sagittal ICA at 31% of the sagittal intracranial width. For methods 3 and 4, the correlations were both 0.997 when delineating the sagittal ICAs at 17.5 and 64% and at 12 and 64% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delineation of two specific intracranial areas is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation. MAIN MESSAGES: • Delineation of two specific intracranial areas is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation. • The estimates had a Pearson correlation of 0.997 with intracranial volume. • The estimation should take no more than 5 min. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13244-017-0583-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5825311/ /pubmed/29374387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0583-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Klasson, Niklas
Olsson, Erik
Eckerström, Carl
Malmgren, Helge
Wallin, Anders
Delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation
title Delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation
title_full Delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation
title_fullStr Delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation
title_full_unstemmed Delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation
title_short Delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation
title_sort delineation of two intracranial areas and the perpendicular intracranial width is sufficient for intracranial volume estimation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29374387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0583-0
work_keys_str_mv AT klassonniklas delineationoftwointracranialareasandtheperpendicularintracranialwidthissufficientforintracranialvolumeestimation
AT olssonerik delineationoftwointracranialareasandtheperpendicularintracranialwidthissufficientforintracranialvolumeestimation
AT eckerstromcarl delineationoftwointracranialareasandtheperpendicularintracranialwidthissufficientforintracranialvolumeestimation
AT malmgrenhelge delineationoftwointracranialareasandtheperpendicularintracranialwidthissufficientforintracranialvolumeestimation
AT wallinanders delineationoftwointracranialareasandtheperpendicularintracranialwidthissufficientforintracranialvolumeestimation