Cargando…

Quantitative Testing of Prescriber Knowledge Regarding the Risks and Safe Use of Albiglutide

BACKGROUND: The risk of pancreatitis and potential risk of medullary thyroid carcinoma associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists prompted the US Food and Drug Administration to require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for albiglutide, including education for prescribers and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koro, Carol, Pientka, Janet, Bainbridge, Veronica, O’Donnell, Natalie, Stender, Monika, Stemhagen, Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0128-3
_version_ 1783302177614200832
author Koro, Carol
Pientka, Janet
Bainbridge, Veronica
O’Donnell, Natalie
Stender, Monika
Stemhagen, Annette
author_facet Koro, Carol
Pientka, Janet
Bainbridge, Veronica
O’Donnell, Natalie
Stender, Monika
Stemhagen, Annette
author_sort Koro, Carol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The risk of pancreatitis and potential risk of medullary thyroid carcinoma associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists prompted the US Food and Drug Administration to require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for albiglutide, including education for prescribers and subsequent assessment of their knowledge of the risks and safe use of albiglutide via a quantitative survey. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess prescribers’ knowledge of the risks related to medullary thyroid carcinoma, pancreatitis, and the appropriate patient population for albiglutide. METHODS: Two Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy surveys were conducted 18 months and 3 years after albiglutide was launched. Primary analyses evaluated correct response rates for each question. Secondary analyses evaluated the number of correct responses and the percentage of respondents scoring at/above the target comprehension thresholds (75% at 18 months; 80% at 3 years), which were selected based on discussion with the Food and Drug Administration and current standards for Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy assessments, for each key risk message. RESULTS: The correct response rate for individual questions ranged from 68.2 to 97.9% (18-month survey) and from 69.4 to 98.1% (3-year survey). For the secondary analysis, 79.5, 86.7, and 86.7% of respondents in the 18-month survey answered ≥ 75% of the questions correctly and 70.8, 90.9, and 54.1% of respondents in the 3-year survey answered ≥ 80% of the questions correctly for key risk messages related to medullary thyroid carcinoma, pancreatitis, and appropriate patient population, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results indicated most, but not all, prescribers are knowledgeable regarding the risks and safe use of albiglutide. Additional education to address gaps in knowledge could further improve risk mitigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-017-0128-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5825391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58253912018-02-28 Quantitative Testing of Prescriber Knowledge Regarding the Risks and Safe Use of Albiglutide Koro, Carol Pientka, Janet Bainbridge, Veronica O’Donnell, Natalie Stender, Monika Stemhagen, Annette Drugs Real World Outcomes Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The risk of pancreatitis and potential risk of medullary thyroid carcinoma associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists prompted the US Food and Drug Administration to require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for albiglutide, including education for prescribers and subsequent assessment of their knowledge of the risks and safe use of albiglutide via a quantitative survey. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess prescribers’ knowledge of the risks related to medullary thyroid carcinoma, pancreatitis, and the appropriate patient population for albiglutide. METHODS: Two Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy surveys were conducted 18 months and 3 years after albiglutide was launched. Primary analyses evaluated correct response rates for each question. Secondary analyses evaluated the number of correct responses and the percentage of respondents scoring at/above the target comprehension thresholds (75% at 18 months; 80% at 3 years), which were selected based on discussion with the Food and Drug Administration and current standards for Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy assessments, for each key risk message. RESULTS: The correct response rate for individual questions ranged from 68.2 to 97.9% (18-month survey) and from 69.4 to 98.1% (3-year survey). For the secondary analysis, 79.5, 86.7, and 86.7% of respondents in the 18-month survey answered ≥ 75% of the questions correctly and 70.8, 90.9, and 54.1% of respondents in the 3-year survey answered ≥ 80% of the questions correctly for key risk messages related to medullary thyroid carcinoma, pancreatitis, and appropriate patient population, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results indicated most, but not all, prescribers are knowledgeable regarding the risks and safe use of albiglutide. Additional education to address gaps in knowledge could further improve risk mitigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-017-0128-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5825391/ /pubmed/29218595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0128-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Koro, Carol
Pientka, Janet
Bainbridge, Veronica
O’Donnell, Natalie
Stender, Monika
Stemhagen, Annette
Quantitative Testing of Prescriber Knowledge Regarding the Risks and Safe Use of Albiglutide
title Quantitative Testing of Prescriber Knowledge Regarding the Risks and Safe Use of Albiglutide
title_full Quantitative Testing of Prescriber Knowledge Regarding the Risks and Safe Use of Albiglutide
title_fullStr Quantitative Testing of Prescriber Knowledge Regarding the Risks and Safe Use of Albiglutide
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Testing of Prescriber Knowledge Regarding the Risks and Safe Use of Albiglutide
title_short Quantitative Testing of Prescriber Knowledge Regarding the Risks and Safe Use of Albiglutide
title_sort quantitative testing of prescriber knowledge regarding the risks and safe use of albiglutide
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0128-3
work_keys_str_mv AT korocarol quantitativetestingofprescriberknowledgeregardingtherisksandsafeuseofalbiglutide
AT pientkajanet quantitativetestingofprescriberknowledgeregardingtherisksandsafeuseofalbiglutide
AT bainbridgeveronica quantitativetestingofprescriberknowledgeregardingtherisksandsafeuseofalbiglutide
AT odonnellnatalie quantitativetestingofprescriberknowledgeregardingtherisksandsafeuseofalbiglutide
AT stendermonika quantitativetestingofprescriberknowledgeregardingtherisksandsafeuseofalbiglutide
AT stemhagenannette quantitativetestingofprescriberknowledgeregardingtherisksandsafeuseofalbiglutide