Cargando…

Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice

Full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP) is generally believed to result from a sliding hernia through a pelvic fascial defect, or from rectal intussusception. The currently accepted cause is a pelvic floor disorder. Surgery is the only definitive treatment, although the ideal therapeutic option for FT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hori, Tomohide, Yasukawa, Daiki, Machimoto, Takafumi, Kadokawa, Yoshio, Hata, Toshiyuki, Ito, Tatsuo, Kato, Shigeru, Aisu, Yuki, Kimura, Yusuke, Takamatsu, Yuichi, Kitano, Taku, Yoshimura, Tsunehiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507465
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2017.0220
_version_ 1783302262550953984
author Hori, Tomohide
Yasukawa, Daiki
Machimoto, Takafumi
Kadokawa, Yoshio
Hata, Toshiyuki
Ito, Tatsuo
Kato, Shigeru
Aisu, Yuki
Kimura, Yusuke
Takamatsu, Yuichi
Kitano, Taku
Yoshimura, Tsunehiro
author_facet Hori, Tomohide
Yasukawa, Daiki
Machimoto, Takafumi
Kadokawa, Yoshio
Hata, Toshiyuki
Ito, Tatsuo
Kato, Shigeru
Aisu, Yuki
Kimura, Yusuke
Takamatsu, Yuichi
Kitano, Taku
Yoshimura, Tsunehiro
author_sort Hori, Tomohide
collection PubMed
description Full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP) is generally believed to result from a sliding hernia through a pelvic fascial defect, or from rectal intussusception. The currently accepted cause is a pelvic floor disorder. Surgery is the only definitive treatment, although the ideal therapeutic option for FTRP has not been determined. Auffret reported the first FTRP surgery using a perineal approach in 1882, and rectopexy using conventional laparotomy was first described by Sudeck in 1922. Laparoscopy was first used by Bermann in 1992, and laparoscopic surgery is now used worldwide; robotic surgery was first described by Munz in 2004. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates with FTRP surgery are an active research area and in this article we review previously documented surgeries and discuss the best approach for FTRP. We also introduce our institution’s laparoscopic surgical technique for FTRP (laparoscopic rectopexy with posterior wrap and peritoneal closure). Therapeutic decisions must be individualized to each patient, while the surgeon’s experience must also be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5825948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58259482018-03-05 Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice Hori, Tomohide Yasukawa, Daiki Machimoto, Takafumi Kadokawa, Yoshio Hata, Toshiyuki Ito, Tatsuo Kato, Shigeru Aisu, Yuki Kimura, Yusuke Takamatsu, Yuichi Kitano, Taku Yoshimura, Tsunehiro Ann Gastroenterol Review Article Full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP) is generally believed to result from a sliding hernia through a pelvic fascial defect, or from rectal intussusception. The currently accepted cause is a pelvic floor disorder. Surgery is the only definitive treatment, although the ideal therapeutic option for FTRP has not been determined. Auffret reported the first FTRP surgery using a perineal approach in 1882, and rectopexy using conventional laparotomy was first described by Sudeck in 1922. Laparoscopy was first used by Bermann in 1992, and laparoscopic surgery is now used worldwide; robotic surgery was first described by Munz in 2004. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates with FTRP surgery are an active research area and in this article we review previously documented surgeries and discuss the best approach for FTRP. We also introduce our institution’s laparoscopic surgical technique for FTRP (laparoscopic rectopexy with posterior wrap and peritoneal closure). Therapeutic decisions must be individualized to each patient, while the surgeon’s experience must also be considered. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2018 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5825948/ /pubmed/29507465 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2017.0220 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hori, Tomohide
Yasukawa, Daiki
Machimoto, Takafumi
Kadokawa, Yoshio
Hata, Toshiyuki
Ito, Tatsuo
Kato, Shigeru
Aisu, Yuki
Kimura, Yusuke
Takamatsu, Yuichi
Kitano, Taku
Yoshimura, Tsunehiro
Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice
title Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice
title_full Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice
title_fullStr Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice
title_full_unstemmed Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice
title_short Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice
title_sort surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5825948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507465
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2017.0220
work_keys_str_mv AT horitomohide surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT yasukawadaiki surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT machimototakafumi surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT kadokawayoshio surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT hatatoshiyuki surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT itotatsuo surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT katoshigeru surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT aisuyuki surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT kimurayusuke surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT takamatsuyuichi surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT kitanotaku surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice
AT yoshimuratsunehiro surgicaloptionsforfullthicknessrectalprolapsecurrentstatusandinstitutionalchoice