Cargando…

Interorgan Molecular Communication Strategies of “Local” and “Systemic” Innate Immune Responses in Mosquito Anopheles stephensi

Mosquitoes that transmit many deadly infectious diseases also need to keep fighting against many microbial infections. Constitutive expression of multiple antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in almost all body tissues is believed to facilitate the effective management of these local infections. When any i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das De, Tanwee, Sharma, Punita, Thomas, Tina, Singla, Deepak, Tevatiya, Sanjay, Kumari, Seena, Chauhan, Charu, Rani, Jyoti, Srivastava, Vartika, Kaur, Ramandeep, Pandey, Kailash C., Dixit, Rajnikant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00148
_version_ 1783302291923664896
author Das De, Tanwee
Sharma, Punita
Thomas, Tina
Singla, Deepak
Tevatiya, Sanjay
Kumari, Seena
Chauhan, Charu
Rani, Jyoti
Srivastava, Vartika
Kaur, Ramandeep
Pandey, Kailash C.
Dixit, Rajnikant
author_facet Das De, Tanwee
Sharma, Punita
Thomas, Tina
Singla, Deepak
Tevatiya, Sanjay
Kumari, Seena
Chauhan, Charu
Rani, Jyoti
Srivastava, Vartika
Kaur, Ramandeep
Pandey, Kailash C.
Dixit, Rajnikant
author_sort Das De, Tanwee
collection PubMed
description Mosquitoes that transmit many deadly infectious diseases also need to keep fighting against many microbial infections. Constitutive expression of multiple antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in almost all body tissues is believed to facilitate the effective management of these local infections. When any infection breaches the local barrier, AMPs are induced rapidly in non-target tissues such as hemocytes (HCs) and establish their co-ordination with systemic immune effectors to clear off the body infection. But how interorgan immune communication is managed during local and systemic infections remain largely unknown. To understand this interorgan molecular relationship, we identified, extensively profiled and compared the expression of AMPs in three important mosquito tissues viz. midgut, fat body (FB), and HCs. dsRNA-mediated AMPs silencing suggests that mosquito tissues are able to manage an optimal expression of AMPs at the physiological level. We also examined the possible contribution of two important immune regulator genes relish (REL) and nitric oxide synthase, controlling AMPs expression in these tissues during local or systemic infections. We show that each tissue has a unique ability to respond to local/systemic challenges, but HCs are more specialized to recognize and discriminate-specific antigens than gut and FB. Our investigation also revealed that both REL and NO participate in the overall management of the interorgan immune responses, but at the same time each tissue also has its own ability to maintain the interorgan flow of signals. In our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study examining the interorgan immune relationship in the mosquito.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5826171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58261712018-03-07 Interorgan Molecular Communication Strategies of “Local” and “Systemic” Innate Immune Responses in Mosquito Anopheles stephensi Das De, Tanwee Sharma, Punita Thomas, Tina Singla, Deepak Tevatiya, Sanjay Kumari, Seena Chauhan, Charu Rani, Jyoti Srivastava, Vartika Kaur, Ramandeep Pandey, Kailash C. Dixit, Rajnikant Front Immunol Immunology Mosquitoes that transmit many deadly infectious diseases also need to keep fighting against many microbial infections. Constitutive expression of multiple antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in almost all body tissues is believed to facilitate the effective management of these local infections. When any infection breaches the local barrier, AMPs are induced rapidly in non-target tissues such as hemocytes (HCs) and establish their co-ordination with systemic immune effectors to clear off the body infection. But how interorgan immune communication is managed during local and systemic infections remain largely unknown. To understand this interorgan molecular relationship, we identified, extensively profiled and compared the expression of AMPs in three important mosquito tissues viz. midgut, fat body (FB), and HCs. dsRNA-mediated AMPs silencing suggests that mosquito tissues are able to manage an optimal expression of AMPs at the physiological level. We also examined the possible contribution of two important immune regulator genes relish (REL) and nitric oxide synthase, controlling AMPs expression in these tissues during local or systemic infections. We show that each tissue has a unique ability to respond to local/systemic challenges, but HCs are more specialized to recognize and discriminate-specific antigens than gut and FB. Our investigation also revealed that both REL and NO participate in the overall management of the interorgan immune responses, but at the same time each tissue also has its own ability to maintain the interorgan flow of signals. In our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study examining the interorgan immune relationship in the mosquito. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5826171/ /pubmed/29515567 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00148 Text en Copyright © 2018 Das De, Sharma, Thomas, Singla, Tevatiya, Kumari, Chauhan, Rani, Srivastava, Kaur, Pandey and Dixit. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Das De, Tanwee
Sharma, Punita
Thomas, Tina
Singla, Deepak
Tevatiya, Sanjay
Kumari, Seena
Chauhan, Charu
Rani, Jyoti
Srivastava, Vartika
Kaur, Ramandeep
Pandey, Kailash C.
Dixit, Rajnikant
Interorgan Molecular Communication Strategies of “Local” and “Systemic” Innate Immune Responses in Mosquito Anopheles stephensi
title Interorgan Molecular Communication Strategies of “Local” and “Systemic” Innate Immune Responses in Mosquito Anopheles stephensi
title_full Interorgan Molecular Communication Strategies of “Local” and “Systemic” Innate Immune Responses in Mosquito Anopheles stephensi
title_fullStr Interorgan Molecular Communication Strategies of “Local” and “Systemic” Innate Immune Responses in Mosquito Anopheles stephensi
title_full_unstemmed Interorgan Molecular Communication Strategies of “Local” and “Systemic” Innate Immune Responses in Mosquito Anopheles stephensi
title_short Interorgan Molecular Communication Strategies of “Local” and “Systemic” Innate Immune Responses in Mosquito Anopheles stephensi
title_sort interorgan molecular communication strategies of “local” and “systemic” innate immune responses in mosquito anopheles stephensi
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00148
work_keys_str_mv AT dasdetanwee interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT sharmapunita interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT thomastina interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT singladeepak interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT tevatiyasanjay interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT kumariseena interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT chauhancharu interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT ranijyoti interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT srivastavavartika interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT kaurramandeep interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT pandeykailashc interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi
AT dixitrajnikant interorganmolecularcommunicationstrategiesoflocalandsystemicinnateimmuneresponsesinmosquitoanophelesstephensi