Cargando…

A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus

While brain stimulation techniques have been examined as treatment options for chronic tinnitus for many years, they have recently been extended to multimodal treatment approaches. As chronic tinnitus is often accompanied by comorbid muscular tension in the neck and back, we performed a one-arm pilo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vielsmeier, Veronika, Schecklmann, Martin, Schlee, Winfried, Kreuzer, Peter M., Poeppl, Timm B., Rupprecht, Rainer, Langguth, Berthold, Lehner, Astrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00068
_version_ 1783302303326928896
author Vielsmeier, Veronika
Schecklmann, Martin
Schlee, Winfried
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Poeppl, Timm B.
Rupprecht, Rainer
Langguth, Berthold
Lehner, Astrid
author_facet Vielsmeier, Veronika
Schecklmann, Martin
Schlee, Winfried
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Poeppl, Timm B.
Rupprecht, Rainer
Langguth, Berthold
Lehner, Astrid
author_sort Vielsmeier, Veronika
collection PubMed
description While brain stimulation techniques have been examined as treatment options for chronic tinnitus for many years, they have recently been extended to multimodal treatment approaches. As chronic tinnitus is often accompanied by comorbid muscular tension in the neck and back, we performed a one-arm pilot study to explore the feasibility of a new multimodal treatment approach. In detail, repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) of the back was performed before and after each session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain. Data of 41 patients were analyzed, all of which were treated with ten sessions of rTMS of the left prefrontal and left temporoparietal cortex followed by rPMS of the neck and back muscles. Tinnitus severity was measured using the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ). Neck pain was assessed using the neck pain and disability scale (NPAD). The new treatment approach was feasible and well accepted by the majority of patients. However, the overall patient group did not improve significantly in either of the questionnaires. If patients were divided in different subgroups depending on whether they were suffering from neck pain or somatosensory tinnitus, explorative post-hoc tests suggested differential effects: patients with both neck pain and somatosensory tinnitus had better outcomes than patients without those conditions or with neck pain only. This was true for both the TQ and the NPAD. This effect was of transient nature though: the TQ score went back to its baseline level after a follow-up period of 12 weeks. Based on our results we recommend that in studies that investigate tinnitus treatments targeting somatosensory afferents patients should be stratified according to somatic co-morbidities and somatosensory influence on the tinnitus percept. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02306447.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5826218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58262182018-03-07 A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus Vielsmeier, Veronika Schecklmann, Martin Schlee, Winfried Kreuzer, Peter M. Poeppl, Timm B. Rupprecht, Rainer Langguth, Berthold Lehner, Astrid Front Neurosci Neuroscience While brain stimulation techniques have been examined as treatment options for chronic tinnitus for many years, they have recently been extended to multimodal treatment approaches. As chronic tinnitus is often accompanied by comorbid muscular tension in the neck and back, we performed a one-arm pilot study to explore the feasibility of a new multimodal treatment approach. In detail, repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) of the back was performed before and after each session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain. Data of 41 patients were analyzed, all of which were treated with ten sessions of rTMS of the left prefrontal and left temporoparietal cortex followed by rPMS of the neck and back muscles. Tinnitus severity was measured using the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ). Neck pain was assessed using the neck pain and disability scale (NPAD). The new treatment approach was feasible and well accepted by the majority of patients. However, the overall patient group did not improve significantly in either of the questionnaires. If patients were divided in different subgroups depending on whether they were suffering from neck pain or somatosensory tinnitus, explorative post-hoc tests suggested differential effects: patients with both neck pain and somatosensory tinnitus had better outcomes than patients without those conditions or with neck pain only. This was true for both the TQ and the NPAD. This effect was of transient nature though: the TQ score went back to its baseline level after a follow-up period of 12 weeks. Based on our results we recommend that in studies that investigate tinnitus treatments targeting somatosensory afferents patients should be stratified according to somatic co-morbidities and somatosensory influence on the tinnitus percept. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02306447. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5826218/ /pubmed/29515350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00068 Text en Copyright © 2018 Vielsmeier, Schecklmann, Schlee, Kreuzer, Poeppl, Rupprecht, Langguth and Lehner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Vielsmeier, Veronika
Schecklmann, Martin
Schlee, Winfried
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Poeppl, Timm B.
Rupprecht, Rainer
Langguth, Berthold
Lehner, Astrid
A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus
title A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus
title_full A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus
title_fullStr A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus
title_short A Pilot Study of Peripheral Muscle Magnetic Stimulation as Add-on Treatment to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus
title_sort pilot study of peripheral muscle magnetic stimulation as add-on treatment to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic tinnitus
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00068
work_keys_str_mv AT vielsmeierveronika apilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT schecklmannmartin apilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT schleewinfried apilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT kreuzerpeterm apilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT poeppltimmb apilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT rupprechtrainer apilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT langguthberthold apilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT lehnerastrid apilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT vielsmeierveronika pilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT schecklmannmartin pilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT schleewinfried pilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT kreuzerpeterm pilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT poeppltimmb pilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT rupprechtrainer pilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT langguthberthold pilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus
AT lehnerastrid pilotstudyofperipheralmusclemagneticstimulationasaddontreatmenttorepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinchronictinnitus