Cargando…

Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies

The establishment of human gut microbiota commences initially in utero. Meconium—the first fecal material passed after birth—can be used to study fetal gut contents; however, processing meconium samples for microbiome studies presents significant technical challenges. Meconium hosts a low biomass mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stinson, Lisa F., Keelan, Jeffrey A., Payne, Matthew S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00270
_version_ 1783302305243725824
author Stinson, Lisa F.
Keelan, Jeffrey A.
Payne, Matthew S.
author_facet Stinson, Lisa F.
Keelan, Jeffrey A.
Payne, Matthew S.
author_sort Stinson, Lisa F.
collection PubMed
description The establishment of human gut microbiota commences initially in utero. Meconium—the first fecal material passed after birth—can be used to study fetal gut contents; however, processing meconium samples for microbiome studies presents significant technical challenges. Meconium hosts a low biomass microbiome, is tar-like in texture and contains high concentrations of PCR inhibitors. This study aimed to evaluate four different DNA extraction methods to elucidate the most effective method for bacterial DNA recovery and sequencing analysis from first-pass meconium. Samples from five infants were collected and processed using the following extraction kits: (1) Qiagen QIAamp DNA Stool Mini (QS); (2) Qiagen QIAamp DNA Microbiome (QM); (3) MoBio PowerSoil (PS); (4) MoBio MagAttract PowerMicrobiome (PM). Additionally, Kit PM was employed with a double inhibitor removal treatment (IRT) step (PM2). Bacterial DNA recovery was assessed by qPCR. Any PCR inhibition in samples was measured by spiking DNA eluates with 0.1 ng of pure Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) DNA followed by qPCR quantitation. Kit PM yielded the highest average total DNA yield (79.3 ng per gram of meconium). Samples extracted with kit PS had the highest detectable levels of 16S rRNA gene by qPCR. The ability of each kit to overcome PCR inhibition varied, with qPCR on GBS-spiked DNA from kits QS, QM, PS, and PM recovering 87.1, 91.0, 88.8, and 37.9% GBS DNA, respectively. Double IRT improved the performance of kit PM, increasing GBS recovery to 56.5%. However, once DNA yield was normalized to the level recovered with the other kits 100% of GBS DNA was detected, suggesting that levels of PCR inhibitors are related to DNA yield from kit PM. Ion Torrent 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a high level of inter-kit variation in meconium microbiome structure. In particular, kit QM showed a bias toward extracting Firmicute DNA, while the other kits extracted primarily Proteobacterial DNA. Choice of extraction kit greatly impacts on the ability to extract and detect bacterial DNA in meconium and on the microbiome community structure generated from these samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5826226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58262262018-03-07 Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies Stinson, Lisa F. Keelan, Jeffrey A. Payne, Matthew S. Front Microbiol Microbiology The establishment of human gut microbiota commences initially in utero. Meconium—the first fecal material passed after birth—can be used to study fetal gut contents; however, processing meconium samples for microbiome studies presents significant technical challenges. Meconium hosts a low biomass microbiome, is tar-like in texture and contains high concentrations of PCR inhibitors. This study aimed to evaluate four different DNA extraction methods to elucidate the most effective method for bacterial DNA recovery and sequencing analysis from first-pass meconium. Samples from five infants were collected and processed using the following extraction kits: (1) Qiagen QIAamp DNA Stool Mini (QS); (2) Qiagen QIAamp DNA Microbiome (QM); (3) MoBio PowerSoil (PS); (4) MoBio MagAttract PowerMicrobiome (PM). Additionally, Kit PM was employed with a double inhibitor removal treatment (IRT) step (PM2). Bacterial DNA recovery was assessed by qPCR. Any PCR inhibition in samples was measured by spiking DNA eluates with 0.1 ng of pure Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) DNA followed by qPCR quantitation. Kit PM yielded the highest average total DNA yield (79.3 ng per gram of meconium). Samples extracted with kit PS had the highest detectable levels of 16S rRNA gene by qPCR. The ability of each kit to overcome PCR inhibition varied, with qPCR on GBS-spiked DNA from kits QS, QM, PS, and PM recovering 87.1, 91.0, 88.8, and 37.9% GBS DNA, respectively. Double IRT improved the performance of kit PM, increasing GBS recovery to 56.5%. However, once DNA yield was normalized to the level recovered with the other kits 100% of GBS DNA was detected, suggesting that levels of PCR inhibitors are related to DNA yield from kit PM. Ion Torrent 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a high level of inter-kit variation in meconium microbiome structure. In particular, kit QM showed a bias toward extracting Firmicute DNA, while the other kits extracted primarily Proteobacterial DNA. Choice of extraction kit greatly impacts on the ability to extract and detect bacterial DNA in meconium and on the microbiome community structure generated from these samples. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5826226/ /pubmed/29515550 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00270 Text en Copyright © 2018 Stinson, Keelan and Payne. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Stinson, Lisa F.
Keelan, Jeffrey A.
Payne, Matthew S.
Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies
title Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies
title_full Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies
title_fullStr Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies
title_short Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies
title_sort comparison of meconium dna extraction methods for use in microbiome studies
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00270
work_keys_str_mv AT stinsonlisaf comparisonofmeconiumdnaextractionmethodsforuseinmicrobiomestudies
AT keelanjeffreya comparisonofmeconiumdnaextractionmethodsforuseinmicrobiomestudies
AT paynematthews comparisonofmeconiumdnaextractionmethodsforuseinmicrobiomestudies