Cargando…

The Expression and Prognostic Impact of Immune Cytolytic Activity-Related Markers in Human Malignancies: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Recently, immune-checkpoint blockade has shown striking clinical results in different cancer patients. However, a significant inter-individual and inter-tumor variability exists among different cancers. The expression of the toxins granzyme A (GZMA) and perforin 1 (PRF1), secreted by eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roufas, Constantinos, Chasiotis, Dimitrios, Makris, Anestis, Efstathiades, Christodoulos, Dimopoulos, Christos, Zaravinos, Apostolos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515971
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00027
_version_ 1783302343063764992
author Roufas, Constantinos
Chasiotis, Dimitrios
Makris, Anestis
Efstathiades, Christodoulos
Dimopoulos, Christos
Zaravinos, Apostolos
author_facet Roufas, Constantinos
Chasiotis, Dimitrios
Makris, Anestis
Efstathiades, Christodoulos
Dimopoulos, Christos
Zaravinos, Apostolos
author_sort Roufas, Constantinos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, immune-checkpoint blockade has shown striking clinical results in different cancer patients. However, a significant inter-individual and inter-tumor variability exists among different cancers. The expression of the toxins granzyme A (GZMA) and perforin 1 (PRF1), secreted by effector cytotoxic T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, were recently used as a denominator of the intratumoral immune cytolytic activity (CYT). These levels are significantly elevated upon CD8+ T-cell activation as well as during a productive clinical response against immune-checkpoint blockade therapies. Still, it is not completely understood how different tumors induce and adapt to immune responses. METHODS: Here, we calculated the CYT across different cancer types and focused on differences between primary and metastatic tumors. Using data from 10,355, primary tumor resection samples and 2,787 normal samples that we extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Genotype-Tissue Expression project databases, we screened the variation of CYT across 32 different cancer types and 28 different normal tissue types. We correlated the cytolytic levels in each cancer type with the corresponding patient group’s overall survival, the expression of several immune-checkpoint molecules, as well as with the load of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) in these tumors. RESULTS: We found diverse levels of CYT across different cancer types, with highest levels in kidney, lung, and cervical cancers, and lowest levels in glioma, adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), and uveal melanoma. GZMA protein was either lowly expressed or absent in at least half of these tumors; whereas PRF1 protein was not detected in almost any of the different tumor types, analyzing tissue microarrays from 20 different tumor types. CYT was significantly higher in metastatic skin melanoma and correlated significantly to the TIL load. In TCGA-ACC, skin melanoma, and bladder cancer, CYT was associated with an improved patient outcome and high levels of both GZMA and PRF1 synergistically affected patient survival in these cancers. In bladder, breast, colon, esophageal, kidney, ovarian, pancreatic, testicular, and thyroid cancers, high CYT was accompanied by upregulation of at least one immune-checkpoint molecule, indicating that similar to melanoma and prostate cancer, immune responses in cytolytic-high tumors elicit immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. CONCLUSION: Overall, our data highlight the existence of diverse levels of CYT across different cancer types and suggest that along with the existence of complicated associations among various tumor-infiltrated immune cells, it is capable to promote or inhibit the establishment of a permissive tumor microenvironment, depending on the cancer type. High levels of immunosuppression seem to exist in several tumor types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5826382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58263822018-03-07 The Expression and Prognostic Impact of Immune Cytolytic Activity-Related Markers in Human Malignancies: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis Roufas, Constantinos Chasiotis, Dimitrios Makris, Anestis Efstathiades, Christodoulos Dimopoulos, Christos Zaravinos, Apostolos Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Recently, immune-checkpoint blockade has shown striking clinical results in different cancer patients. However, a significant inter-individual and inter-tumor variability exists among different cancers. The expression of the toxins granzyme A (GZMA) and perforin 1 (PRF1), secreted by effector cytotoxic T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, were recently used as a denominator of the intratumoral immune cytolytic activity (CYT). These levels are significantly elevated upon CD8+ T-cell activation as well as during a productive clinical response against immune-checkpoint blockade therapies. Still, it is not completely understood how different tumors induce and adapt to immune responses. METHODS: Here, we calculated the CYT across different cancer types and focused on differences between primary and metastatic tumors. Using data from 10,355, primary tumor resection samples and 2,787 normal samples that we extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Genotype-Tissue Expression project databases, we screened the variation of CYT across 32 different cancer types and 28 different normal tissue types. We correlated the cytolytic levels in each cancer type with the corresponding patient group’s overall survival, the expression of several immune-checkpoint molecules, as well as with the load of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) in these tumors. RESULTS: We found diverse levels of CYT across different cancer types, with highest levels in kidney, lung, and cervical cancers, and lowest levels in glioma, adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), and uveal melanoma. GZMA protein was either lowly expressed or absent in at least half of these tumors; whereas PRF1 protein was not detected in almost any of the different tumor types, analyzing tissue microarrays from 20 different tumor types. CYT was significantly higher in metastatic skin melanoma and correlated significantly to the TIL load. In TCGA-ACC, skin melanoma, and bladder cancer, CYT was associated with an improved patient outcome and high levels of both GZMA and PRF1 synergistically affected patient survival in these cancers. In bladder, breast, colon, esophageal, kidney, ovarian, pancreatic, testicular, and thyroid cancers, high CYT was accompanied by upregulation of at least one immune-checkpoint molecule, indicating that similar to melanoma and prostate cancer, immune responses in cytolytic-high tumors elicit immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. CONCLUSION: Overall, our data highlight the existence of diverse levels of CYT across different cancer types and suggest that along with the existence of complicated associations among various tumor-infiltrated immune cells, it is capable to promote or inhibit the establishment of a permissive tumor microenvironment, depending on the cancer type. High levels of immunosuppression seem to exist in several tumor types. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5826382/ /pubmed/29515971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00027 Text en Copyright © 2018 Roufas, Chasiotis, Makris, Efstathiades, Dimopoulos and Zaravinos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Roufas, Constantinos
Chasiotis, Dimitrios
Makris, Anestis
Efstathiades, Christodoulos
Dimopoulos, Christos
Zaravinos, Apostolos
The Expression and Prognostic Impact of Immune Cytolytic Activity-Related Markers in Human Malignancies: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis
title The Expression and Prognostic Impact of Immune Cytolytic Activity-Related Markers in Human Malignancies: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis
title_full The Expression and Prognostic Impact of Immune Cytolytic Activity-Related Markers in Human Malignancies: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis
title_fullStr The Expression and Prognostic Impact of Immune Cytolytic Activity-Related Markers in Human Malignancies: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Expression and Prognostic Impact of Immune Cytolytic Activity-Related Markers in Human Malignancies: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis
title_short The Expression and Prognostic Impact of Immune Cytolytic Activity-Related Markers in Human Malignancies: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis
title_sort expression and prognostic impact of immune cytolytic activity-related markers in human malignancies: a comprehensive meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515971
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00027
work_keys_str_mv AT roufasconstantinos theexpressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT chasiotisdimitrios theexpressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT makrisanestis theexpressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT efstathiadeschristodoulos theexpressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT dimopouloschristos theexpressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT zaravinosapostolos theexpressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT roufasconstantinos expressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT chasiotisdimitrios expressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT makrisanestis expressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT efstathiadeschristodoulos expressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT dimopouloschristos expressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT zaravinosapostolos expressionandprognosticimpactofimmunecytolyticactivityrelatedmarkersinhumanmalignanciesacomprehensivemetaanalysis