Cargando…
CD obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion
OBJECTIVE: We used CD obese prone (OP) and obese resistant (OR) rats to examine how weight gain and fat accretion relate to fermentation levels and microbiota composition after feeding resistant starch (RS). METHODS: After feeding OP rats and OR rats a high fat (HF) diet for 4 weeks, rats were strat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.22120 |
_version_ | 1783302379995660288 |
---|---|
author | Obanda, Diana Page, Ryan Guice, Justin Raggio, Anne M Husseneder, Claudia Marx, Brian Stout, Rhett W Welsh, David A Taylor, Christopher M Luo, Meng Blanchard, Eugene E Bendiks, Zach Coulon, Diana Keenan, Michael J |
author_facet | Obanda, Diana Page, Ryan Guice, Justin Raggio, Anne M Husseneder, Claudia Marx, Brian Stout, Rhett W Welsh, David A Taylor, Christopher M Luo, Meng Blanchard, Eugene E Bendiks, Zach Coulon, Diana Keenan, Michael J |
author_sort | Obanda, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We used CD obese prone (OP) and obese resistant (OR) rats to examine how weight gain and fat accretion relate to fermentation levels and microbiota composition after feeding resistant starch (RS). METHODS: After feeding OP rats and OR rats a high fat (HF) diet for 4 weeks, rats were stratified into three groups: fed either a HF diet (HF), switched to a low fat (LF) diet or a LF diet supplemented with RS (LF-RS, 20% wt) for 4 weeks. Energy intake, body weight, fermentation variables and microbiota composition were determined. RESULTS: In OP rats, RS elicited robust fermentation (increased cecal contents, short chain fatty acids and serum GLP-1). Total bacteria, species of the Bacteroidales family S24-7 and the archaea Methanobrevibacter smithii increased. The robust fermentation did not elicit higher weight or fat accretion compared to control rats fed the same isocaloric diets (HFLF±RS). In OR rats, body weight and fat accretion were also not different between HFLF±RS diets, but RS elicited minimal changes in fermentation and microbiota composition. CONCLUSIONS: Robust fermentation did not contribute to greater weight. Fermentation levels and changes in microbiota composition in response to dietary RS differ by obese phenotype. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5826621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58266212019-03-01 CD obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion Obanda, Diana Page, Ryan Guice, Justin Raggio, Anne M Husseneder, Claudia Marx, Brian Stout, Rhett W Welsh, David A Taylor, Christopher M Luo, Meng Blanchard, Eugene E Bendiks, Zach Coulon, Diana Keenan, Michael J Obesity (Silver Spring) Article OBJECTIVE: We used CD obese prone (OP) and obese resistant (OR) rats to examine how weight gain and fat accretion relate to fermentation levels and microbiota composition after feeding resistant starch (RS). METHODS: After feeding OP rats and OR rats a high fat (HF) diet for 4 weeks, rats were stratified into three groups: fed either a HF diet (HF), switched to a low fat (LF) diet or a LF diet supplemented with RS (LF-RS, 20% wt) for 4 weeks. Energy intake, body weight, fermentation variables and microbiota composition were determined. RESULTS: In OP rats, RS elicited robust fermentation (increased cecal contents, short chain fatty acids and serum GLP-1). Total bacteria, species of the Bacteroidales family S24-7 and the archaea Methanobrevibacter smithii increased. The robust fermentation did not elicit higher weight or fat accretion compared to control rats fed the same isocaloric diets (HFLF±RS). In OR rats, body weight and fat accretion were also not different between HFLF±RS diets, but RS elicited minimal changes in fermentation and microbiota composition. CONCLUSIONS: Robust fermentation did not contribute to greater weight. Fermentation levels and changes in microbiota composition in response to dietary RS differ by obese phenotype. 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5826621/ /pubmed/29464911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.22120 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Obanda, Diana Page, Ryan Guice, Justin Raggio, Anne M Husseneder, Claudia Marx, Brian Stout, Rhett W Welsh, David A Taylor, Christopher M Luo, Meng Blanchard, Eugene E Bendiks, Zach Coulon, Diana Keenan, Michael J CD obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion |
title | CD obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion |
title_full | CD obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion |
title_fullStr | CD obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion |
title_full_unstemmed | CD obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion |
title_short | CD obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion |
title_sort | cd obese-prone rats, but not obese-resistant, robustly ferment resistant starch without increased weight or fat accretion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.22120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obandadiana cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT pageryan cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT guicejustin cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT raggioannem cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT hussenederclaudia cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT marxbrian cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT stoutrhettw cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT welshdavida cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT taylorchristopherm cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT luomeng cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT blanchardeugenee cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT bendikszach cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT coulondiana cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion AT keenanmichaelj cdobeseproneratsbutnotobeseresistantrobustlyfermentresistantstarchwithoutincreasedweightorfataccretion |