Cargando…

How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews

Background: Entering the Clinical Elective Year (CEY) is a challenging transition phase for undergraduate medical students. Students become members of a professional team, thereby taking over certain tasks, which are executed more or less independently. Factors which facilitate (or impede) this tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beck, Samuel, Schirlo, Christian, Breckwoldt, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5827187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001161
_version_ 1783302442422632448
author Beck, Samuel
Schirlo, Christian
Breckwoldt, Jan
author_facet Beck, Samuel
Schirlo, Christian
Breckwoldt, Jan
author_sort Beck, Samuel
collection PubMed
description Background: Entering the Clinical Elective Year (CEY) is a challenging transition phase for undergraduate medical students. Students become members of a professional team, thereby taking over certain tasks, which are executed more or less independently. Factors which facilitate (or impede) this transition in the perception of students are not well described. We therefore wanted to explore, what students perceived to be helpful during the first phase of the CEY and possibly derive respective recommendations. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 5th year medical students after they had completed the first two months of their CEY. Students were asked which problems they had faced and how they felt prepared for the CEY. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed by qualitative content analysis. Results: From 34 interviews, we included 28 into analysis. Overall, 24 students were satisfied or very satisfied with their start into the CEY. Satisfaction was expressed with respect to workplace experiences, learning progress, responsibilities and team integration. Especially, students appreciated if they were integrated as active members of the team, were given responsibility for certain units of work, and received well-structured formal teaching and supervision. Students had divergent opinions about the quality of teaching and supervision, about their own achievements, and the recognition they received. Students recommended improvements in respect to formal teaching and supervision by clinical supervisors, preparation of the CEY by university, and supporting structures in the hosting institution. Conclusion: Students in this study were generally satisfied with the first two months of their CEY. Facilitating factors were active and responsible involvement into routine patient care, and high quality formal teaching and supervision. Findings may inform universities, teaching hospitals, and students how to better shape the first phase of the CEY.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5827187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58271872018-03-01 How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews Beck, Samuel Schirlo, Christian Breckwoldt, Jan GMS J Med Educ Article Background: Entering the Clinical Elective Year (CEY) is a challenging transition phase for undergraduate medical students. Students become members of a professional team, thereby taking over certain tasks, which are executed more or less independently. Factors which facilitate (or impede) this transition in the perception of students are not well described. We therefore wanted to explore, what students perceived to be helpful during the first phase of the CEY and possibly derive respective recommendations. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 5th year medical students after they had completed the first two months of their CEY. Students were asked which problems they had faced and how they felt prepared for the CEY. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed by qualitative content analysis. Results: From 34 interviews, we included 28 into analysis. Overall, 24 students were satisfied or very satisfied with their start into the CEY. Satisfaction was expressed with respect to workplace experiences, learning progress, responsibilities and team integration. Especially, students appreciated if they were integrated as active members of the team, were given responsibility for certain units of work, and received well-structured formal teaching and supervision. Students had divergent opinions about the quality of teaching and supervision, about their own achievements, and the recognition they received. Students recommended improvements in respect to formal teaching and supervision by clinical supervisors, preparation of the CEY by university, and supporting structures in the hosting institution. Conclusion: Students in this study were generally satisfied with the first two months of their CEY. Facilitating factors were active and responsible involvement into routine patient care, and high quality formal teaching and supervision. Findings may inform universities, teaching hospitals, and students how to better shape the first phase of the CEY. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5827187/ /pubmed/29497699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001161 Text en Copyright © 2018 Beck et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Beck, Samuel
Schirlo, Christian
Breckwoldt, Jan
How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews
title How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews
title_full How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews
title_fullStr How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews
title_full_unstemmed How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews
title_short How the Start into the Clinical Elective Year Could be Improved: Qualitative Results and Recommendations from Student Interviews
title_sort how the start into the clinical elective year could be improved: qualitative results and recommendations from student interviews
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5827187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001161
work_keys_str_mv AT becksamuel howthestartintotheclinicalelectiveyearcouldbeimprovedqualitativeresultsandrecommendationsfromstudentinterviews
AT schirlochristian howthestartintotheclinicalelectiveyearcouldbeimprovedqualitativeresultsandrecommendationsfromstudentinterviews
AT breckwoldtjan howthestartintotheclinicalelectiveyearcouldbeimprovedqualitativeresultsandrecommendationsfromstudentinterviews