Cargando…
Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy procedures are commonly performed and have high success rates. However, poor or inadequate bowel preparation is one of the most common reasons for a repeated or failed colonoscopy. We therefore performed an observational study followed by propensity score modeling to evaluate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5827897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29511401 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr942w |
_version_ | 1783302546332319744 |
---|---|
author | Kaiser Junior, Roberto L. de Quadros, Luiz G. Faria, Mikaell A.G. Kaiser, Fernanda S.L. Campo, Juan C.O. Zotarelli Filho, Idiberto J. |
author_facet | Kaiser Junior, Roberto L. de Quadros, Luiz G. Faria, Mikaell A.G. Kaiser, Fernanda S.L. Campo, Juan C.O. Zotarelli Filho, Idiberto J. |
author_sort | Kaiser Junior, Roberto L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy procedures are commonly performed and have high success rates. However, poor or inadequate bowel preparation is one of the most common reasons for a repeated or failed colonoscopy. We therefore performed an observational study followed by propensity score modeling to evaluate and compare the quality of bowel preparation with the use of Aquanet bowel cleansing devices (BCDs) versus the use of oral sodium picosulfate solution. METHODS: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study to compare the quality of pre-endoscopic bowel preparation using a BCD with oral solution. Our major outcome of interest was the quality of bowel preparation as measured through the Boston bowel preparation (BBP) scale. Our main predictor was the method of bowel preparation. The bowel was prepared using either sodium picosulfate or the BCD. RESULTS: A total of 314 participants were part of this study. The average age of the participants was 54 years and most of the participants were females (81%). Sodium picosulfate was associated with better scores at each segment. After propensity scoring with a 1:1 match and further adjusting for the unbalanced variable (age), we found that despite the apparent superior cleansing performance of sodium picosulfate over the BCD, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study reinforces previous reports regarding the quality, safety and comfort of BCDs, indicating that this technique should be considered for colonoscopy preparation. In the future, randomized controlled trials should be performed to validate these preliminary findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5827897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58278972018-03-06 Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation Kaiser Junior, Roberto L. de Quadros, Luiz G. Faria, Mikaell A.G. Kaiser, Fernanda S.L. Campo, Juan C.O. Zotarelli Filho, Idiberto J. Gastroenterology Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy procedures are commonly performed and have high success rates. However, poor or inadequate bowel preparation is one of the most common reasons for a repeated or failed colonoscopy. We therefore performed an observational study followed by propensity score modeling to evaluate and compare the quality of bowel preparation with the use of Aquanet bowel cleansing devices (BCDs) versus the use of oral sodium picosulfate solution. METHODS: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study to compare the quality of pre-endoscopic bowel preparation using a BCD with oral solution. Our major outcome of interest was the quality of bowel preparation as measured through the Boston bowel preparation (BBP) scale. Our main predictor was the method of bowel preparation. The bowel was prepared using either sodium picosulfate or the BCD. RESULTS: A total of 314 participants were part of this study. The average age of the participants was 54 years and most of the participants were females (81%). Sodium picosulfate was associated with better scores at each segment. After propensity scoring with a 1:1 match and further adjusting for the unbalanced variable (age), we found that despite the apparent superior cleansing performance of sodium picosulfate over the BCD, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study reinforces previous reports regarding the quality, safety and comfort of BCDs, indicating that this technique should be considered for colonoscopy preparation. In the future, randomized controlled trials should be performed to validate these preliminary findings. Elmer Press 2018-02 2018-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5827897/ /pubmed/29511401 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr942w Text en Copyright 2018, Kaiser Junior et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kaiser Junior, Roberto L. de Quadros, Luiz G. Faria, Mikaell A.G. Kaiser, Fernanda S.L. Campo, Juan C.O. Zotarelli Filho, Idiberto J. Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation |
title | Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation |
title_full | Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation |
title_short | Aquanet Bowel Cleansing Device Versus Oral Sodium Picosulfate for Pre-Endoscopy Bowel Preparation: Propensity Score Analysis for Interventional Effectiveness Evaluation |
title_sort | aquanet bowel cleansing device versus oral sodium picosulfate for pre-endoscopy bowel preparation: propensity score analysis for interventional effectiveness evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5827897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29511401 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr942w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaiserjuniorrobertol aquanetbowelcleansingdeviceversusoralsodiumpicosulfateforpreendoscopybowelpreparationpropensityscoreanalysisforinterventionaleffectivenessevaluation AT dequadrosluizg aquanetbowelcleansingdeviceversusoralsodiumpicosulfateforpreendoscopybowelpreparationpropensityscoreanalysisforinterventionaleffectivenessevaluation AT fariamikaellag aquanetbowelcleansingdeviceversusoralsodiumpicosulfateforpreendoscopybowelpreparationpropensityscoreanalysisforinterventionaleffectivenessevaluation AT kaiserfernandasl aquanetbowelcleansingdeviceversusoralsodiumpicosulfateforpreendoscopybowelpreparationpropensityscoreanalysisforinterventionaleffectivenessevaluation AT campojuanco aquanetbowelcleansingdeviceversusoralsodiumpicosulfateforpreendoscopybowelpreparationpropensityscoreanalysisforinterventionaleffectivenessevaluation AT zotarellifilhoidibertoj aquanetbowelcleansingdeviceversusoralsodiumpicosulfateforpreendoscopybowelpreparationpropensityscoreanalysisforinterventionaleffectivenessevaluation |