Cargando…

Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material

BACKGROUND: Daodi medicinal material is widely used in Chinese herb medication. However, there is a lack of systematic methodology for identifying characteristics associated with good quality and reliable efficacy of Daodi med-material. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to provide some evidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Xingyue, Tian, Xin, Zhou, Yannan, Liu, Yali, Li, Xinlong, Lu, Tingting, Yu, Changhe, He, Liyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6763130
_version_ 1783302617846251520
author Yang, Xingyue
Tian, Xin
Zhou, Yannan
Liu, Yali
Li, Xinlong
Lu, Tingting
Yu, Changhe
He, Liyun
author_facet Yang, Xingyue
Tian, Xin
Zhou, Yannan
Liu, Yali
Li, Xinlong
Lu, Tingting
Yu, Changhe
He, Liyun
author_sort Yang, Xingyue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Daodi medicinal material is widely used in Chinese herb medication. However, there is a lack of systematic methodology for identifying characteristics associated with good quality and reliable efficacy of Daodi med-material. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to provide some evidence to further substantiate the use of Daodi medicinal materials. METHODS: Seven relevant databases were searched before July 2014. Two evaluators were responsible for screening and categorizing the results. The data was analyzed with Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS 21.0 statistical software. RESULTS: Overall, 107 articles were systematically analyzed. Of these studies, 55.1% (59/107) focused on the methodology to assess Daodi med-material, and 38.3% (41/107) were interested in med-material ingredients, soil physical and chemical properties, and the geological background system (GBS). Only 6.5% (7/107) of studies were mainly conducted as clinical trials and animal experiments. CONCLUSION: Comparisons between Daodi and non-Daodi materials have been studied mainly in terms of the ingredients or composition of medical materials, soil physics and chemistry, and the GBS, and some identifying methodologies have been created to identify Daodi attributes. Until now, there is still no consensus of comparison criteria between Daodi and non-Daodi medicinal material. Only a few studies were conducted through animal experiments and clinical trials to determine Daodi superiority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5828320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58283202018-03-29 Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material Yang, Xingyue Tian, Xin Zhou, Yannan Liu, Yali Li, Xinlong Lu, Tingting Yu, Changhe He, Liyun Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article BACKGROUND: Daodi medicinal material is widely used in Chinese herb medication. However, there is a lack of systematic methodology for identifying characteristics associated with good quality and reliable efficacy of Daodi med-material. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to provide some evidence to further substantiate the use of Daodi medicinal materials. METHODS: Seven relevant databases were searched before July 2014. Two evaluators were responsible for screening and categorizing the results. The data was analyzed with Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS 21.0 statistical software. RESULTS: Overall, 107 articles were systematically analyzed. Of these studies, 55.1% (59/107) focused on the methodology to assess Daodi med-material, and 38.3% (41/107) were interested in med-material ingredients, soil physical and chemical properties, and the geological background system (GBS). Only 6.5% (7/107) of studies were mainly conducted as clinical trials and animal experiments. CONCLUSION: Comparisons between Daodi and non-Daodi materials have been studied mainly in terms of the ingredients or composition of medical materials, soil physics and chemistry, and the GBS, and some identifying methodologies have been created to identify Daodi attributes. Until now, there is still no consensus of comparison criteria between Daodi and non-Daodi medicinal material. Only a few studies were conducted through animal experiments and clinical trials to determine Daodi superiority. Hindawi 2018-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5828320/ /pubmed/29599808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6763130 Text en Copyright © 2018 Xingyue Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yang, Xingyue
Tian, Xin
Zhou, Yannan
Liu, Yali
Li, Xinlong
Lu, Tingting
Yu, Changhe
He, Liyun
Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material
title Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material
title_full Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material
title_fullStr Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material
title_short Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material
title_sort evidence-based study to compare daodi traditional chinese medicinal material and non-daodi traditional chinese medicinal material
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29599808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6763130
work_keys_str_mv AT yangxingyue evidencebasedstudytocomparedaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterialandnondaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterial
AT tianxin evidencebasedstudytocomparedaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterialandnondaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterial
AT zhouyannan evidencebasedstudytocomparedaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterialandnondaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterial
AT liuyali evidencebasedstudytocomparedaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterialandnondaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterial
AT lixinlong evidencebasedstudytocomparedaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterialandnondaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterial
AT lutingting evidencebasedstudytocomparedaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterialandnondaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterial
AT yuchanghe evidencebasedstudytocomparedaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterialandnondaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterial
AT heliyun evidencebasedstudytocomparedaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterialandnondaoditraditionalchinesemedicinalmaterial