Cargando…
Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model
Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193543 |
_version_ | 1783302627241492480 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Shankun Kang, Ran Deng, Tuo Luo, Lianmin Wang, Jiamin Li, Ermao Luo, Jintai Liu, Luhao Wan, ShawPong Zhao, Zhigang |
author_facet | Zhao, Shankun Kang, Ran Deng, Tuo Luo, Lianmin Wang, Jiamin Li, Ermao Luo, Jintai Liu, Luhao Wan, ShawPong Zhao, Zhigang |
author_sort | Zhao, Shankun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this study was to compare the measuring outcomes using two different cannulation sites. To validate the capacity of our study, both normal and the castration-induced erectile dysfunction rat models were conducted. Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized equally into two groups: an intact group and a castration group. Five rats from each group firstly underwent different stimulation parameters to detect the optimal erectile responses. The residual rats in each group were further assigned into two subgroups (n = 10 per subgroup) according to two different cannulation sites (crus or shaft of the corpus cavernosum). The ICP values were compared between groups after different interventions. The optimal parameters for mean maximum ICP were recorded at 2.5V and a frequency of 15 Hz. The rats under the two different cannulation sites tended to show similar ICP values in both the intact and the castration groups. However, the success rate in monitoring ICP was significantly higher in the groups cannulating into the shaft of the penis compared to the crus (100% vs. 70%; P = 0.02). Our data suggested that the method of cannulation into the penile shaft could serve as a better alternative for the ICP measurement in rats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5828359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58283592018-03-19 Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model Zhao, Shankun Kang, Ran Deng, Tuo Luo, Lianmin Wang, Jiamin Li, Ermao Luo, Jintai Liu, Luhao Wan, ShawPong Zhao, Zhigang PLoS One Research Article Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this study was to compare the measuring outcomes using two different cannulation sites. To validate the capacity of our study, both normal and the castration-induced erectile dysfunction rat models were conducted. Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized equally into two groups: an intact group and a castration group. Five rats from each group firstly underwent different stimulation parameters to detect the optimal erectile responses. The residual rats in each group were further assigned into two subgroups (n = 10 per subgroup) according to two different cannulation sites (crus or shaft of the corpus cavernosum). The ICP values were compared between groups after different interventions. The optimal parameters for mean maximum ICP were recorded at 2.5V and a frequency of 15 Hz. The rats under the two different cannulation sites tended to show similar ICP values in both the intact and the castration groups. However, the success rate in monitoring ICP was significantly higher in the groups cannulating into the shaft of the penis compared to the crus (100% vs. 70%; P = 0.02). Our data suggested that the method of cannulation into the penile shaft could serve as a better alternative for the ICP measurement in rats. Public Library of Science 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5828359/ /pubmed/29486011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193543 Text en © 2018 Zhao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhao, Shankun Kang, Ran Deng, Tuo Luo, Lianmin Wang, Jiamin Li, Ermao Luo, Jintai Liu, Luhao Wan, ShawPong Zhao, Zhigang Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model |
title | Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model |
title_full | Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model |
title_short | Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model |
title_sort | comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoshankun comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT kangran comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT dengtuo comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT luolianmin comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT wangjiamin comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT liermao comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT luojintai comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT liuluhao comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT wanshawpong comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel AT zhaozhigang comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel |