Cargando…

Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model

Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Shankun, Kang, Ran, Deng, Tuo, Luo, Lianmin, Wang, Jiamin, Li, Ermao, Luo, Jintai, Liu, Luhao, Wan, ShawPong, Zhao, Zhigang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193543
_version_ 1783302627241492480
author Zhao, Shankun
Kang, Ran
Deng, Tuo
Luo, Lianmin
Wang, Jiamin
Li, Ermao
Luo, Jintai
Liu, Luhao
Wan, ShawPong
Zhao, Zhigang
author_facet Zhao, Shankun
Kang, Ran
Deng, Tuo
Luo, Lianmin
Wang, Jiamin
Li, Ermao
Luo, Jintai
Liu, Luhao
Wan, ShawPong
Zhao, Zhigang
author_sort Zhao, Shankun
collection PubMed
description Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this study was to compare the measuring outcomes using two different cannulation sites. To validate the capacity of our study, both normal and the castration-induced erectile dysfunction rat models were conducted. Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized equally into two groups: an intact group and a castration group. Five rats from each group firstly underwent different stimulation parameters to detect the optimal erectile responses. The residual rats in each group were further assigned into two subgroups (n = 10 per subgroup) according to two different cannulation sites (crus or shaft of the corpus cavernosum). The ICP values were compared between groups after different interventions. The optimal parameters for mean maximum ICP were recorded at 2.5V and a frequency of 15 Hz. The rats under the two different cannulation sites tended to show similar ICP values in both the intact and the castration groups. However, the success rate in monitoring ICP was significantly higher in the groups cannulating into the shaft of the penis compared to the crus (100% vs. 70%; P = 0.02). Our data suggested that the method of cannulation into the penile shaft could serve as a better alternative for the ICP measurement in rats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5828359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58283592018-03-19 Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model Zhao, Shankun Kang, Ran Deng, Tuo Luo, Lianmin Wang, Jiamin Li, Ermao Luo, Jintai Liu, Luhao Wan, ShawPong Zhao, Zhigang PLoS One Research Article Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this study was to compare the measuring outcomes using two different cannulation sites. To validate the capacity of our study, both normal and the castration-induced erectile dysfunction rat models were conducted. Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized equally into two groups: an intact group and a castration group. Five rats from each group firstly underwent different stimulation parameters to detect the optimal erectile responses. The residual rats in each group were further assigned into two subgroups (n = 10 per subgroup) according to two different cannulation sites (crus or shaft of the corpus cavernosum). The ICP values were compared between groups after different interventions. The optimal parameters for mean maximum ICP were recorded at 2.5V and a frequency of 15 Hz. The rats under the two different cannulation sites tended to show similar ICP values in both the intact and the castration groups. However, the success rate in monitoring ICP was significantly higher in the groups cannulating into the shaft of the penis compared to the crus (100% vs. 70%; P = 0.02). Our data suggested that the method of cannulation into the penile shaft could serve as a better alternative for the ICP measurement in rats. Public Library of Science 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5828359/ /pubmed/29486011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193543 Text en © 2018 Zhao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Shankun
Kang, Ran
Deng, Tuo
Luo, Lianmin
Wang, Jiamin
Li, Ermao
Luo, Jintai
Liu, Luhao
Wan, ShawPong
Zhao, Zhigang
Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model
title Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model
title_full Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model
title_fullStr Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model
title_short Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model
title_sort comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193543
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoshankun comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT kangran comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT dengtuo comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT luolianmin comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT wangjiamin comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT liermao comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT luojintai comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT liuluhao comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT wanshawpong comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT zhaozhigang comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel