Cargando…
Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain
To standardize outcome reporting in clinical trials of patients with nonspecific low back pain, an international multidisciplinary panel recommended physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as core outcome domains. Given the lack of a consensus on measurement...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29194127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117 |
_version_ | 1783302631864664064 |
---|---|
author | Chiarotto, Alessandro Boers, Maarten Deyo, Richard A. Buchbinder, Rachelle Corbin, Terry P. Costa, Leonardo O.P. Foster, Nadine E. Grotle, Margreth Koes, Bart W. Kovacs, Francisco M. Lin, C.-W. Christine Maher, Chris G. Pearson, Adam M. Peul, Wilco C. Schoene, Mark L. Turk, Dennis C. van Tulder, Maurits W. Terwee, Caroline B. Ostelo, Raymond W. |
author_facet | Chiarotto, Alessandro Boers, Maarten Deyo, Richard A. Buchbinder, Rachelle Corbin, Terry P. Costa, Leonardo O.P. Foster, Nadine E. Grotle, Margreth Koes, Bart W. Kovacs, Francisco M. Lin, C.-W. Christine Maher, Chris G. Pearson, Adam M. Peul, Wilco C. Schoene, Mark L. Turk, Dennis C. van Tulder, Maurits W. Terwee, Caroline B. Ostelo, Raymond W. |
author_sort | Chiarotto, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | To standardize outcome reporting in clinical trials of patients with nonspecific low back pain, an international multidisciplinary panel recommended physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as core outcome domains. Given the lack of a consensus on measurement instruments for these 3 domains in patients with low back pain, this study aimed to generate such consensus. The measurement properties of 17 patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning, 3 for pain intensity, and 5 for HRQoL were appraised in 3 systematic reviews following the COSMIN methodology. Researchers, clinicians, and patients (n = 207) were invited in a 2-round Delphi survey to generate consensus (≥67% agreement among participants) on which instruments to endorse. Response rates were 44% and 41%, respectively. In round 1, consensus was achieved on the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a for physical functioning (78% agreement) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (75% agreement). No consensus was achieved on any HRQoL instrument, although the Short Form 12 (SF12) approached the consensus threshold (64% agreement). In round 2, a consensus was reached on an NRS version with a 1-week recall period (96% agreement). Various participants requested 1 free-to-use instrument per domain. Considering all issues together, recommendations on core instruments were formulated: Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a or 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for physical functioning, NRS for pain intensity, and SF12 or 10-item PROMIS Global Health form for HRQoL. Further studies need to fill the evidence gaps on the measurement properties of these and other instruments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5828378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58283782018-03-06 Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain Chiarotto, Alessandro Boers, Maarten Deyo, Richard A. Buchbinder, Rachelle Corbin, Terry P. Costa, Leonardo O.P. Foster, Nadine E. Grotle, Margreth Koes, Bart W. Kovacs, Francisco M. Lin, C.-W. Christine Maher, Chris G. Pearson, Adam M. Peul, Wilco C. Schoene, Mark L. Turk, Dennis C. van Tulder, Maurits W. Terwee, Caroline B. Ostelo, Raymond W. Pain Research Paper To standardize outcome reporting in clinical trials of patients with nonspecific low back pain, an international multidisciplinary panel recommended physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as core outcome domains. Given the lack of a consensus on measurement instruments for these 3 domains in patients with low back pain, this study aimed to generate such consensus. The measurement properties of 17 patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning, 3 for pain intensity, and 5 for HRQoL were appraised in 3 systematic reviews following the COSMIN methodology. Researchers, clinicians, and patients (n = 207) were invited in a 2-round Delphi survey to generate consensus (≥67% agreement among participants) on which instruments to endorse. Response rates were 44% and 41%, respectively. In round 1, consensus was achieved on the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a for physical functioning (78% agreement) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (75% agreement). No consensus was achieved on any HRQoL instrument, although the Short Form 12 (SF12) approached the consensus threshold (64% agreement). In round 2, a consensus was reached on an NRS version with a 1-week recall period (96% agreement). Various participants requested 1 free-to-use instrument per domain. Considering all issues together, recommendations on core instruments were formulated: Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a or 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for physical functioning, NRS for pain intensity, and SF12 or 10-item PROMIS Global Health form for HRQoL. Further studies need to fill the evidence gaps on the measurement properties of these and other instruments. Wolters Kluwer 2018-03 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5828378/ /pubmed/29194127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Chiarotto, Alessandro Boers, Maarten Deyo, Richard A. Buchbinder, Rachelle Corbin, Terry P. Costa, Leonardo O.P. Foster, Nadine E. Grotle, Margreth Koes, Bart W. Kovacs, Francisco M. Lin, C.-W. Christine Maher, Chris G. Pearson, Adam M. Peul, Wilco C. Schoene, Mark L. Turk, Dennis C. van Tulder, Maurits W. Terwee, Caroline B. Ostelo, Raymond W. Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain |
title | Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain |
title_full | Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain |
title_fullStr | Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain |
title_short | Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain |
title_sort | core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29194127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiarottoalessandro coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT boersmaarten coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT deyoricharda coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT buchbinderrachelle coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT corbinterryp coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT costaleonardoop coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT fosternadinee coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT grotlemargreth coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT koesbartw coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT kovacsfranciscom coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT lincwchristine coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT maherchrisg coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT pearsonadamm coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT peulwilcoc coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT schoenemarkl coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT turkdennisc coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT vantuldermauritsw coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT terweecarolineb coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain AT osteloraymondw coreoutcomemeasurementinstrumentsforclinicaltrialsinnonspecificlowbackpain |