Cargando…

Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use

BACKGROUND: The AGREE II instrument is the most commonly used guideline appraisal tool. It includes 23 appraisal criteria (items) organized within six domains. AGREE II also includes two overall assessments (overall guideline quality, recommendation for use). Our aim was to investigate how strongly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann-Eßer, Wiebke, Siering, Ulrich, Neugebauer, Edmund A. M., Brockhaus, Anne Catharina, McGauran, Natalie, Eikermann, Michaela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29482555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2954-8
_version_ 1783302637446234112
author Hoffmann-Eßer, Wiebke
Siering, Ulrich
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Brockhaus, Anne Catharina
McGauran, Natalie
Eikermann, Michaela
author_facet Hoffmann-Eßer, Wiebke
Siering, Ulrich
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Brockhaus, Anne Catharina
McGauran, Natalie
Eikermann, Michaela
author_sort Hoffmann-Eßer, Wiebke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The AGREE II instrument is the most commonly used guideline appraisal tool. It includes 23 appraisal criteria (items) organized within six domains. AGREE II also includes two overall assessments (overall guideline quality, recommendation for use). Our aim was to investigate how strongly the 23 AGREE II items influence the two overall assessments. METHODS: An online survey of authors of publications on guideline appraisals with AGREE II and guideline users from a German scientific network was conducted between 10th February 2015 and 30th March 2015. Participants were asked to rate the influence of the AGREE II items on a Likert scale (0 = no influence to 5 = very strong influence). The frequencies of responses and their dispersion were presented descriptively. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of the 376 persons contacted (15.4%) participated in the survey and the data of the 51 respondents with prior knowledge of AGREE II were analysed. Items 7–12 of Domain 3 (rigour of development) and both items of Domain 6 (editorial independence) had the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. In addition, Items 15–17 (clarity of presentation) had a strong influence on the recommendation for use. Great variations were shown for the other items. The main limitation of the survey is the low response rate. CONCLUSIONS: In guideline appraisals using AGREE II, items representing rigour of guideline development and editorial independence seem to have the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. In order to ensure a transparent approach to reaching the overall assessments, we suggest the inclusion of a recommendation in the AGREE II user manual on how to consider item and domain scores. For instance, the manual could include an a-priori weighting of those items and domains that should have the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. The relevance of these assessments within AGREE II could thereby be further specified. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-2954-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5828401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58284012018-02-28 Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use Hoffmann-Eßer, Wiebke Siering, Ulrich Neugebauer, Edmund A. M. Brockhaus, Anne Catharina McGauran, Natalie Eikermann, Michaela BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The AGREE II instrument is the most commonly used guideline appraisal tool. It includes 23 appraisal criteria (items) organized within six domains. AGREE II also includes two overall assessments (overall guideline quality, recommendation for use). Our aim was to investigate how strongly the 23 AGREE II items influence the two overall assessments. METHODS: An online survey of authors of publications on guideline appraisals with AGREE II and guideline users from a German scientific network was conducted between 10th February 2015 and 30th March 2015. Participants were asked to rate the influence of the AGREE II items on a Likert scale (0 = no influence to 5 = very strong influence). The frequencies of responses and their dispersion were presented descriptively. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of the 376 persons contacted (15.4%) participated in the survey and the data of the 51 respondents with prior knowledge of AGREE II were analysed. Items 7–12 of Domain 3 (rigour of development) and both items of Domain 6 (editorial independence) had the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. In addition, Items 15–17 (clarity of presentation) had a strong influence on the recommendation for use. Great variations were shown for the other items. The main limitation of the survey is the low response rate. CONCLUSIONS: In guideline appraisals using AGREE II, items representing rigour of guideline development and editorial independence seem to have the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. In order to ensure a transparent approach to reaching the overall assessments, we suggest the inclusion of a recommendation in the AGREE II user manual on how to consider item and domain scores. For instance, the manual could include an a-priori weighting of those items and domains that should have the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. The relevance of these assessments within AGREE II could thereby be further specified. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-2954-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5828401/ /pubmed/29482555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2954-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoffmann-Eßer, Wiebke
Siering, Ulrich
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Brockhaus, Anne Catharina
McGauran, Natalie
Eikermann, Michaela
Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use
title Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use
title_full Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use
title_fullStr Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use
title_full_unstemmed Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use
title_short Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use
title_sort guideline appraisal with agree ii: online survey of the potential influence of agree ii items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29482555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2954-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmanneßerwiebke guidelineappraisalwithagreeiionlinesurveyofthepotentialinfluenceofagreeiiitemsonoverallassessmentofguidelinequalityandrecommendationforuse
AT sieringulrich guidelineappraisalwithagreeiionlinesurveyofthepotentialinfluenceofagreeiiitemsonoverallassessmentofguidelinequalityandrecommendationforuse
AT neugebaueredmundam guidelineappraisalwithagreeiionlinesurveyofthepotentialinfluenceofagreeiiitemsonoverallassessmentofguidelinequalityandrecommendationforuse
AT brockhausannecatharina guidelineappraisalwithagreeiionlinesurveyofthepotentialinfluenceofagreeiiitemsonoverallassessmentofguidelinequalityandrecommendationforuse
AT mcgaurannatalie guidelineappraisalwithagreeiionlinesurveyofthepotentialinfluenceofagreeiiitemsonoverallassessmentofguidelinequalityandrecommendationforuse
AT eikermannmichaela guidelineappraisalwithagreeiionlinesurveyofthepotentialinfluenceofagreeiiitemsonoverallassessmentofguidelinequalityandrecommendationforuse