Cargando…

Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO(2) Separations

[Image: see text] Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been considered as highly promising materials for adsorption-based CO(2) separations. The number of synthesized MOFs has been increasing very rapidly. High-throughput molecular simulations are very useful to screen large numbers of MOFs in order...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dokur, Derya, Keskin, Seda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29503503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04792
_version_ 1783302686148395008
author Dokur, Derya
Keskin, Seda
author_facet Dokur, Derya
Keskin, Seda
author_sort Dokur, Derya
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been considered as highly promising materials for adsorption-based CO(2) separations. The number of synthesized MOFs has been increasing very rapidly. High-throughput molecular simulations are very useful to screen large numbers of MOFs in order to identify the most promising adsorbents prior to extensive experimental studies. Results of molecular simulations depend on the force field used to define the interactions between gas molecules and MOFs. Choosing the appropriate force field for MOFs is essential to make reliable predictions about the materials’ performance. In this work, we performed two sets of molecular simulations using the two widely used generic force fields, Dreiding and UFF, and obtained adsorption data of CO(2)/H(2), CO(2)/N(2), and CO(2)/CH(4) mixtures in 100 different MOF structures. Using this adsorption data, several adsorbent evaluation metrics including selectivity, working capacity, sorbent selection parameter, and percent regenerability were computed for each MOF. MOFs were then ranked based on these evaluation metrics, and top performing materials were identified. We then examined the sensitivity of the MOF rankings to the force field type. Our results showed that although there are significant quantitative differences between some adsorbent evaluation metrics computed using different force fields, rankings of the top MOF adsorbents for CO(2) separations are generally similar: 8, 8, and 9 out of the top 10 most selective MOFs were found to be identical in the ranking for CO(2)/H(2), CO(2)/N(2), and CO(2)/CH(4) separations using Dreiding and UFF. We finally suggested a force field factor depending on the energy parameters of atoms present in the MOFs to quantify the robustness of the simulation results to the force field selection. This easily computable factor will be highly useful to determine whether the results are sensitive to the force field type or not prior to performing computationally demanding molecular simulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5828708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58287082018-02-28 Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO(2) Separations Dokur, Derya Keskin, Seda Ind Eng Chem Res [Image: see text] Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been considered as highly promising materials for adsorption-based CO(2) separations. The number of synthesized MOFs has been increasing very rapidly. High-throughput molecular simulations are very useful to screen large numbers of MOFs in order to identify the most promising adsorbents prior to extensive experimental studies. Results of molecular simulations depend on the force field used to define the interactions between gas molecules and MOFs. Choosing the appropriate force field for MOFs is essential to make reliable predictions about the materials’ performance. In this work, we performed two sets of molecular simulations using the two widely used generic force fields, Dreiding and UFF, and obtained adsorption data of CO(2)/H(2), CO(2)/N(2), and CO(2)/CH(4) mixtures in 100 different MOF structures. Using this adsorption data, several adsorbent evaluation metrics including selectivity, working capacity, sorbent selection parameter, and percent regenerability were computed for each MOF. MOFs were then ranked based on these evaluation metrics, and top performing materials were identified. We then examined the sensitivity of the MOF rankings to the force field type. Our results showed that although there are significant quantitative differences between some adsorbent evaluation metrics computed using different force fields, rankings of the top MOF adsorbents for CO(2) separations are generally similar: 8, 8, and 9 out of the top 10 most selective MOFs were found to be identical in the ranking for CO(2)/H(2), CO(2)/N(2), and CO(2)/CH(4) separations using Dreiding and UFF. We finally suggested a force field factor depending on the energy parameters of atoms present in the MOFs to quantify the robustness of the simulation results to the force field selection. This easily computable factor will be highly useful to determine whether the results are sensitive to the force field type or not prior to performing computationally demanding molecular simulations. American Chemical Society 2018-01-18 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5828708/ /pubmed/29503503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04792 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Dokur, Derya
Keskin, Seda
Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO(2) Separations
title Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO(2) Separations
title_full Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO(2) Separations
title_fullStr Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO(2) Separations
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO(2) Separations
title_short Effects of Force Field Selection on the Computational Ranking of MOFs for CO(2) Separations
title_sort effects of force field selection on the computational ranking of mofs for co(2) separations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29503503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04792
work_keys_str_mv AT dokurderya effectsofforcefieldselectiononthecomputationalrankingofmofsforco2separations
AT keskinseda effectsofforcefieldselectiononthecomputationalrankingofmofsforco2separations