Cargando…
How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex
How did full meiotic eukaryotic sex evolve and what was the immediate advantage allowing it to develop? We propose that the crucial determinant can be found in internal reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation at the start of eukaryotic evolution approximately 2 × 10(9) years ago. The large amount of...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2706 |
_version_ | 1783302756168105984 |
---|---|
author | Hörandl, Elvira Speijer, Dave |
author_facet | Hörandl, Elvira Speijer, Dave |
author_sort | Hörandl, Elvira |
collection | PubMed |
description | How did full meiotic eukaryotic sex evolve and what was the immediate advantage allowing it to develop? We propose that the crucial determinant can be found in internal reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation at the start of eukaryotic evolution approximately 2 × 10(9) years ago. The large amount of ROS coming from a bacterial endosymbiont gave rise to DNA damage and vast increases in host genome mutation rates. Eukaryogenesis and chromosome evolution represent adaptations to oxidative stress. The host, an archaeon, most probably already had repair mechanisms based on DNA pairing and recombination, and possibly some kind of primitive cell fusion mechanism. The detrimental effects of internal ROS formation on host genome integrity set the stage allowing evolution of meiotic sex from these humble beginnings. Basic meiotic mechanisms thus probably evolved in response to endogenous ROS production by the ‘pre-mitochondrion’. This alternative to mitosis is crucial under novel, ROS-producing stress situations, like extensive motility or phagotrophy in heterotrophs and endosymbiontic photosynthesis in autotrophs. In multicellular eukaryotes with a germline–soma differentiation, meiotic sex with diploid–haploid cycles improved efficient purging of deleterious mutations. Constant pressure of endogenous ROS explains the ubiquitous maintenance of meiotic sex in practically all eukaryotic kingdoms. Here, we discuss the relevant observations underpinning this model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5829205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58292052018-03-02 How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex Hörandl, Elvira Speijer, Dave Proc Biol Sci Review Articles How did full meiotic eukaryotic sex evolve and what was the immediate advantage allowing it to develop? We propose that the crucial determinant can be found in internal reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation at the start of eukaryotic evolution approximately 2 × 10(9) years ago. The large amount of ROS coming from a bacterial endosymbiont gave rise to DNA damage and vast increases in host genome mutation rates. Eukaryogenesis and chromosome evolution represent adaptations to oxidative stress. The host, an archaeon, most probably already had repair mechanisms based on DNA pairing and recombination, and possibly some kind of primitive cell fusion mechanism. The detrimental effects of internal ROS formation on host genome integrity set the stage allowing evolution of meiotic sex from these humble beginnings. Basic meiotic mechanisms thus probably evolved in response to endogenous ROS production by the ‘pre-mitochondrion’. This alternative to mitosis is crucial under novel, ROS-producing stress situations, like extensive motility or phagotrophy in heterotrophs and endosymbiontic photosynthesis in autotrophs. In multicellular eukaryotes with a germline–soma differentiation, meiotic sex with diploid–haploid cycles improved efficient purging of deleterious mutations. Constant pressure of endogenous ROS explains the ubiquitous maintenance of meiotic sex in practically all eukaryotic kingdoms. Here, we discuss the relevant observations underpinning this model. The Royal Society 2018-02-14 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5829205/ /pubmed/29436502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2706 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Hörandl, Elvira Speijer, Dave How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex |
title | How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex |
title_full | How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex |
title_fullStr | How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex |
title_full_unstemmed | How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex |
title_short | How oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex |
title_sort | how oxygen gave rise to eukaryotic sex |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horandlelvira howoxygengaverisetoeukaryoticsex AT speijerdave howoxygengaverisetoeukaryoticsex |