Cargando…
Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: The optimisation of health science communication (HSC) between researchers and the public is crucial. In the last decade, the rise of the digital and social media ecosystem allowed for the disintermediation of HSC. Disintermediation refers to the public’s direct access to information f...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833 |
_version_ | 1783302837884682240 |
---|---|
author | Fontaine, Guillaume Lavallée, Andréane Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Bouix-Picasso, Julien Bourbonnais, Anne |
author_facet | Fontaine, Guillaume Lavallée, Andréane Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Bouix-Picasso, Julien Bourbonnais, Anne |
author_sort | Fontaine, Guillaume |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The optimisation of health science communication (HSC) between researchers and the public is crucial. In the last decade, the rise of the digital and social media ecosystem allowed for the disintermediation of HSC. Disintermediation refers to the public’s direct access to information from researchers about health science-related topics through the digital and social media ecosystem, a process that would otherwise require a human mediator, such as a journalist. Therefore, the primary aim of this scoping review is to describe the nature and the extent of the literature regarding HSC strategies involving disintermediation used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem. The secondary aim is to describe the HSC strategies used by researchers, and the communication channels associated with these strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology and perform a systematic search of six bibliographical databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, IBSS, PubMed, Sociological Abstracts and Web of Science), four trial registries and relevant sources of grey literature. Relevant journals and reference lists of included records will be hand-searched. Data will be managed using the EndNote software and the Rayyan web application. Two review team members will perform independently the screening process as well as the full-text assessment of included records. Descriptive data will be synthesised in a tabular format. Data regarding the nature and the extent of the literature, the HSC strategies and the associated communication channels will be presented narratively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require institutional review board approval as we will use only collected and published data. Results will allow the mapping of the literature about HSC between researchers and the public in the digital and social media ecosystem, and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5829594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58295942018-03-05 Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol Fontaine, Guillaume Lavallée, Andréane Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Bouix-Picasso, Julien Bourbonnais, Anne BMJ Open Communication INTRODUCTION: The optimisation of health science communication (HSC) between researchers and the public is crucial. In the last decade, the rise of the digital and social media ecosystem allowed for the disintermediation of HSC. Disintermediation refers to the public’s direct access to information from researchers about health science-related topics through the digital and social media ecosystem, a process that would otherwise require a human mediator, such as a journalist. Therefore, the primary aim of this scoping review is to describe the nature and the extent of the literature regarding HSC strategies involving disintermediation used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem. The secondary aim is to describe the HSC strategies used by researchers, and the communication channels associated with these strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology and perform a systematic search of six bibliographical databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, IBSS, PubMed, Sociological Abstracts and Web of Science), four trial registries and relevant sources of grey literature. Relevant journals and reference lists of included records will be hand-searched. Data will be managed using the EndNote software and the Rayyan web application. Two review team members will perform independently the screening process as well as the full-text assessment of included records. Descriptive data will be synthesised in a tabular format. Data regarding the nature and the extent of the literature, the HSC strategies and the associated communication channels will be presented narratively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require institutional review board approval as we will use only collected and published data. Results will allow the mapping of the literature about HSC between researchers and the public in the digital and social media ecosystem, and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5829594/ /pubmed/29382682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Communication Fontaine, Guillaume Lavallée, Andréane Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Bouix-Picasso, Julien Bourbonnais, Anne Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title | Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_full | Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_short | Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_sort | health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29382682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fontaineguillaume healthsciencecommunicationstrategiesusedbyresearcherswiththepublicinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT lavalleeandreane healthsciencecommunicationstrategiesusedbyresearcherswiththepublicinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT maheucadottemarcandre healthsciencecommunicationstrategiesusedbyresearcherswiththepublicinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT bouixpicassojulien healthsciencecommunicationstrategiesusedbyresearcherswiththepublicinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT bourbonnaisanne healthsciencecommunicationstrategiesusedbyresearcherswiththepublicinthedigitalandsocialmediaecosystemasystematicscopingreviewprotocol |