Cargando…
Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry)
INTRODUCTION: Traditional and transcatheter surgical treatments of severe aortic valve stenosis (SAVS) are increasing in parallel with the improved life expectancy. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported comparable or non-inferior mortality with transcatheter treatments compared with tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018036 |
_version_ | 1783302855895023616 |
---|---|
author | Onorati, Francesco Gherli, Riccardo Mariscalco, Giovanni Girdauskas, Evaldas Quintana, Eduardo Santini, Francesco De Feo, Marisa Sponga, Sandro Tozzi, Piergiorgio Bashir, Mohamad Perrotti, Andrea Pappalardo, Aniello Ruggieri, Vito Giovanni Santarpino, Giuseppe Rinaldi, Mauro Ronaldo, Silva Nicolini, Francesco |
author_facet | Onorati, Francesco Gherli, Riccardo Mariscalco, Giovanni Girdauskas, Evaldas Quintana, Eduardo Santini, Francesco De Feo, Marisa Sponga, Sandro Tozzi, Piergiorgio Bashir, Mohamad Perrotti, Andrea Pappalardo, Aniello Ruggieri, Vito Giovanni Santarpino, Giuseppe Rinaldi, Mauro Ronaldo, Silva Nicolini, Francesco |
author_sort | Onorati, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Traditional and transcatheter surgical treatments of severe aortic valve stenosis (SAVS) are increasing in parallel with the improved life expectancy. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported comparable or non-inferior mortality with transcatheter treatments compared with traditional surgery. However, RCTs have the limitation of being a mirror of the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, without reflecting the ‘real clinical world’. Technological improvements have recently allowed the development of minimally invasive surgical accesses and the use of sutureless valves, but their impact on the clinical scenario is difficult to assess because of the monocentric design of published studies and limited sample size. A prospective multicentre registry including all patients referred for a surgical treatment of SAVS (traditional, through full sternotomy; minimally invasive; or transcatheter; with both ‘sutured’ and ‘sutureless’ valves) will provide a ‘real-world’ picture of available results of current surgical options and will help to clarify the ‘grey zones’ of current guidelines. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: European Aortic Valve Registry is a prospective observational open registry designed to collect all data from patients admitted for SAVS, with or without coronary artery disease, in 16 cardiac surgery centres located in six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and UK). Patients will be enrolled over a 2-year period and followed up for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 10 years after enrolment. Outcome definitions are concordant with Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria and established guidelines. Primary outcome is 5-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes aim at establishing ‘early’ 30-day all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major morbidity, and ‘late’ cardiovascular mortality, major morbidity, structural and non-structural valve complications, quality of life and echocardiographic results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol is approved by local ethics committees. Any formal presentation or publication of data will be considered as a joint publication by the participating physician(s) and will follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for authorship. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03143361; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5829669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58296692018-03-01 Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry) Onorati, Francesco Gherli, Riccardo Mariscalco, Giovanni Girdauskas, Evaldas Quintana, Eduardo Santini, Francesco De Feo, Marisa Sponga, Sandro Tozzi, Piergiorgio Bashir, Mohamad Perrotti, Andrea Pappalardo, Aniello Ruggieri, Vito Giovanni Santarpino, Giuseppe Rinaldi, Mauro Ronaldo, Silva Nicolini, Francesco BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Traditional and transcatheter surgical treatments of severe aortic valve stenosis (SAVS) are increasing in parallel with the improved life expectancy. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported comparable or non-inferior mortality with transcatheter treatments compared with traditional surgery. However, RCTs have the limitation of being a mirror of the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, without reflecting the ‘real clinical world’. Technological improvements have recently allowed the development of minimally invasive surgical accesses and the use of sutureless valves, but their impact on the clinical scenario is difficult to assess because of the monocentric design of published studies and limited sample size. A prospective multicentre registry including all patients referred for a surgical treatment of SAVS (traditional, through full sternotomy; minimally invasive; or transcatheter; with both ‘sutured’ and ‘sutureless’ valves) will provide a ‘real-world’ picture of available results of current surgical options and will help to clarify the ‘grey zones’ of current guidelines. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: European Aortic Valve Registry is a prospective observational open registry designed to collect all data from patients admitted for SAVS, with or without coronary artery disease, in 16 cardiac surgery centres located in six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and UK). Patients will be enrolled over a 2-year period and followed up for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 10 years after enrolment. Outcome definitions are concordant with Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria and established guidelines. Primary outcome is 5-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes aim at establishing ‘early’ 30-day all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major morbidity, and ‘late’ cardiovascular mortality, major morbidity, structural and non-structural valve complications, quality of life and echocardiographic results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol is approved by local ethics committees. Any formal presentation or publication of data will be considered as a joint publication by the participating physician(s) and will follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for authorship. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03143361; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5829669/ /pubmed/29440154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018036 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Onorati, Francesco Gherli, Riccardo Mariscalco, Giovanni Girdauskas, Evaldas Quintana, Eduardo Santini, Francesco De Feo, Marisa Sponga, Sandro Tozzi, Piergiorgio Bashir, Mohamad Perrotti, Andrea Pappalardo, Aniello Ruggieri, Vito Giovanni Santarpino, Giuseppe Rinaldi, Mauro Ronaldo, Silva Nicolini, Francesco Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry) |
title | Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry) |
title_full | Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry) |
title_fullStr | Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry) |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry) |
title_short | Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry) |
title_sort | outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre european registry (e-avr registry) |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onoratifrancesco outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT gherliriccardo outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT mariscalcogiovanni outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT girdauskasevaldas outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT quintanaeduardo outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT santinifrancesco outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT defeomarisa outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT spongasandro outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT tozzipiergiorgio outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT bashirmohamad outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT perrottiandrea outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT pappalardoaniello outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT ruggierivitogiovanni outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT santarpinogiuseppe outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT rinaldimauro outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT ronaldosilva outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry AT nicolinifrancesco outcomescomparisonofdifferentsurgicalstrategiesforthemanagementofsevereaorticvalvestenosisstudyprotocolofaprospectivemulticentreeuropeanregistryeavrregistry |