Cargando…
Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility
OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity. DESIGN: A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409 |
_version_ | 1783302881393246208 |
---|---|
author | Dean, Sarah G Poltawski, Leon Forster, Anne Taylor, Rod S Spencer, Anne James, Martin Allison, Rhoda Stevens, Shirley Norris, Meriel Shepherd, Anthony I Landa, Paolo Pulsford, Richard M Hollands, Laura Calitri, Raff |
author_facet | Dean, Sarah G Poltawski, Leon Forster, Anne Taylor, Rod S Spencer, Anne James, Martin Allison, Rhoda Stevens, Shirley Norris, Meriel Shepherd, Anthony I Landa, Paolo Pulsford, Richard M Hollands, Laura Calitri, Raff |
author_sort | Dean, Sarah G |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity. DESIGN: A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluations. SETTING: Community settings across two sites in Devon. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were: 18 years old or over, with a diagnosis of stroke and with self-reported mobility issues, no contraindications to physical activity, discharged from National Health Service or any other formal rehabilitation programme at least 1 month before, willing to be randomised to either control or ReTrain and attend the training venue, possessing cognitive capacity and communication ability sufficient to participate. Participants were individually randomised (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for time since stroke and level of functional disability. Only outcome assessors independent of the research team were blinded to group allocation. INTERVENTIONS: ReTrain comprised (1) an introductory one-to-one session; (2) ten, twice-weekly group classes with up to two trainers and eight clients; (3) a closing one-to-one session, followed by three drop-in sessions over the subsequent 3 months. Participants received a bespoke home-based training programme. All participants received treatment as usual. The control group received an exercise after stroke advice booklet. OUTCOME MEASURES: Candidate primary outcomes included functional mobility and physical activity. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were randomised (ReTrain=23; Control=22); data were available from 40 participants at 6 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=19) and 41 at 9 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=20). We demonstrated ability to recruit and retain participants. Participants were not burdened by the requirements of the study. We were able to calculate sample estimates for candidate primary outcomes and test procedures for process and health economic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: All objectives were fulfilled and indicated that a definitive trial of ReTrain is feasible and acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02429180; Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5829775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58297752018-03-01 Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility Dean, Sarah G Poltawski, Leon Forster, Anne Taylor, Rod S Spencer, Anne James, Martin Allison, Rhoda Stevens, Shirley Norris, Meriel Shepherd, Anthony I Landa, Paolo Pulsford, Richard M Hollands, Laura Calitri, Raff BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity. DESIGN: A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluations. SETTING: Community settings across two sites in Devon. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were: 18 years old or over, with a diagnosis of stroke and with self-reported mobility issues, no contraindications to physical activity, discharged from National Health Service or any other formal rehabilitation programme at least 1 month before, willing to be randomised to either control or ReTrain and attend the training venue, possessing cognitive capacity and communication ability sufficient to participate. Participants were individually randomised (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for time since stroke and level of functional disability. Only outcome assessors independent of the research team were blinded to group allocation. INTERVENTIONS: ReTrain comprised (1) an introductory one-to-one session; (2) ten, twice-weekly group classes with up to two trainers and eight clients; (3) a closing one-to-one session, followed by three drop-in sessions over the subsequent 3 months. Participants received a bespoke home-based training programme. All participants received treatment as usual. The control group received an exercise after stroke advice booklet. OUTCOME MEASURES: Candidate primary outcomes included functional mobility and physical activity. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were randomised (ReTrain=23; Control=22); data were available from 40 participants at 6 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=19) and 41 at 9 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=20). We demonstrated ability to recruit and retain participants. Participants were not burdened by the requirements of the study. We were able to calculate sample estimates for candidate primary outcomes and test procedures for process and health economic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: All objectives were fulfilled and indicated that a definitive trial of ReTrain is feasible and acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02429180; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5829775/ /pubmed/29449290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Dean, Sarah G Poltawski, Leon Forster, Anne Taylor, Rod S Spencer, Anne James, Martin Allison, Rhoda Stevens, Shirley Norris, Meriel Shepherd, Anthony I Landa, Paolo Pulsford, Richard M Hollands, Laura Calitri, Raff Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility |
title | Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility |
title_full | Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility |
title_fullStr | Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility |
title_full_unstemmed | Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility |
title_short | Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility |
title_sort | community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (retrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deansarahg communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT poltawskileon communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT forsteranne communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT taylorrods communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT spenceranne communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT jamesmartin communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT allisonrhoda communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT stevensshirley communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT norrismeriel communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT shepherdanthonyi communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT landapaolo communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT pulsfordrichardm communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT hollandslaura communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility AT calitriraff communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility |