Cargando…

Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility

OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity. DESIGN: A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dean, Sarah G, Poltawski, Leon, Forster, Anne, Taylor, Rod S, Spencer, Anne, James, Martin, Allison, Rhoda, Stevens, Shirley, Norris, Meriel, Shepherd, Anthony I, Landa, Paolo, Pulsford, Richard M, Hollands, Laura, Calitri, Raff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409
_version_ 1783302881393246208
author Dean, Sarah G
Poltawski, Leon
Forster, Anne
Taylor, Rod S
Spencer, Anne
James, Martin
Allison, Rhoda
Stevens, Shirley
Norris, Meriel
Shepherd, Anthony I
Landa, Paolo
Pulsford, Richard M
Hollands, Laura
Calitri, Raff
author_facet Dean, Sarah G
Poltawski, Leon
Forster, Anne
Taylor, Rod S
Spencer, Anne
James, Martin
Allison, Rhoda
Stevens, Shirley
Norris, Meriel
Shepherd, Anthony I
Landa, Paolo
Pulsford, Richard M
Hollands, Laura
Calitri, Raff
author_sort Dean, Sarah G
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity. DESIGN: A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluations. SETTING: Community settings across two sites in Devon. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were: 18 years old or over, with a diagnosis of stroke and with self-reported mobility issues, no contraindications to physical activity, discharged from National Health Service or any other formal rehabilitation programme at least 1 month before, willing to be randomised to either control or ReTrain and attend the training venue, possessing cognitive capacity and communication ability sufficient to participate. Participants were individually randomised (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for time since stroke and level of functional disability. Only outcome assessors independent of the research team were blinded to group allocation. INTERVENTIONS: ReTrain comprised (1) an introductory one-to-one session; (2) ten, twice-weekly group classes with up to two trainers and eight clients; (3) a closing one-to-one session, followed by three drop-in sessions over the subsequent 3 months. Participants received a bespoke home-based training programme. All participants received treatment as usual. The control group received an exercise after stroke advice booklet. OUTCOME MEASURES: Candidate primary outcomes included functional mobility and physical activity. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were randomised (ReTrain=23; Control=22); data were available from 40 participants at 6 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=19) and 41 at 9 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=20). We demonstrated ability to recruit and retain participants. Participants were not burdened by the requirements of the study. We were able to calculate sample estimates for candidate primary outcomes and test procedures for process and health economic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: All objectives were fulfilled and indicated that a definitive trial of ReTrain is feasible and acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02429180; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5829775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58297752018-03-01 Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility Dean, Sarah G Poltawski, Leon Forster, Anne Taylor, Rod S Spencer, Anne James, Martin Allison, Rhoda Stevens, Shirley Norris, Meriel Shepherd, Anthony I Landa, Paolo Pulsford, Richard M Hollands, Laura Calitri, Raff BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity. DESIGN: A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluations. SETTING: Community settings across two sites in Devon. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were: 18 years old or over, with a diagnosis of stroke and with self-reported mobility issues, no contraindications to physical activity, discharged from National Health Service or any other formal rehabilitation programme at least 1 month before, willing to be randomised to either control or ReTrain and attend the training venue, possessing cognitive capacity and communication ability sufficient to participate. Participants were individually randomised (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for time since stroke and level of functional disability. Only outcome assessors independent of the research team were blinded to group allocation. INTERVENTIONS: ReTrain comprised (1) an introductory one-to-one session; (2) ten, twice-weekly group classes with up to two trainers and eight clients; (3) a closing one-to-one session, followed by three drop-in sessions over the subsequent 3 months. Participants received a bespoke home-based training programme. All participants received treatment as usual. The control group received an exercise after stroke advice booklet. OUTCOME MEASURES: Candidate primary outcomes included functional mobility and physical activity. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were randomised (ReTrain=23; Control=22); data were available from 40 participants at 6 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=19) and 41 at 9 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=20). We demonstrated ability to recruit and retain participants. Participants were not burdened by the requirements of the study. We were able to calculate sample estimates for candidate primary outcomes and test procedures for process and health economic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: All objectives were fulfilled and indicated that a definitive trial of ReTrain is feasible and acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02429180; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5829775/ /pubmed/29449290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Dean, Sarah G
Poltawski, Leon
Forster, Anne
Taylor, Rod S
Spencer, Anne
James, Martin
Allison, Rhoda
Stevens, Shirley
Norris, Meriel
Shepherd, Anthony I
Landa, Paolo
Pulsford, Richard M
Hollands, Laura
Calitri, Raff
Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility
title Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility
title_full Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility
title_fullStr Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility
title_full_unstemmed Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility
title_short Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility
title_sort community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (retrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409
work_keys_str_mv AT deansarahg communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT poltawskileon communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT forsteranne communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT taylorrods communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT spenceranne communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT jamesmartin communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT allisonrhoda communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT stevensshirley communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT norrismeriel communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT shepherdanthonyi communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT landapaolo communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT pulsfordrichardm communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT hollandslaura communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility
AT calitriraff communitybasedrehabilitationtrainingafterstrokeresultsofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrialretraininvestigatingacceptabilityandfeasibility